On 20.7.2010 21:35, Laurence MOINDROT wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1),
greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster
We would appreciate any feedback on your experience using clamav with
sanesecurity.
I use
Hi there,
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 Laurence MOINDROT wrote:
I will setup a test platform ...
If greylisting, RBLs, ClamAV and phishing signatures don't do it
then you might try Sendmail's greetpause. It works well for me.
I also use a multi-line response to the initial connection which
bamboozles
Am 20.07.2010 20:35, schrieb Laurence MOINDROT:
Hi Everyone,
We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1),
greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster
(OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and
antivirus solution was quiet
On 7/20/2010 7:12 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
Checked out GreyListing and Sanesecurity. Both look like really cool tools.
However, we have been using SpamAssassin, ClamAV, with sendmail (Fedora Core
8), and zan.spamhaus.org RBL, which does most of the heavy work, of blocking
incoming SPAM.
Em 20/07/2010 15:35, Laurence MOINDROT escreveu:
Hi Everyone,
We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1),
greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster
(OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and
antivirus solution was quiet
Quoting Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
I've been using the sanesecurity lists since shortly after they
became publicly available.
I've found them to be safe and very effective.
I've also been using them from the start. There were, early on, a
couple false positives that sanesecurity
Eric Rostetter wrote:
I recently
had a false positive also (a base64 encoded pdf string that happened
to match on a certain drug name). But, the FP rate is probable about
1 per year, so all in all not bad at all if you either reject
them or quarantine them (as opposed to tossing them in the
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:35:49 +0200
Laurence MOINDROT moind...@unistra.fr articulated:
Hi Everyone,
We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1),
greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster
(OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This
Laurence,
Just a thought. Do you have any rbl listing(s) in your sendmail.mc file
hardcoded? This has helped us out lots,in addition to clamav and
spamassassin,of course.
If not I can email you on how to setup or google on how to accomplish
this.
Take Care,
Barry
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 20:35
On 7/20/2010 1:35 PM, Laurence MOINDROT wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1),
greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's
cluster (OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg.
This antispam and antivirus solution was quiet sure
Barry,
Just a thought. Do you have any rbl listing(s) in your sendmail.mc file
hardcoded?
We didn't use this option yet.
This has helped us out lots,in addition to clamav and
spamassassin,of course.
If not I can email you on how to setup or google on how to accomplish
this.
Thanks, that
Hi Everyone,
We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1),
greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster
(OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and
antivirus solution was quiet sure until last month.
We've been having intensive
...@unistra.fr
To: clamav.u...@seibercom.net
CC: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience
Hi Everyone,
We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1),
greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's
] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience
Hi Everyone,
We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1),
greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster
(OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and
antivirus solution was quiet
14 matches
Mail list logo
