On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:57 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
[...]
Yes, saw these on other packages from F11 and I hadn't time to figure
out how to circumvent that (which is the main reason for using F10
FWIW, it's here
Just wonder, if use EPEL repository src rpm, why don't use the binary rpm
from repo directly?
BTW, some of servers of our clients also running FC3, which using the
source tar from clamav.net, seem work so far so good.
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 07:50 -0500, M. Lewis
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 01:33 -0700, martinnitram wrote:
[...]
Just wonder, if use EPEL repository src rpm, why don't use the binary rpm
from repo directly?
Never tried that recently.
If I have to guess: missing dependencies, need for newer packages, some
packages may have been renamed and
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on
this system.
Previously all upgrades were done via RPM, which of course has not
M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on
this system.
Previously all upgrades were done via RPM, which
aCaB wrote:
M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on
this system.
Previously all upgrades were done
On 2009-05-25 15:01, M. Lewis wrote:
aCaB wrote:
M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on
On 25.05.2009 / 07:01:05 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
aCaB wrote:
M. Lewis wrote:
Hi,
you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will
get any sort of compilation errors. Working them around is not trivial BTW.
If you can somehow get a gcc 3.x installed then
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:54 +0200, aCaB wrote:
[]
you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will
FC4 has gcc-4.0.2. So FC3 should have a gcc-3.
Just do `rpm -q gcc` or `yum install gcc` and see what it has/delivers.
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4.
this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:54 +0200, aCaB wrote:
[]
you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will
FC4 has gcc-4.0.2. So FC3 should have a gcc-3.
Just do `rpm -q gcc` or `yum install gcc` and see what it has/delivers.
Bernd
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4.
this, but I'm wondering if there
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4.
this, but I'm wondering if there
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 07:19 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
I'm doing the
14 matches
Mail list logo
