] for more details.
Regards,
Micah
Micah Snyder
ClamAV Development
Talos
Cisco Systems, Inc.
-
From: clamav-users on behalf of
Jorge Bastos
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2023 2:11 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: [clamav-users] Upgrade to 1.0.0
Hi Guys!
I upgraded to 1.0.0
n only a small update is required, or no update is
> > required. See
> > https://docs.clamav.net/faq/faq-freshclam.html?highlight=wget#http-error-c
> > odes [2] for more details.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Micah
> >
> > Micah Snyder
> > ClamAV Development
> >
: [clamav-users] Upgrade to 1.0.0
Hi Guys!
I upgraded to 1.0.0, and boom, now I have a problem!!
Freshclam can't download/verify signatures databases.
I'm always getting this info below, the only thing that happened was
the upgrade!
For some reason I can't test the download with wget, maybe it's
of Jorge Bastos
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2023 2:11 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: [clamav-users] Upgrade to 1.0.0
Hi Guys!
I upgraded to 1.0.0, and boom, now I have a problem!!
Freshclam can't download/verify signatures databases.
I'm always getting this info below, the only thing
.
-
From: clamav-users on behalf of
Jorge Bastos
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2023 2:11 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: [clamav-users] Upgrade to 1.0.0
Hi Guys!
I upgraded to 1.0.0, and boom, now I have a problem!!
Freshclam can't download/verify signatures databases
?highlight=wget#http-error-codes
for more details.
Regards,
Micah
Micah Snyder
ClamAV Development
Talos
Cisco Systems, Inc.
From: clamav-users on behalf of Jorge
Bastos
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2023 2:11 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: [clamav-users] Upgrade
Hi Guys!
I upgraded to 1.0.0, and boom, now I have a problem!!
Freshclam can't download/verify signatures databases.
I'm always getting this info below, the only thing that happened was the
upgrade!
For some reason I can't test the download with wget, maybe it's
forbidden, if I try it on my
On 02.09.21 11:53, OLCESE, Marcelo Oscar.- wrote:
Good morning dear !!
who do you call dear? ;-)
I updated a Debian 10 to 11 and I get the CLAMAV error ... see the one in
bold and with bigger font.
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.103.2
Good morning dear !!
I updated a Debian 10 to 11 and I get the CLAMAV error ... see the one in
bold and with bigger font.
Do you know what it can be and how to solve it?, or does it just warn me of
the old version?
Thanks!
Marcelo.-
---
The following version(s) of the
Thanks Al.
I found that last night after my email.
It looks like I need to update the path with the new version that load when the
mac loads.
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Updating it can only properly be done by Apple and they have never been
interested in doing that since they first used it.
There are some very old instructions on how to update ClamAV on an OS X Server
>= 10.5.6. The author has made it clear that he won't be updating them and the
question I
I run a Mac OSX server – High Sierra.
I noticed in my anti virus log that there was a new version of Clam AV:
WARNING: Local version: 0.99.2 Recommended version: 0.101.1
I followed these instructions exactly and didn’t have any problems:
Upgrade of clamav to 0.100.0 disables Container CL_TYPE_ZIP regex signatures
for Office 2007+ files. Eg signatures attempting to match a contained file
of an Office zip.
Prior to 0.100.0 the Container for Office files was classified only as
CL_TYPE_ZIP.
With 0.100.0 the Container is classified
UPGRADE FILE has : http://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeInstructions which
redirects to https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq and going to FAQ -
Upgrading has a link Upgrade Instructions which goes here:
https://github.com/Upgrading.html which ends up in a 404.
I'm getting ready to upgrade on
On Oct 8, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Adam Jones amjo...@skidmore.edu wrote:
UPGRADE FILE has : http://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeInstructions which
redirects to https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq and going to FAQ -
Upgrading has a link Upgrade Instructions which goes here:
Hi,
How do I upgrade ClamAV version 0.95.3 package for Fedora 12 in ClamAV
0.97 tar.gz? There is a version 0.97 in yum package for this version of
Fedora?
Regards,
Clóvis
--
Clovis Tristao - UNICAMP/Faculdade de Engenharia Agricola
Administrador de Redes - Secao de Informatica (SINFO)
On 03/14/2011 01:15 PM, Clovis Tristao wrote:
Hi,
How do I upgrade ClamAV version 0.95.3 package for Fedora 12 in ClamAV
0.97 tar.gz? There is a version 0.97 in yum package for this version of
Fedora?
Regards,
Clóvis
Fedora 12 is no longer supported. If you want to stay with F12, you
I upgraded to 0.96.1. Whenever I restart clamd, it will prompt me the
error
below.
Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warning: Detected duplicate
databases /var/clamav/main.cvd and /var/clamav/main.cld, please manually
remove one of them
Which file should I delete?
In this
Hi,
I upgraded to 0.96.1. Whenever I restart clamd, it will prompt me the error
below.
Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warning: Detected duplicate
databases /var/clamav/main.cvd and /var/clamav/main.cld, please manually
remove one of them
Which file should I delete?
Regards
wL
On 5/21/10 9:28 PM, ClamAV List wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded to 0.96.1. Whenever I restart clamd, it will prompt me the error
below.
Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warning: Detected duplicate
databases /var/clamav/main.cvd and /var/clamav/main.cld, please manually
remove one of them
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:57 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
[...]
Yes, saw these on other packages from F11 and I hadn't time to figure
out how to circumvent that (which is the main reason for using F10
FWIW, it's here
I have been using Clamav for the last 4 years and have yet to experience the
problem I am seeing now.
I just upgraded to 0.95.2 and clamscan is still saying it is 0.93.3
As per upgrade instructions I first uninstalled 0.93.3, removed the old
directory, and then installed 0.95.2same for years
On 2009-07-15 15:43, Steve Meres wrote:
I have been using Clamav for the last 4 years and have yet to experience the
problem I am seeing now.
I just upgraded to 0.95.2 and clamscan is still saying it is 0.93.3
As per upgrade instructions I first uninstalled 0.93.3, removed the old
I hadn't run ldconfig at the time...oops, but I have finally fixed the
problema silly error and oversight on my part.
I was installing in the following manner as I usually do:
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc
make make check make install
I never realized that the process was
Just wonder, if use EPEL repository src rpm, why don't use the binary rpm
from repo directly?
BTW, some of servers of our clients also running FC3, which using the
source tar from clamav.net, seem work so far so good.
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 07:50 -0500, M. Lewis
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 01:33 -0700, martinnitram wrote:
[...]
Just wonder, if use EPEL repository src rpm, why don't use the binary rpm
from repo directly?
Never tried that recently.
If I have to guess: missing dependencies, need for newer packages, some
packages may have been renamed and
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on
this system.
Previously all upgrades were done via RPM, which of course has not
M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on
this system.
Previously all upgrades were done via RPM, which
aCaB wrote:
M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on
this system.
Previously all upgrades were done
On 2009-05-25 15:01, M. Lewis wrote:
aCaB wrote:
M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on
On 25.05.2009 / 07:01:05 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
aCaB wrote:
M. Lewis wrote:
Hi,
you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will
get any sort of compilation errors. Working them around is not trivial BTW.
If you can somehow get a gcc 3.x installed then
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:54 +0200, aCaB wrote:
[]
you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will
FC4 has gcc-4.0.2. So FC3 should have a gcc-3.
Just do `rpm -q gcc` or `yum install gcc` and see what it has/delivers.
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4.
this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:54 +0200, aCaB wrote:
[]
you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will
FC4 has gcc-4.0.2. So FC3 should have a gcc-3.
Just do `rpm -q gcc` or `yum install gcc` and see what it has/delivers.
Bernd
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4.
this, but I'm wondering if there
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4.
this, but I'm wondering if there
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 07:19 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
I'm doing the
On 05.01.09 11:24, tung dang wrote:
As i see, ClamAV runs on a engine, which is libclamav.so. I want to confirm
a small question.
Does ClamAV have any solution to upgrade new engine (For example, in the
case the new libclamav.so is released)?
It logs message(s) that the current engine is
On 2009-01-05 06:24, tung dang wrote:
Hi friends,
As i see, ClamAV runs on a engine, which is libclamav.so. I want to confirm
a small question.
Does ClamAV have any solution to upgrade new engine (For example, in the
case the new libclamav.so is released)?
Use whatever upgrade mechanism
Hi friends,
As i see, ClamAV runs on a engine, which is libclamav.so. I want to confirm
a small question.
Does ClamAV have any solution to upgrade new engine (For example, in the
case the new libclamav.so is released)?
Do I need re-install ClamAV?
Thank you so much
Best regards,
TungDH
I've upgraded many times in the past without this problem. In a nutshell,
I just did a configure, make and make install without uninstalling
previous versions like I always have. This time, while clamav starts and
runs with no errors, even in Verbose mode, it just doesn't work.
The SMTP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've upgraded many times in the past without this problem. In a nutshell,
I just did a configure, make and make install without uninstalling
previous versions like I always have. This time, while clamav starts and
runs with no errors, even in Verbose mode, it just
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've upgraded many times in the past without this problem. In a nutshell,
I just did a configure, make and make install without uninstalling
previous versions like I always have. This time, while clamav starts and
runs
So it appears my installed version is too old to update the database and
I need to upgrade from 0.90.3 to the latest version. I don't know who or
how this version of clamav was installed on this rhel4.6 es server but I
downloaded the tarball since clamav is not a supported rpm available
from
Carlos Williams wrote:
So it appears my installed version is too old to update the database and
I need to upgrade from 0.90.3 to the latest version. I don't know who or
how this version of clamav was installed on this rhel4.6 es server but I
downloaded the tarball since clamav is not a
Dennis Peterson wrote:
It looks like earlier versions were installed as RPM packages from
rpmforge using yum, not the RH repository. Have you tried using yum to
see if the current version is availble?
I had no idea YUM was even installed on this server. I thought YUM was
only available
Carlos Williams wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
It looks like earlier versions were installed as RPM packages from
rpmforge using yum, not the RH repository. Have you tried using yum to
see if the current version is availble?
I had no idea YUM was even installed on this server. I thought
Dennis Peterson wrote:
It looks like earlier versions were installed as RPM packages from
rpmforge using yum, not the RH repository. Have you tried using yum to
see if the current version is availble?
I am getting the following error when running yum update
-- Processing Dependency:
Carlos Williams wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
It looks like earlier versions were installed as RPM packages from
rpmforge using yum, not the RH repository. Have you tried using yum to
see if the current version is availble?
I am getting the following error when running yum update
--
Dennis Peterson wrote:
This was discussed on the list the last couple of day - check the
archives to see what is suggested. Google this:
libclamunrar_iface.so.3 site:clamav.net
I searched Google and could not find anything that was obvious to
resolving this dep. issue.
When I go to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carlos Williams wrote:
| I searched Google and could not find anything that was obvious to
| resolving this dep. issue.
|
| When I go to search the archives manually, I went to
| http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html and I get a blank page
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:21:17 -0400, Carlos Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
This was discussed on the list the last couple of day - check the
archives to see what is suggested. Google this:
libclamunrar_iface.so.3 site:clamav.net
I searched Google and could not
Dennis Peterson wrote:
This was discussed on the list the last couple of day - check the
archives to see what is suggested. Google this:
libclamunrar_iface.so.3 site:clamav.net
I searched Google and could not find anything that was obvious to
resolving this dep. issue.
Hello All
New User here. I'm having a problem when i try to upgrade my standard FC6
installed Clamav from 0.88.7 to 0.91.1. I'm following the instructions from
http://wiki.clamav.net/Main/RedHatInstall
[root@ Fedora6 RPMs]# rpm -Uvh clamav-0.90.3-1.i386.rpm
clamav-db-0.90.3-1.i386.rpm
Andrew Petrushanco wrote:
[root@ Fedora6 RPMs]# rpm -Uvh clamav-0.90.3-1.i386.rpm
clamav-db-0.90.3-1.i386.rpm clamav-devel-0.90.3-1.i386.rpm
clamav-server-0.90.3-1.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
Avoid using rpm on such operation. Use yum instead. It will (should ;-)
) resolve
On 15/08/07, Andrew Petrushanco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All
New User here. I'm having a problem when i try to upgrade my standard FC6
installed Clamav from 0.88.7 to 0.91.1. I'm following the instructions
from
http://wiki.clamav.net/Main/RedHatInstall
[root@ Fedora6 RPMs]# rpm
The verson what i donwload is 0.91.1.
Thanks...
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Miguel Bertos
Enviado el: martes, 17 de julio de 2007 11:32
Para: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Asunto: [Clamav-users] Upgrade Version
hi. My name is Miguel.
I
On 7/17/07, Miguel Bertos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi. My name is Miguel.
I have install the clamav version 0.90.3.
I download the version 0.90.1 and i go:
1º ./configure
2º make
3º make check
4º make install
5º /usr/bin/freshclambash:
When i go the step 5 i say:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am running clamav 0.88 and get the following message:
LibClamAV Warning:
LibClamAV Warning: *** This version of the ClamAV engine is outdated. ***
LibClamAV Warning: *** DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/faq.html ***
LibClamAV
You need to un-install the old version before installing the new. Make
clean is not an upgrade solution. It does only what it implies - it makes
the make files clean (deletes files so the next make run will be clean).
I believe you should have run make uninstall (someone correct me if I'm
wrong).
Thanks I'll give it a try.
Kevin W. Gagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/17/2007 11:39 AM
You need to un-install the old version before installing the new. Make
clean is not an upgrade solution. It does only what it implies - it makes
the make files clean (deletes files so the next make run will be
Aaron Schubert wrote:
Thanks I'll give it a try.
You should also be aware the configuration files have changed
significantly since 0.88 was released. And don't forget to stop the old
version before starting the new version.
dp
___
Help us build a
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:00:54 GMT
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In earnest, can't say as I'm very inspired to upgrade (from 0.88.7)
yet. Ranging from various serious pthread problems to excessive CPU
usage, to unlinking of pid files, to clamd dying, none of this makes
me feel inclined much to
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 09:55 -0700, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
- Original Message -
So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version?
I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating
problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades.
- Original Message -
So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version?
I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating
problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades.
What's the general concensous - You can't upgrade fast enough or
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kevin W. Gagel
Sent: maandag 12 maart 2007 18:00
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90? - Update
- Original Message -
So, its been a few days. How is everyone
- Original Message -
In earnest, can't say as I'm very inspired to upgrade (from 0.88.7) yet.
Ranging from various serious pthread problems to excessive CPU usage, to
unlinking of pid files, to clamd dying, none of this makes me feel
inclined much to do the upgrade; 0.90 may well be the
Mark wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kevin W. Gagel
Sent: maandag 12 maart 2007 18:00
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90? - Update
- Original Message -
So, its been a few days. How
On 13 Mar 2007, at 12:54 AM, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
Mark,
I feel for you. I use the source to install and un-install. I
assume this
is the reason I'm not having the problems some others have described.
I also use the source to install/re-install 0.90 and 0.90.1 on
OpenBSD. Tried it
Török Edvin wrote:
On 3/7/07, Abdul Rehman Gani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06 Mar 2007, at 4:55 PM, Scott Oertel wrote:
Just installed the 0.90_3 port, same problem, except it took a
little bit less time for the IO to get real high, for some reason
clam just can't keep up. I guess I'll
On 06 Mar 2007, at 4:55 PM, Scott Oertel wrote:
Just installed the 0.90_3 port, same problem, except it took a
little bit less time for the IO to get real high, for some reason
clam just can't keep up. I guess I'll wait until the next version
hits the ports tree and try again.
I just
Abdul Rehman Gani wrote:
On 06 Mar 2007, at 4:55 PM, Scott Oertel wrote:
Just installed the 0.90_3 port, same problem, except it took a little
bit less time for the IO to get real high, for some reason clam just
can't keep up. I guess I'll wait until the next version hits the
ports tree
On 3/7/07, Abdul Rehman Gani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06 Mar 2007, at 4:55 PM, Scott Oertel wrote:
Just installed the 0.90_3 port, same problem, except it took a
little bit less time for the IO to get real high, for some reason
clam just can't keep up. I guess I'll wait until the next
Kevin Way wrote:
Craig Green wrote:
Kevin Way wrote:
I had the same problems. FreeBSD/i386 6.2p1 and 6.2p0. Compiled
directly from the ports collection, without --experimental.
As far as we could tell, it just scanned slower and slower and then
stopped scanning.
That
Kevin wrote
Follow-up: The above work-around almost works, but clamd occasionally
dies without warning now. This is somewhat easier to live with than the
previous behavior, where it would be alive but would stop responding,
but it's still broken.
Doesn't the port currently in the FreeBSD
On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Jay West wrote:
Kevin wrote
Follow-up: The above work-around almost works, but clamd
occasionally
dies without warning now. This is somewhat easier to live with
than the
previous behavior, where it would be alive but would stop responding,
but it's still
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* On 20/02/07 16:25 -0500, Kevin Way wrote:
| Dennis Peterson wrote:
| So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new
version?
| I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback
indicating
| problems and very
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* On 20/02/07 16:25 -0500, Kevin Way wrote:
| Dennis Peterson wrote:
| So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version?
| I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating
| problems and very little about smooth and
i checked the 0.90.1 and the issue with the log .. for those like me who had
problems .. is corected
now it logs like before in clamd.log
thanks
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
helo
i made the upgrade today
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/kit/clamav-0.90# /usr/local/clamav/sbin/clamd --version
ClamAV 0.90/2614/Tue Feb 20 20:53:11 2007
i am using sendmail 8.14 compiled with milter support and also clamav compiled
with clamav-milter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/kit/clamav-0.90#
On Friday 16 February 2007 16:02, Robert Allerstorfer wrote:
Enabling the experimental code in 0.90 is dangerous because there has
been introduced a critical bug after the last release candidate has
been released, unfortunately without giving us a chance to test before
releasing it as final
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, 09:47 GMT+00 Nick Leverton wrote:
You are not authorized to access bug #295
I am logged into the bugzilla.
Is there any estimate of time to fix ? If this problem has been known
about for a week ? We rely heavily on Clam's phishing detection and I'm
very pleased with
Kevin Way wrote:
I had the same problems. FreeBSD/i386 6.2p1 and 6.2p0. Compiled
directly from the ports collection, without --experimental.
As far as we could tell, it just scanned slower and slower and then
stopped scanning.
That sounds like what happened here. See the ScanStream:
Craig Green wrote:
Kevin Way wrote:
I had the same problems. FreeBSD/i386 6.2p1 and 6.2p0. Compiled
directly from the ports collection, without --experimental.
As far as we could tell, it just scanned slower and slower and then
stopped scanning.
That sounds like what happened here.
It was written...
I had the same problems. FreeBSD/i386 6.2p1 and 6.2p0. Compiled
directly from the ports collection, without --experimental.
As far as we could tell, it just scanned slower and slower and then
stopped scanning.
That sounds like what happened here. See the ScanStream:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version?
I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating
problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades.
What's the general concensous - You can't upgrade fast enough or
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:13:38 -0800
Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:00 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800
Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just had to back it out of production. It
Hi, Bill,
Bill Landry wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 4:07 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:00:49 -0800
Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compile options: ./configure --enable-experimental
Please recompile without the experimental code and let us know if
Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote the following on 2/16/2007 1:59 AM -0800:
Hi, Bill,
Bill Landry wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 4:07 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:00:49 -0800
Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compile options: ./configure --enable-experimental
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, 07:36 GMT-08 Bill Landry wrote:
(Rolf E. Sonneveld):
Did you see any performance or crash issues after the
recompile-without-experimental?
/rolf
No issues to report yet - hope it stays that way...
Enabling the experimental code in 0.90 is dangerous because there has
So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version?
I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating
problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades.
What's the general concensous - You can't upgrade fast enough or Stay where
you are?
Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version?
I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating
problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades.
What's the general concensous - You can't upgrade fast enough or Stay
So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version?
I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating
problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades.
What's the general concensous - You can't upgrade fast enough or Stay where
you are?
There have been compatibility issues for the clamd.conf configuration
file. My configuration files used for 0.8 weren't compatibility with .9
and via-a-versa. I had several boolean options with no arguments, which
was accepted and implied as correct by previous .8 configuration file
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800
Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just had to back it out of production. It would not run more than a
couple minutes under a normal load that 88.7 shrugs off. It dies without
any error messages.
dp
Yep, I observed the same behavior on Fedora
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:13:38 -0800
Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:00 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800
Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just had to back it out of production. It would not run more than a
couple
On 2/15/07, Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least some basic information, eg. how you compiled ClamAV, did you use
--enable-experimental, platform details, etc.
I have the same problem on my systems. Or, rather, I have the dying
problem. It could be load related, but I'm not sure.
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:19 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:13:38 -0800
Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:00 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800
Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:00:49 -0800
Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compile options: ./configure --enable-experimental
Please recompile without the experimental code and let us know if the problem
still happens.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(\/)\.
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 4:07 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:00:49 -0800
Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compile options: ./configure --enable-experimental
Please recompile without the experimental code and let us know if the problem
still happens.
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
