On Saturday 07 February 2009 09:50:29 Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On 07.02.2009, at 01:19, mikel wrote:
> > Can you imagine a
> > Clojure on top of, say the CLR? Or on top of a Common Lisp? Or on GHC
> > or perhaps the LLVM?
>
> There is a JVM on top of the LLVM already, search for vmkit for the
> deta
On 07.02.2009, at 01:19, mikel wrote:
> What happens to Clojure if something bad happens to the JVM?
>
> It's not that I think the JVM is going away any time soon. Sure, Sun
> looks kind of shaky right now, but there are alternative sources of
> JVMs. Probably the JVM can survive even if Sun does
On Saturday 07 February 2009 00:19:44 mikel wrote:
> Can you imagine a Clojure implementation on a different underlying
> runtime? Which ones might possibly be suitable? Can you imagine a
> Clojure on top of, say the CLR? Or on top of a Common Lisp? Or on GHC
> or perhaps the LLVM?
IMHO the world
On Feb 6, 4:19 pm, mikel wrote:
> Can you imagine a Clojure implementation on a different underlying
> runtime? Which ones might possibly be suitable? Can you imagine a
> Clojure on top of, say the CLR? Or on top of a Common Lisp? Or on GHC
> or perhaps the LLVM?
There's Clojure as a language an
Well considering that the JVM is now open source as well as Clojure itself I
wouldn't worry too much :)
That said all languages are simply stepping stones, Clojure happens to be a
particular elegant one that you might want to pause on for a considerable
amount of time, take a deep breath, and enjoy
We'd just have to write our own JVM of course. ;)
On Feb 6, 6:19 pm, mikel wrote:
> What happens to Clojure if something bad happens to the JVM?
>
> It's not that I think the JVM is going away any time soon. Sure, Sun
> looks kind of shaky right now, but there are alternative sources of
> JVMs.
On Feb 6, 2009, at 7:19 PM, mikel wrote:
Can you imagine a Clojure implementation on a different underlying
runtime? Which ones might possibly be suitable? Can you imagine a
Clojure on top of, say the CLR? Or on top of a Common Lisp? Or on GHC
or perhaps the LLVM?
Merely imagining these altern
On Feb 6, 6:24 pm, e wrote:
> What;s Ralph all about? You've certainly peaked *my* interest. Maybe we
> should get that running on top of a JVM so it doesn't go extinct again.
Ralph is what Dylan was called before Apple publicly announced it. It
was essentially Scheme + CLOS + some functiona
I am. but that was also an attempt to (possibly) answer a question with a
question.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Raoul Duke wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:24 PM, e wrote:
> > What;s Ralph all about? You've certainly peaked my interest.
>
> google it up, that's what i immediate
hi,
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:24 PM, e wrote:
> What;s Ralph all about? You've certainly peaked my interest.
google it up, that's what i immediately started doing of course :-)
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:R3Jw4HMdGIwJ:coding.derkeiler.com/pdf/Archive/Lisp/comp.lang.lisp/2005-09/msg003
What;s Ralph all about? You've certainly peaked *my* interest. Maybe we
should get that running on top of a JVM so it doesn't go extinct again.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:19 PM, mikel wrote:
>
> What happens to Clojure if something bad happens to the JVM?
>
> It's not that I think the JVM is goi
What happens to Clojure if something bad happens to the JVM?
It's not that I think the JVM is going away any time soon. Sure, Sun
looks kind of shaky right now, but there are alternative sources of
JVMs. Probably the JVM can survive even if Sun doesn't.
Probably.
But I had a favorite programmin
12 matches
Mail list logo
