Re: [Project Clearwater] Bono responds to INVITE from SCSCF with 403 Forbidden

2019-01-22 Thread Brian Grant
Hi Mark, Thank you for the response - it seems that the simulation tool is incorrectly forming the INVITE "To URI". Regards, Brian. ___ Clearwater mailing list Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org

Re: [Project Clearwater] Bono responds to INVITE from SCSCF with 403 Forbidden

2019-01-21 Thread Mark Perryman
water.org Cc: Mark Perryman Subject: Re: [Project Clearwater] Bono responds to INVITE from SCSCF with 403 Forbidden NOTE: Message is from an external sender Hi Mark, I don't have an entry in DNS for Bono port 5058 - is this required? Reg

Re: [Project Clearwater] Bono responds to INVITE from SCSCF with 403 Forbidden

2019-01-21 Thread Brian Grant
Hi Mark, I don't have an entry in DNS for Bono port 5058 - is this required? Regards, Brian. ___ Clearwater mailing list Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org

Re: [Project Clearwater] Bono responds to INVITE from SCSCF with 403 Forbidden

2019-01-17 Thread Brian Grant
Hi Mark, Thank you again for your response. Comments inline. ? I assume that bono is 192.168.8.106. Yes Bono is 192.168.8.106. ? It seems that sprout is trying to route to the IP address in the URI as an off-net peer (that just happens to be bono), rather than treating the call as an

Re: [Project Clearwater] Bono responds to INVITE from SCSCF with 403 Forbidden

2019-01-17 Thread Mark Perryman
now if you need more. Regards, Brian. From: Brian Grant Sent: 17 January 2019 08:44 To: clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org<mailto:clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org> Cc: mark.perry...@metaswitch.com<mailto:mark.perry...@metaswitch.com> Subject: Re: [Project Clearwater] B

Re: [Project Clearwater] Bono responds to INVITE from SCSCF with 403 Forbidden

2019-01-15 Thread Mark Perryman
No, you shouldn't have to configure Sprout as a trusted peer. However, Sprout should be talking to bono over trusted port 5058, rather than 5060. It is not clear from those logs why this is not the case. Does the call work if you do not invoke the Application Server? Please send sprout logs