You can take a look at https://github.com/ngrunwald/ring-middleware-format
which tries to handle content negociation only in a sane and flexible way
for REST api.
On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 2:47:02 PM UTC+1, Miguel Ping wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> What's the best way to do conte
Liberator is very helpful for this:
http://clojure-liberator.github.io/liberator/
2014-11-05 14:47 GMT+01:00 Miguel Ping :
> Hi all,
>
> What's the best way to do content-negotiation on compojure-based web
> frameworks? I know liberator deals with it in a special way, I was
Hi all,
What's the best way to do content-negotiation on compojure-based web
frameworks? I know liberator deals with it in a special way, I was
wondering if is there anything out there to deal with it like rails does.
Right now I have a big cond:
(defn handle-home [req]
(let [content
http://github.com/rnewman/clj-conneg/tree/master
This is now pretty much finished, apart from more detailed sorting.
E.g., you can ask:
(conneg/best-allowed-content-type
"image/*; q=0.9, text/html; q=0.1, text/plain; q=0.8"
#{"image/jpeg"})
=>
("image" "jpeg")
i.e., it co
> This might be good to integrate with ring as well?
I don't use Ring directly, if at all (just Compojure for now), so it
needs to be upstream of that. I have no problem with Ring using it,
though. (I imagine that would be trivial if it reached contrib.)
--~--~-~--~~~
>> Could you put it on GitHub anyway? It would be a good way to
>> evaluate
>> it.
>
> +1 - I'd be interested in using it.
Your wish is my command :)
http://github.com/rnewman/clj-conneg/tree/master
I haven't finished the complete sorting algorithm yet (it only uses q-
vals, not level and '
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Sean Devlin wrote:
>>
>> Could you put it on GitHub anyway? It would be a good way to evaluate
>> it.
>>
>> On Sep 10, 12:36 am, Richard Newman wrote:
>>> Would anyone have any interest in a content negotiation library making
>
Sep 10, 12:36 am, Richard Newman wrote:
>> Would anyone have any interest in a content negotiation library making
>> its way into contrib?
>>
>> That is, a library with a public function that takes an Accept: header
>> from an HTTP request, and your server-side pre
Could you put it on GitHub anyway? It would be a good way to evaluate
it.
On Sep 10, 12:36 am, Richard Newman wrote:
> Would anyone have any interest in a content negotiation library making
> its way into contrib?
>
> That is, a library with a public function that takes an Ac
Would anyone have any interest in a content negotiation library making
its way into contrib?
That is, a library with a public function that takes an Accept: header
from an HTTP request, and your server-side preferences, and spits out
which Content-Type you should produce.
This is
10 matches
Mail list logo
