-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fixed. You can safely ignore the error about that version.
- -James
Thomas Cameron wrote:
All -
I'm not reporting a stability problem with an old version, I just
have a
question. I am running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4, update 3. The
All -
I'm not reporting a stability problem with an old version, I just have a
question. I am running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4, update 3. The
version of zlib (zlib-1.2.1.2-1.2) shows these entries in the changelog:
* Tue Jul 12 2005 Ivana Varekova [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.2.1.2-1.2
- fix for
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 17:34, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:57:16 +0100
Tarjei Knapstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody is whining here Dennis.
I was asking a question about what the zlib warning was all about. The
www.zlib.net:
October 3rd, 2004
Version 1.2.2
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 12:28 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Trog wrote:
No, it requires 1.2.2
To be specific, does it absolutely require 1.2.2, or does a
lower-but-not-buggy version work?
e.g. will 1.2.0.7 work ?
How on earth am I supposed to answer that? Sorry, my crystal ball has
On Wednesday 16 Feb 2005 08:44, Trog wrote:
No, it requires 1.2.2
To be specific, does it absolutely require 1.2.2, or does a
lower-but-not-buggy version work?
e.g. will 1.2.0.7 work ?
How on earth am I supposed to answer that? Sorry, my crystal ball has
failed on this occassion.
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 08:49, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Dörfler Andreas said:
the versioncheck for zlib isnt the best.
suse for example fixes the security hole
in 1.2.1 with patches and not with a installation
from a new version.
forget the warning.
Sounds like suse has introduced a
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 17:15, Trog wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 17:07 +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
I've got a mail server here running RH8 (yes, yes I know... :)), and
when trying to build clamav 0.83 RPMs it required zlib 1.2.1.2.
No, it requires 1.2.2
May I ask why? There doesn't
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 14:57 +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 08:49, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Dörfler Andreas said:
the versioncheck for zlib isnt the best.
suse for example fixes the security hole
in 1.2.1 with patches and not with a installation
from a new version.
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 15:11, Trog wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 14:57 +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 08:49, Dennis Peterson wrote:
snip
A simple search in the archive for zlib 1.2.2 turns this up:
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20041103.143255.97fa22ec.en.html
Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 15:11, Trog wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 14:57 +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 08:49, Dennis Peterson wrote:
snip
A simple search in the archive for zlib 1.2.2 turns this up:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:02:59 +0100
Tarjei Knapstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 17:15, Trog wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 17:07 +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
I've got a mail server here running RH8 (yes, yes I know... :)),
and when trying to build clamav 0.83 RPMs it
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:57:16 +0100
Tarjei Knapstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody is whining here Dennis.
I was asking a question about what the zlib warning was all about. The
www.zlib.net:
October 3rd, 2004
Version 1.2.2 eliminates a potential security vulnerability in zlib
1.2.1, so
I've got a mail server here running RH8 (yes, yes I know... :)), and
when trying to build clamav 0.83 RPMs it required zlib 1.2.1.2.
OK, downloaded the FC3 zlib SRPM, built and installed just fine.
However, during configure I get this:
WARNING: ** This ClamAV installation may be linked
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:15:04 + in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 17:07 +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
I've got a mail server here running RH8 (yes, yes I know... :)), and
when trying to build clamav 0.83 RPMs it required zlib 1.2.1.2.
No, it
Trog wrote:
No, it requires 1.2.2
To be specific, does it absolutely require 1.2.2, or does a
lower-but-not-buggy version work?
e.g. will 1.2.0.7 work ?
Regards,
Fajar
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Trog wrote:
No, it requires 1.2.2
To be specific, does it absolutely require 1.2.2, or does a
lower-but-not-buggy version work?
e.g. will 1.2.0.7 work ?
I got no problem with RH 9, zlib-1.1.4-8
___
To: Clamav-users
Subject: [Clamav-users] Broken zlib version?
I've got a mail server here running RH8 (yes, yes I know...
:)), and when trying to build clamav 0.83 RPMs it required
zlib 1.2.1.2.
OK, downloaded the FC3 zlib SRPM, built and installed just fine.
However, during configure I get
Dörfler Andreas said:
the versioncheck for zlib isnt the best.
suse for example fixes the security hole
in 1.2.1 with patches and not with a installation
from a new version.
forget the warning.
Sounds like suse has introduced a configuration management anomaly. How
much running around
18 matches
Mail list logo
