On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 at 13:20:45 -0500, jef moskot wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
Added are viruses which users submitted to us :-) . Or found by us.
Well, yes, obviously, but could you maybe take a recent representative
update and give us an idea of what the added
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 at 13:56:47 -0500, jef moskot wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
are you on the clamav-virusdb mailing list?
Yes, but it doesn't say whether the viruses are old or new, and looking
them up given the various names used and the quantity of updates is not
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 at 16:45:30 -0500, jef moskot wrote:
Out of curiosity, what sort of viruses are typically being added to the
database? Are they mostly new viruses?
Added are viruses which users submitted to us :-) . Or found by us.
Of course we add new viruses as quickly as possible
Are you subscribed to clamav-virusdb? If not, try that first.
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV 0.65 + GMP
jef moskot wrote:
Well, yes, obviously, but could you maybe take a
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:20, jef moskot wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
Added are viruses which users submitted to us :-) . Or found by us.
Well, yes, obviously, but could you maybe take a recent representative
update and give us an idea of what the added viruses are
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
are you on the clamav-virusdb mailing list?
Yes, but it doesn't say whether the viruses are old or new, and looking
them up given the various names used and the quantity of updates is not
very convenient.
Tomasz Kojm sent out an update on Saturday
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:56:47PM -0500, jef moskot wrote :
[...]
Thanks, that puts things into a little perspective.
I'm really just looking for a GENERAL idea. For example, if you had to
explain to the average user what sort of viruses were being added to the
database...is it MOSTLY
At 11:02 AM 12/01/04, Flinn Mueller wrote:
Maybe a browsable virus database would be in order. Something ala
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/. The description data
from sendvirus.cgi would need to go right in there. Anyone working on
something like this already? Even making
c2o Technical Support wrote:
At 11:02 AM 12/01/04, Flinn Mueller wrote:
Maybe a browsable virus database would be in order. Something ala
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/. The description data
from sendvirus.cgi would need to go right in there. Anyone working on
something
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Denis De Messemacker wrote:
In conclusion, and to answer your question, we receive actually a
majority of current worms,trojans and viruses that are still in activity.
Those are analysed on a fifo base.
At any time, if fast spreading new virus is received, it preempts the
I don't see any reason to re-invent the wheel. If there are no legal or
technical problems with linking to another commercial site, I think it
makes more sense to just add an URL to our list, as opposed to generating
fresh content for thousands of entries.
Jeffrey Moskot
System Administrator
On Jan 12, 2004, at 7:48 PM, jef moskot wrote:
I don't see any reason to re-invent the wheel. If there are no legal
or
technical problems with linking to another commercial site, I think it
makes more sense to just add an URL to our list, as opposed to
generating
fresh content for thousands of
Heya,
At 01:27 PM 13/01/04, you wrote:
I don't see any reason to re-invent the wheel. If there are no legal
or
technical problems with linking to another commercial site, I think it
makes more sense to just add an URL to our list, as opposed to
generating
fresh content for thousands of
Out of curiosity, what sort of viruses are typically being added to the
database? Are they mostly new viruses?
Sometimes it's obvious when a user has submitted a large library of old
viruses, but in general it's tough to tell whether the latest crop of
updates have been recently discovered or if
Maybe a browsable virus database would be in order. Something ala
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/. The description data
from sendvirus.cgi would need to go right in there. Anyone working on
something like this already? Even making accepting a link to a
commercial av's db
15 matches
Mail list logo
