Stephen Crawley wrote:
Etienne,
Please take this discussion off the classpath mailing lists.
I respectfully disagree with this request. There are clearly issues
between the SableVM hackers and other Classpath-using VM authors and
Classpath contributors, and everybody knows that there have been
Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 16:18 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
Etienne == Etienne Gagnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Etienne As usual, Mark has forgotten to include SableVM in the list
Etienne of runtimes that use GNU Classpath. It is understandable, I
Etienne guess, as he does not use
Chris Pickett wrote:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 16:18 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
Etienne == Etienne Gagnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Etienne As usual, Mark has forgotten to include SableVM in the list
Etienne of runtimes that use GNU Classpath. It is understandable, I
Etienne guess
C. Brian Jones wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 13:12, Mark Wielaard wrote:
GNU Classpath delivers core libraries for upcoming GCC and Kaffe releases
We are pleased to announce a new developer snapshot release of GNU
Classpath.
I think we're all excited about the upcoming gcc and kaffe releases.
Tom Tromey wrote:
Bryce == Bryce McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bryce Certainly, bytecode isn't allowed to do this kind of thing, but I'm
Bryce not sure if the structured locking rules in the VM spec are meant to
Bryce apply to native code. For example, wait() would be impossible to
Bryce
Chris Pickett wrote:
Tom Tromey wrote:
Bryce == Bryce McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bryce Certainly, bytecode isn't allowed to do this kind of thing, but
I'm
Bryce not sure if the structured locking rules in the VM spec are
meant to
Bryce apply to native code. For example, wait() would
David P Grove wrote:
I should have confined myself to giving you a pointer to the benchmark
suite. Discussion of licensing issues of non-classpath code is
basically off topic spam on this list and I apologize for starting it.
There are better places for these kinds of never ending
Chris Pickett wrote:
I think this kind of automated testing/regression testing for Classpath
VM's is a great idea.
s/automated testing/automated compatability/
If it's possible, some performance numbers would be interesting so we
find discrepancies between there VM's there as well.
s/between
Hi David,
That's a non-free license.
http://osl-www.cs.umass.edu/DaCapo/gcbm.html#License_and_copyright
This is generally what's accepted to define free software:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
Maybe we need a replacement for DaCapo as well. Thanks for the
suggestion though, it's
David P Grove wrote:
I think you need to understand the point of the benchmark suite. The
whole goal is reproducible science, so if someone doesn't cite the exact
version of the benchmarks, then it isn't useful (in an academic sense).
The license forces that plus proper academic credit (ie a
Chris Pickett wrote:
Perhaps a replacement for DaCapo and SPECjvm98 is not in order: this
would make comparison with other papers in the literature difficult and
just confuse the issue. So, how about a good *companion* suite then?
By the way, Ashes was started as a free testing framework
Chris Pickett wrote:
Chris Pickett wrote:
Perhaps a replacement for DaCapo and SPECjvm98 is not in order: this
would make comparison with other papers in the literature difficult
and just confuse the issue. So, how about a good *companion* suite then?
By the way, Ashes was started as a free
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering why the 'description' is the last entry where I expected it
to be the first, just below the title of the product. Any problem with me
changing that?
I'd like to make it more of a single-line advertisement for the
application as well; this makes developers of
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 15:13 +0100, Chris Gray wrote:
Sorry I didn't make it to Fosdem, everybody. Came back from Nuernberg with a
nasty case of griep ('flu), from which I'm only just recovering. See you
all at the next get-together, I hope.
Thanks for not
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 23:06 -0500, Chris Pickett wrote:
Can some people run the attached (and shockingly simple) code 1000 times
on some multiprocessor machines using free VM's other than SableVM,
where the VM will get control of two or more processors, and report
Hi,
Can some people run the attached (and shockingly simple) code 1000 times
on some multiprocessor machines using free VM's other than SableVM,
where the VM will get control of two or more processors, and report if
there are any exceptions or segfaults?
I use:
$ for num in `seq 1 1000`; do
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if some other Classpath developers could confirm
this bug. I'm trying to rule it out as being JC-specific. The problem
is that the Logger has a level of null instead of FINE:
With JDK 1.4.2:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] level=FINE
Feb 5, 2005 2:53:25 PM LogInit
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Chris Pickett wrote:
I was wondering if some other Classpath developers could confirm
this bug. I'm trying to rule it out as being JC-specific. The problem
is that the Logger has a level of null instead of FINE:
With JDK 1.4.2:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] level=FINE
Feb 5, 2005 2:53
Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:44 +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:
Would anyone have problems with me committing a mauve test that opens a
Window for a very little time?
No, we can't do this yet, but it's something we should work on. We need
to put a gui testing framework in
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Thomas Zander wrote:
Kaffe: looks dead; last development release almost a year ago (not to
mention stable releases)
And I've heard that netcraft confirms it's dead ... :)
What's it like being dead? I've heard that your hair and fingernails
don't really keep growing, it's
Thomas Zander wrote:
Would anyone have problems with me committing a mauve test that opens a
Window for a very little time?
See attached test.
Next to that; I would like to ask for your expertise to see if I made a
mistake, or if there is a bug in classpath/jamvm.
The statement on line 75
Jeroen Frijters wrote:
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Perhaps we should add a comment to the Javadoc for Thread.java
like instances of Thread are not garbage collected until either
they run and terminate or their ThreadGroup and all contained
Threads are no longer referenced.
Agreed. I'm (almost) always in
Robert Lougher wrote:
Hi all,
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:58:53 +0100, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Eclipse 3 (but not 2) startup problem seems to only happen on SMP
machine (it disappears when I don't use a SMP kernel, this is on a Intel
hyperthreading system) with jamvm [*]. It works
sorry, please CC responses to that last message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chris
Chris Pickett wrote:
Robert Lougher wrote:
Hi all,
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:58:53 +0100, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Eclipse 3 (but not 2) startup problem seems to only happen
or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
even. my apologies, i'm really tired, i already retyped the whole email
once b/c i made thunderbird die.
chris
Chris Pickett wrote:
sorry, please CC responses to that last message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chris
Chris Pickett wrote:
Robert
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Per Bothner wrote:
If the strtod in glibc is threadsafe *and* accurate, then we should
probably use it, at least as a default.
Dalibor Topic said on IRC that it has some problems on Irix. So it might
not be a good idea. So perhaps adding a special case would be best, or
you
Valentin Chira wrote:
Hi guys, I wanna try to port a Java VM to BeOS R5 but I have problem finding
a VM that is full featured and easy to port. Can you help me with an advice?
Hi Valentin,
Try SableVM, it's highly portable if POSIX libraries are available.
http://www.sablevm.org
You can probably
Chris Gray wrote:
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:36, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
Ben Hinkle wrote:
I'd like to port the Collections implementation in Classpath to another
language called D that is very similar to Java and I'm trying to figure
out the Classpath license. My question is simple: what license
David Daney wrote:
Stephen Crawley writes:
I'm also going to submit a bug report about the JDK's widespread abuse
of RuntimeException. IMO, they should either throw InternalError (or
its replacement) or they should define some appropriate subtypes of
RuntimeException and throw those.
I agree.
Chris Pickett wrote:
I couldn't find ifnotplaintext in google, and I couldn't find it in
`info texinfo` using 'i ifnotplaintext' either.
Tomorrow I'll try installing the latest texinfo (4.7) and see if that
fixes things.
I checked in Google again and ifnotplaintext turned up a link to texinfo
30 matches
Mail list logo
