The only reason that I care is that when there is hew and cry over a
massively destructive virus, I can point at my virus statistics and say
oh, our AV calls CME-24 'worm.vb9' - we've been blocking it for weeks.
Then I don't have to worry about what name another group might give it,
and the
I've just been asked if we're scanning for tomorrow's outbreak
alert and still have not found anything official. I've found in
the mailing lists that CME-24 is synonymous with worm.vb-8 and
worm.vb-9 but it took some digging. I know I for one would
appreciate it if clamav participated
Eric Cunningham wrote:
I have yet to see so many AV vendors cooperate to this extent before.
I've scanned several major vendor's websites for cme-24 and they all
list among their aliases cme-24 in a prominent display.
I don't really see the harm aside from Mitre conspiracies. Just my $.02
tomorrow's outbreak alert?
For lack of better phrasing... CME-24 is set to execute tomorrow and
has been rather hyped by the media.
I don't see any harm either...just no value. Course, I have to admit
that I frequently have friction with bosses that task me with things
that really
Jason Haar wrote:
Hi there
I've been watching CME (Common Malware Enumerator) starting to take off
over the past few weeks, and I've noticed CME entries and their
corresponding names used by antivirus vendors.
...and ClamAV ain't in there from what I've seen...
Correct.
Is there no
Jason Haar wrote:
I've been watching CME (Common Malware Enumerator) starting
to take off over the past few weeks, and I've noticed CME
entries and their corresponding names used by antivirus vendors.
...and ClamAV ain't in there from what I've seen...
Is there no interest in
I've been watching CME (Common Malware Enumerator) starting
to take off over the past few weeks, and I've noticed CME
entries and their corresponding names used by antivirus vendors.
...and ClamAV ain't in there from what I've seen...
Is there no interest in supporting this, or am I just
On Feb 1, 2006, at 4:32 AM, Randal, Phil wrote:
Jason Haar wrote:
I've been watching CME (Common Malware Enumerator) starting
to take off over the past few weeks, and I've noticed CME
entries and their corresponding names used by antivirus vendors.
...and ClamAV ain't in there from what
* On 01/02/06 07:52 -0600, John Jolet wrote:
On Feb 1, 2006, at 4:32 AM, Randal, Phil wrote:
Jason Haar wrote:
I've been watching CME (Common Malware Enumerator) starting
to take off over the past few weeks, and I've noticed CME
entries and their corresponding names used by antivirus
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 17:45 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* On 01/02/06 07:52 -0600, John Jolet wrote:
I fail to see how everyone using the same names protects my users any
more than they already are by my using the best antivirus server-side
solution out there. Who cares what you
On Feb 1, 2006, at 9:11 AM, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 17:45 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* On 01/02/06 07:52 -0600, John Jolet wrote:
I fail to see how everyone using the same names protects my users
any
more than they already are by my using the best antivirus
On 2/1/06, Krištof Petr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mitre? Are not these boys same as Mitre security experts from Clifford
Stoll's
book CUCKOO'S EGG?
Mitre is a major US DoD contractor.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Jason Haar wrote:
Hi there
I've been watching CME (Common Malware Enumerator) starting to take off
over the past few weeks, and I've noticed CME entries and their
corresponding names used by antivirus vendors.
...and ClamAV ain't in there from what I've seen...
Is there no interest in
13 matches
Mail list logo