On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 9, 8:48 am, Brett Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You seem to be asking for the
compiler to be able to prove that your computation finishes, and if it
doesn't then give you a sane response.
No.
Would you
On Sep 9, 10:51 am, Brett Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you kindly educate me in how you believe that Clojure would go
about trapping your error and giving you an error message instead of
running out of stack space, given that you had given it a
non-terminating dependency list?
First
It doesn't seem *impossible* for require and use to keep a var set of
namespaces it's loading and check if the current is already in the set
then give an error.
However, I don't think clojure supports circular dependency since
loading is sequential. I know there's a trick for functions to be
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 01:51, Brett Morgan wrote:
...
Would you kindly educate me in how you believe that Clojure would go
about trapping your error and giving you an error message instead of
running out of
The binding trick seems to work. I had already tried using (in-ns)
before, but didn't realize about needing the binding, so got a nasty
error of course.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
Whatever you do, don't kill Clojure while trying to save us from
ourselves.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
Rich mentioned a desire for the ns-* functions to accept either a
symbol or a namespace for arguments where they currently accept a
namespace.
Using a multimethod that dispatches on the class of that argument is
one way to do that.
Here's an example:
(defmulti ns-aliases class)
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 23:57 +1000, Brett Morgan wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 9, 11:26 am, Brett Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For C, protection against circular dependencies is on the head of the
programmer, in the form of
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:38 PM, ntupel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 23:57 +1000, Brett Morgan wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 9, 11:26 am, Brett Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For C, protection against
