C-c C-x keybindings for swank-cdt don't work

Hi--After several attempts, I've gotten CDB working...sort of, and I'm stuck. Following the example on http://georgejahad.com/clojure/swank-cdt.html, I execute the following: (use 'clojure.set) (use 'swank.cdt) (set-bp clojure.set/difference) which execute OK. When I execute: user> (difference

[ANN] Cheshire 2.1.0 released

Hi all, I'm pleased to announce the 2.1.0 release of Cheshire. Cheshire is a very fast JSON and SMILE encoding library that supports custom type encoding. You should be able to use it from Clojars[2] with the following: [cheshire "2.1.0"] New features and bug-fixes (since the last announcement o

Re: Clojure for Cocoa

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Matthias Benkard wrote: > Am 25.01.12 15:43, schrieb D.Theisen: >> How did you handle the reference counting vs. Garbage Collection >> chasm? > > I punted on it.  GNUstep already had GC support at the time, and it > was upcoming on Mac OS X.  I didn't foresee the r

Re: Null-safe threading macro?

Thanks, I've never heard of symbolhound.com, that will definitely come in handy. On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Gary Trakhman wrote: > Probably you know of it by now, but I just found out about > http://symbolhound.com/ . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Re: Help coding Eller's maze algorithm.

On Jan 24, 4:57 pm, Gabriele Carrettoni wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to code the algorithm described > here > with > no luck. > I'm struggling to find the best data structure to hold each cell, how to > random join cells and ho

Re: Null-safe threading macro?

Probably you know of it by now, but I just found out about http://symbolhound.com/ . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - pleas

Re: Clojure for Cocoa

Hi! Am 25.01.12 15:43, schrieb D.Theisen: > How did you handle the reference counting vs. Garbage Collection > chasm? I punted on it. GNUstep already had GC support at the time, and it was upcoming on Mac OS X. I didn't foresee the restrictions imposed by iOS. :) I did consider integrating Boe

Re: Clojure for Cocoa

Yeah, the project is only about a month old. Just this week I've got my first collaborator, so we've started working on writing down know bugs, implementation notes, etc. I'll sit down tonight and figure out a road map, and then make a quick announcement asking for anyone who wants to help. In the

Re: Clojure for Cocoa

LOL, clojure-py is the project I was planning for some time. I'm very glad someone started it first :) Will be any wiki pages or mailing list any time soon so interest parties could get into current internals and planned roadmap? Thanks, Sanel On Jan 24, 3:37 pm, Timothy Baldridge wrote: > > Cl

Re: Adding primitive type hints to anonymous functions

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote: > Cedric Greevey writes: > >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote: >>> At least, it seems that (fn ^double [^double x] (+ x 0.5)) compiles to a >>> class supporting primitive, unboxed calls. >> >> Yes. That was my conclusion al

Re: New Version of ClojureScript One

On 25 Jan 2012, at 22:27, Brenton wrote: > ClojureScript will continue to change rapidly. We are already > depending on a newer version than the one in Maven. Also, I don't > think that Domina has a release yet. > > For times when we only need a source dependency and only at > development time,

Re: Adding primitive type hints to anonymous functions

Cedric Greevey writes: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote: >> At least, it seems that (fn ^double [^double x] (+ x 0.5)) compiles to a >> class supporting primitive, unboxed calls. > > Yes. That was my conclusion also. But apparently the only way to get > the compiler to emit

Re: Adding primitive type hints to anonymous functions

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote: > At least, it seems that (fn ^double [^double x] (+ x 0.5)) compiles to a > class supporting primitive, unboxed calls. Yes. That was my conclusion also. But apparently the only way to get the compiler to emit such a call is by binding the fn t