On Monday, November 11, 2013 6:38:23 AM UTC-8, Brenton wrote:
If you are looking for something that is finished and stable then do not
look at Pedestal. We will indicate stability with version numbers. When you
see a release of version 1.0 then you may want to have another look. A 1.0
(a clojure/script data type) to the
DOM.
It seems that all 3 Projects could use react.js because:
*react.js is the immediate mode abstraction over the retained mode
dom*(Chris Granger)
Does Pedestal have a future in the long run?
I hope that pedestal will be simple, and open to a solution to use
because:
*react.js is the immediate mode abstraction over the retained mode dom*(Chris
Granger)
Does Pedestal have a future in the long run?
I hope that pedestal will be simple, and open to a solution to use react.js
or any immediate mode abstraction lib that will come along.
--
--
You received
As for UI.
Isnt reactjs (facebook renderer library) a good fit for pedestal ?
it appears to use the same ideas of webfui. Webfui's author even
complimented reacjts guys for their work:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/reactjs/conrad/reactjs/e3bYersyd64/fH83IFqXb2oJ
There are a
Very exaustive comment, that reminded me of a beautiful series of articles
by Jacob Kaplan-Moss on Writing great
documentationhttp://jacobian.org/writing/great-documentation/.
There is a
presentationhttp://pyvideo.org/video/403/pycon-2011--writing-great-documentation,
too.
Il giorno lunedì
I would like to clarify a few things.
All of the comments below are about Pedestal app.
Pedestal is a continuation of ClojureScript One. The reason that we didn't
continue to commit changes to that project was because of all of the
documentation.
Pedestal has changed a lot from the beginning
Thank you for your explanation Brenton, makes a whole lot of sense. Now
it's clear what the maturity level of Pedestal is: I'll way a little bit
more before starting to bleed :)
Il giorno lunedì 11 novembre 2013 15:38:23 UTC+1, Brenton ha scritto:
I would like to clarify a few things.
All
As the author of another Clojure web framework, clojure on Coils (
https://github.com/zubairq/coils) I would say that Pedestal has got a very
bright future ahead of it. Not only is it technically pretty amazing but
the community behind it and the fact that it comes from the same team as
the
Thanks, Cedric, for insightful comments about documentation.
I'll add that for me, if the only documentation is a video, I have to
*really* want to learn about a programming tool to go any further. Videos
don't allow you to take in information any faster than information at
exactly the speed
I hope that this time around the Pedestal talk will be recorded. The lack of
any nice recorded video talks discussing Pedestal has been an additional
barrier to entry.
- Farley
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this
Thank you Saravana. I'm finding a number of the posts David Nolen [1] has
written on his blog to be invaluable. Once I figure out what mix of
libraries I'll be using I can let you know!
[1] http://swannodette.github.io/
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Ryan Neufeld r...@cognitect.com wrote:
IMO it can often be a lack of readable, searchable, nice-to-navigate
text/hypertext that can be a barrier to entry. In fact all of these are
unfortunately common in various parts of the geekosphere:
1. Projects whose *only* documentation (or the only version of certain key
information) is in
Recently, when I decided to investigate Pedestal for a project, I was
surprised to discover that it isn't supported on Windows. I can't say
whether lack of cross-platform support will have any impact on Pedestal's
long-term viability, but it ruled Pedestal out for me.
--
--
You received this
Stuart Halloway is doing a presentation and we’ll be dumping a lot more new
stuff into the repository. I made a mistake in saying we had an announcement,
it’s more just that we’ll be talking more publicly about what we’re working on
following next week.
-Ryan
On November 8, 2013 at 5:39:34
Shhh! Don't spill the beans.
On Friday, November 8, 2013 1:02:36 AM UTC-5, Daniel wrote:
I suspect Pedestal adoption will really take off once it has a well
designed and advertised widget/ui toolkit. Just my two cents.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Will there by any presentation on Pedestal, or just announcements?
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Ryan Neufeld r...@thinkrelevance.comwrote:
Speaking as a core Pedestal team member and engineer at Cognitect I can
say we are *very* serious about continuing to grow and support Pedestal.
It
Pedestal-app and pedestal-service seem like they have a lot of solid design
behind them and there's quite a few bright people that have put time into
development and documentation. I don't doubt Cognitect's dedication to the
project or their ability to derive productivity from it.
I program in
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Marko Kocić ma...@euptera.com wrote:
related with Pedestal. How serious Cognitect/Relevance is about it?
There is a ton of activity in the repo. Looking forward to v3.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
Hi all,
I'd like to hear opinions about Pedestal from the people that have been
playing more with it. Right now I started looking at it, and like some of
the things, but not sure should I invest more time learning it. While I do
like some concepts, I'm not sure is it going to became
I sure hope it does.
Not a master of it yet, but the concept seems very interesting.
I know that there is a guy writing a book about it.
Many of the other somewhat related technologies like Django are a
completely different cognitive model.
More tutorials would be great, also they should stress
It seems like Congitect is heavily invested in it’s future, and committed to
moving it forward. I suspect it will change significantly as adoption
increases, but that will probably be a good thing.
Clojure is still so new that it’s hard to know if there will be “one web
framework to rule them
Speaking as a core Pedestal team member and engineer at Cognitect I can say
we are *very* serious about continuing to grow and support Pedestal. It may
be quiet, but we're using the entirety of Pedestal with a number of client
and are fervently preparing a number of new features and
I suspect Pedestal adoption will really take off once it has a well designed
and advertised widget/ui toolkit. Just my two cents.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note
23 matches
Mail list logo
