Hi all,
Implementing the Thread.interrupt inside my vm, I noticed nothing is
actually done inside
classpath (except for native/jni/java-nio/gnu_java_nio_VMSelector.c)
for dealing with
interruption of a thread executing an InterruptibleChannel method. I
tried to look what other
VMs do, but i f
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 19:36 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> - What about Graphics2D (move to cairo 1.0/gtk+2.8)? imageio? qt4-peers?
> For 0.19 we are still on gtk+ 2.4/6 for the gtk+ awt peers.
> We can revamp and upgrade to gtk+2.8.x, cairo 1.0.x after 0.19.
> Neither Tom Fitzsimmons n
Hi Mark, hi all
Thank you for your welcome messages.
To say a little more about me, I'm the maintainer of a java virtual
machine called JnJVM using gnu classpath as its core classes.
The vm has originally been developped by Gael Thomas. You can
get more informations on his home page
http://www-s
>> The first is a bug in GCJ (or maybe GNU Classpath, haven't tested
>> on Jam or Kaffe yet) - when working with a java.util.Calendar, not
>> all of the fields were being set correctly when they should be:
According to Sven, this bug was fixed a while back in Classpath.
It wasn't back-porte
Hi all,
The "release meeting" on irc last Wednesday wasn't very formal. And it
seemed most people agreed on what the do for 0.19. Here is the summary:
- We are aiming for Nov 2 (Wednesday in two weeks).
But can be anywhere in that week if issues show up.
- There are no know big bad bugs at the
gnu_java_nio_charset_iconv_IconvDecoder.c has this coding:
if (errno == EILSEQ || errno == EINVAL)
retval = 1;
else
retval = 0;
But errno == EINVAL is a normal status which should result in
CoderResult.UNDERFLOW and not in CoderResult.MALFORMED.
errno == EINVAL being
Really a wonderful morning!
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi all,
Now that we are growing so fast it is probably a good idea to introduce
new developers "officially" on the list so everybody knows when the GNU
Classpath family gains a new member.
___
Cl
On Do, Okt 20, 2005 at 09:06:55 +0200, Julian Scheid wrote:
> David Gilbert wrote:
> >One question - what's left to do before a 1.0.0 release? I think it's
> >ready now...
>
> I just got a bug report about an NPE and, while fixing it, noticed that
> the documentation for abstract methods didn't
8 matches
Mail list logo
