f Of *Anthony Lee
> *Sent:* 24 February 2018 01:53
> *To:* clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Project Clearwater] Is it a bug that Clearwater
> invalidate the ODI once it receives 200OK response?
>
>
>
> From TS 124.229 V12.6.0, the spec doesn't say
Of Anthony Lee
Sent: 24 February 2018 01:53
To: clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
Subject: Re: [Project Clearwater] Is it a bug that Clearwater invalidate the
ODI once it receives 200OK response?
From TS 124.229 V12.6.0, the spec doesn't say anything about the 200OK response
from the re
>From TS 124.229 V12.6.0, the spec doesn't say anything about the 200OK
response from the request.
It only talks about the subsequent request should be co-related with the
previous request by using ODI in route header.
To me it looks like a bug.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Anthony Lee wrote:
In my case, there is a application service in terminating side doing
message Store-And-Forward.
So when the service receives an Invite it replies 200OK response
immiediately and then it create a new Invite to the user.
Since scscf invalidated the AS chain when it receives 200OK response the
Invit
