On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Minor correction: RICH Americans (and Canadians) don't appreciate this
dilemma. All the POOR people still using dial-up internet are the victims
It will be a bad day for all when poor people set the standards of
quality and functionality for the
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
Charles Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pity you can't read what is written. I never suggested lowering
standards, I actually suggested returning to a *higher* standard,
where people don't just use bloated tools to write bloated code, but
return to
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
Charles Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Minor correction: RICH Americans (and Canadians) don't appreciate this
dilemma. All the POOR people still using dial-up internet are the victims
It will be a bad
Brian Morrison wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
Charles Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, given that you have to get the signature database somehow, how do
you propose that it's done? I suppose that a version without this is
possible, but suppose I then build it on my Linux
