Re: [clamav-users] Identify Threat Risk Level with ClamAV

On 14 April 2017 17:31:21 Reindl Harald wrote: SanSecurity creating signature database files based and it showing risk status of malware sanesecurity shows *risk of false-positives* don't confuse such basics That's correct it's a *very rough* fp guide for each

Re: [clamav-users] Identify Threat Risk Level with ClamAV

Am 14.04.2017 um 18:33 schrieb crazy thinker: Oh.. ok..But how Commercial AV Calculating risk level of malware and what is the criteria for that.? frankly i don't want to know at all what nonsense criteria all that ratware which is most of the time more security risk and malware itself

Re: [clamav-users] Identify Threat Risk Level with ClamAV

This is probably not the best list for this conversation. You make get better results by talking with developers, not end-users. dp On 4/14/17 9:33 AM, crazy thinker wrote: Oh.. ok..But how Commercial AV Calculating risk level of malware and what is the criteria for that.? On 14 April

Re: [clamav-users] Identify Threat Risk Level with ClamAV

Oh.. ok..But how Commercial AV Calculating risk level of malware and what is the criteria for that.? On 14 April 2017 at 22:00, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 14.04.2017 um 18:28 schrieb crazy thinker: > >> All Commericial AV's showign risk status of malware >> >>

Re: [clamav-users] Identify Threat Risk Level with ClamAV

Am 14.04.2017 um 18:28 schrieb crazy thinker: All Commericial AV's showign risk status of malware SanSecurity creating signature database files based and it showing risk status of malware sanesecurity shows *risk of false-positives* don't confuse such basics On 14 April 2017 at 21:17,

Re: [clamav-users] Identify Threat Risk Level with ClamAV

All Commericial AV's showign risk status of malware SanSecurity creating signature database files based and it showing risk status of malware please find below reference link Sansecurity Signatures On 14 April 2017 at 21:17, SCOTT PACKARD

Re: [clamav-users] Identify Threat Risk Level with ClamAV

Am 14.04.2017 um 17:44 schrieb crazy thinker: @joel No. all malware would not be large risk.. for an example, EICAR test file is sample virus file.it can't make big damage to system. I think malware can be classified into folllowing formats like low level threat, high level threat and

Re: [clamav-users] Identify Threat Risk Level with ClamAV

> No. all malware would not be large risk.. for an example, EICAR test file > is sample virus file.it can't make big damage to system. Can you present another example, other than the EICAR test file? ___ clamav-users mailing list

Re: [clamav-users] Identify Threat Risk Level with ClamAV

@joel No. all malware would not be large risk.. for an example, EICAR test file is sample virus file.it can't make big damage to system. I think malware can be classified into folllowing formats like low level threat, high level threat and high level threat based on malware's impact Thanks

Re: [clamav-users] Identify Threat Risk Level with ClamAV

Wouldn’t all malware be a large risk? -- Joel Esler | Talos: Manager | jes...@cisco.com On Apr 14, 2017, at 12:47 AM, crazy thinker > wrote: Hi ClamAV Developers,Users I know that ClamAV is a very powerful