Hacı DAYI wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote On 03/28/2007 03:57 AM:
Gregory Carter wrote:
I would ban this user from this list as it is a Ad in disguise.
He just cross posted this same question to the iptables list.
Why would that be an Ad?
Are you 100% sure (or at least sure enough to
Does clamav have any certificate of any labs like www.icsalabs.com?
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Larry Yuma wrote:
Does clamav have any certificate of any labs like www.icsalabs.com?
No, nothing like that.
--
Best regards,
Christophmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit
On Tue, March 27, 2007 2:57 pm, Randal, Phil said:
Does clamav have any certificate of any labs like www.icsalabs.com?
And how does that make it a better product, exactly?
By letting you point to the certificate when your pointy-headed-boss
decides that every product must meet some standard.
Randal, Phil wrote:
Does clamav have any certificate of any labs like www.icsalabs.com?
And how does that make it a better product, exactly?
Who said anything about a better product?
Certification doesn't indicate a better product. It indicates either
that someone has shown that it has
I would ban this user from this list as it is a Ad in disguise.
He just cross posted this same question to the iptables list.
Kill the mail account.
-gc
Larry Yuma wrote:
Does clamav have any certificate of any labs like www.icsalabs.com?
___
Help
Gregory Carter wrote:
I would ban this user from this list as it is a Ad in disguise.
He just cross posted this same question to the iptables list.
Why would that be an Ad?
Are you 100% sure (or at least sure enough to decide to ban a user) that
he wasn't just someone who's trying to put an
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote On 03/28/2007 03:57 AM:
Gregory Carter wrote:
I would ban this user from this list as it is a Ad in disguise.
He just cross posted this same question to the iptables list.
Why would that be an Ad?
Are you 100% sure (or at least sure enough to decide to ban a
