On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 13:10 -0400, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> This is a good question. I don't know why I never noticed [update's]
> absence. Have other people missed this?

I would say about half the calls to update-in I've written took literal
vectors with one expression in them.  Including the two earlier today.
While I noticed `update' was missing, it didn't bother me.

-- 
Stephen Compall
^aCollection allSatisfy: [:each|aCondition]: less is better

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to