Hi,
It was recommended in the past to go through the clojure side of things.
That means for me to call hash-map rather than RT.map. By creating a small
helper class one can get one's own Clj.map while still going through the
official API as recommended. Hence I didn't mention RT.map.
http://vimeo.com/tag:javazone2011/page:0/sort:newest
I am not sure if all the clojure videos are there.
But for sure have plenty videos about scala.
Dont worry ... clojurians will rise up and control the market , next
year!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hello,
I'm happy to inform you that the appeal I've started previous week, for
sending me to the conj, has been a success!
I'm very grateful to all the donors who've contributed to make this dream
possible!
More detail here:
http://code.google.com/p/counterclockwise/wiki/ConjTripFunding
Thank
Congrats, Laurent!
Have fun at the conj! :D
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Luc Prefontaine
lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca wrote:
And yes, defn- should be located elsewhere than in core. +1 for moving it
out of core, at least, defn- should not be make publicly available by core.
I'm of more or less the opposite appearance: anything that
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Andy Fingerhut
andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote:
One more detail. The Scala program, and I think all of the fastest programs
for that problem, use the GNU GMP library for big integer arithmetic.
If that's true, then it indicates that the Java BigInteger class is
I also think it is worth remembering the difficulty people have with getting
started with Clojure (wrt to IDEs). There are *so* many third party
libraries out there at the moment that a beginner could easily be
overwhelmed. The more self contained and feature complete the core is the
better.
(Note: I've copied my question from stackoverflow to get more looks in
case there are people in here that are not on stack.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7471316/how-does-clojure-class-reloading-work
I will sync the good answers)
I've been reading code and documentation to try to understand
Excellent news!
Ambrose
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this
I also think it is worth remembering the difficulty people have with getting
started with Clojure (wrt to IDEs). There are *so* many third party
libraries out there at the moment that a beginner could easily be
overwhelmed. The more self contained and feature complete the core is the
Wouldn't a set of standard entries in a lein project file be sufficient for a
beginner?
I’m not sure that Clojure needs something as packaged as the Haskell Platform
(http://hackage.haskell.org/platform/), and it certainly should not be part of
core.
On 19/09/2011, at 4:33 PM, Stuart
I am looking forward for a debugger like in CLISP , SBCL etc..
Is there any solution out there ?
Are you going to develop such a tool and you need help ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
Here's a fleshed-out version that tests for any type of primitive:
(definterface IPrimitiveTester
(getType [^int x])
(getType [^long x])
(getType [^float x])
(getType [^double x])
(getType [^byte x])
(getType [^short x])
(getType [^char x])
(getType [^boolean x])
(getType
On Sep 19, 5:56 am, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Andy Fingerhut
andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote:
One more detail. The Scala program, and I think all of the fastest programs
for that problem, use the GNU GMP library for big integer arithmetic.
If
2011/9/19 Meikel Brandmeyer (kotarak) m...@kotka.de
Hi,
It was recommended in the past to go through the clojure side of things.
That means for me to call hash-map rather than RT.map. By creating a small
helper class one can get one's own Clj.map while still going through the
official API
You can also do it the other way around, use gen-class
and write yourself a static entry point callable from Java.
That's the right way to do it, IMO. Better yet, write a Java wrapper
to offer Javadocs and to hide any interop code. That means extra work
on both ends, but in Java shops
I just gave so hopefully you have enough for a decent dinner while you're
there! Enjoy and thanks for your work.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi community,
clojure is dynamically typed, so i thought here i might find some good
reasons for that. what can you do if you sacrifice compile time type
safety?
an advantage i see is very, very concise code since you have no type
annotations at
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Dennis Haupt d.haup...@googlemail.com wrote:
what else is there? is it worth sacrificing type safety? and is there
no way to combine both?
check out Dialyzer for Erlang.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 13:10 -0400, Stuart Halloway wrote:
This is a good question. I don't know why I never noticed [update's]
absence. Have other people missed this?
I would say about half the calls to update-in I've written took literal
vectors with one expression in them. Including the two
Excellent! See you at the Conj!
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm happy to inform you that the appeal I've started previous week, for
sending me to the conj, has been a success!
I'm very grateful to all the donors who've contributed to make this
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Dennis Haupt d.haup...@googlemail.com wrote:
an advantage i see is very, very concise code since you have no type
annotations at all. the downside is that exactly this code might be
unreadable - because you just have no idea what it uses and what it
does
22 matches
Mail list logo