On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:15, Daniel Solano Gomez cloj...@sattvik.com wrote:
On Wed Sep 28 18:52 2011, Daniel Pittman wrote:
I have problem that I have been thrashing back and forth over the best
design of for a week now, and I can't work out the nicest way to
handle it. Specifically, I
ChrisR christopher.roseng...@gmail.com writes:
Hi there, possibly the flatten documentation is wrong as (flatten nil)
for me is returning the empty list rather than nil. (1.3.0).
Indeed, that's because it uses `filter' which produces a lazy seq. Most
probably, in this case it's just the
I think that backward compatibilities problem do hurt. Some people
will not invest in an unstable language by default and some will be
tempted to give up after experimenting too many problem with it.
We don't choose a language,we choose a full echosystem that include
libraries, IDE tooling,
Thanks for feedback. But now I'm came across a problem. I'm studying
Learn You a Haskell for Great Good! and I'm on chapter Functionally
Solving Problems reading Reverse Polish notation calculator.
I wanted to write it in Clojure. So instead of: http://pastebin.com/QzhbyD6d
I wrote:
Btw. I'm using [match 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT] and Clojure 1.3 but this
import instruction
(use '[match.core :only [match]])
from official website of match library doesn't work, only (use
'[clojure.core.match.core :only [match ] ]) works
and I have given a try to matchure and IT WORKS ;-)
But why do I
There's a problem with destructuring lists (seems like a bug).
If stack is always a vector, it works.
(defn rpn' [ stack symb ]
(match [stack symb]
[ [x y z ] * ] (apply vector (* x y ) z)
[ [x y z ] + ] (apply vector (+ x y ) z)
[ x sum ] [ (reduce + x) ]
Hi Michael
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Michael Jaaka michael.ja...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Btw. I'm using [match 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT] and Clojure 1.3 but this
import instruction
(use '[match.core :only [match]])
from official website of match library doesn't work, only (use
I've opened an issue concerning this bug:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/MATCH-21
Ambrose
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a problem with destructuring lists (seems like a bug).
If stack is always a vector, it works.
Thanks!
On Sep 30, 11:33 am, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
I've opened an issue concerning this bug:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/MATCH-21
Ambrose
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
This probably won't get fixed unless someone does a really good job of
convincing me otherwise. Vector notation is reserved for things which
support random access.
(defn rpn' [ stack symb ]
(match [stack symb]
[([x y z] :seq) * ] (apply vector (* x y ) z)
[([x y z] :seq) + ]
The TorqueBox[1] team is toying with the idea of exposing to Clojure
the abstractions we currently expose to Ruby. We're looking for
feedback from you guys to see what you use now to solve these
problems, what you'd like to see in a possible Clojure App Server,
and if you might actually use it.
hi clojure-users,
i ploughed through this year's strangeloop presentations
today ...
3 presentations that i can recommend for clojure-users:
- Jim Duey EasyMonads (advanced level)
https://github.com/strangeloop/2011-slides/blob/master/Duey-MonadsEasy.pdf
- David Nolen The Mapping Dilemma
Hey all,
I've just released a blog post on how to test Cascalog queries with
Midjehttp://sritchie.github.com/2011/09/30/testing-cascalog-with-midje.html;
big thanks to Brian Marick for providing such a killer testing framework.
Thanks to Clojure and tools like
Thanks for the advice and support everyone! I'm not hopeful at being able to
sway him to a parenthetical language through logic (I've tried!)
Additionally, I definitely would not consider throwing out unmaintainable
decompiled Java code on the sly. That, as Nicolas pointed out, would be the
Do you know if videos will be available?
On Friday, September 30, 2011, faenvie fanny.aen...@gmx.de wrote:
hi clojure-users,
i ploughed through this year's strangeloop presentations
today ...
3 presentations that i can recommend for clojure-users:
- Jim Duey EasyMonads (advanced level)
In the past they've been posted on infoq.com several months later.
Scott
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Felix Filozov ffilo...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you know if videos will be available?
On Friday, September 30, 2011, faenvie fanny.aen...@gmx.de wrote:
hi clojure-users,
i ploughed
Nice article in the wiki link, the logic rings pretty true for me. Clojure
is a truly powerful language and I don't want for any higher-level
facilities with it yet. :)
That said, it would probably mean great strides in the industry if elegant
Clojure code could be translated to comprehensible
When I do M-x clojure-jack-in on one project.clj which uses clojure 1.2.1,
I'm able to evaluate (doc map).
But with another project.clj which uses clojure 1.3.0-RC0, the repl is
unable to resolve symbol: doc. I also changed it to use clojure 1.3.0, ran
lein deps... M-x clojure-jack-in
Thanks (both) for the advice!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from
In 1.3 doc was moved to the clojure.repl namespace. So, at the repl, you can:
(use 'clojure.repl)
and (doc foo) should work again.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Andrew ache...@gmail.com wrote:
When I do M-x clojure-jack-in on one project.clj which uses clojure 1.2.1,
I'm able to evaluate
Oh **that's** what was meant by the blurb below. Thanks.2.26 doc find-doc
moved to REPL
Adds special form docs to the REPL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Andrew ache...@gmail.com wrote:
When I do M-x clojure-jack-in on one project.clj which uses clojure 1.2.1,
I'm able to evaluate (doc map).
But with another project.clj which uses clojure 1.3.0-RC0, the repl is
unable to resolve symbol: doc. I also changed it
C-c C-d d, right?
On Sep 30, 1:38 pm, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Andrew ache...@gmail.com wrote:
When I do M-x clojure-jack-in on one project.clj which uses clojure 1.2.1,
I'm able to evaluate (doc map).
But with another project.clj which uses
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
C-c C-d d, right?
Oops, yes that's right.
-Phil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from
It was stated at the conference that InfoQ was videoing everything and
will post it over the next six months as they get time to edit/produce
each session.
Sean
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Scott Jaderholm jaderh...@gmail.com wrote:
In the past they've been posted on infoq.com several
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 13:48, Jim jcrossl...@gmail.com wrote:
The TorqueBox[1] team is toying with the idea of exposing to Clojure
the abstractions we currently expose to Ruby. We're looking for
feedback from you guys to see what you use now to solve these
problems, what you'd like to see in
Scripturian is a scalable alternative to JSR-223, providing a clear
threading model for embedding JVM languages into high-concurrency
applications:
http://threecrickets.com/scripturian/
Note that this also brings Clojure 1.3.0 support to Prudence. It already
exists on trunk, and you can build
Yes, we are working on getting them published. Rich Hickey's keynote
is in the first batch and has already been edited, just waiting to be
synced to slides and scheduled at InfoQ.
Stuart's slides were from a workshop (Aaaron Bedra also did one) and
those were 3 hrs and not filmed, so they will
So what's the plan for the future? Are there plans to make clojure
stable at some point so that backward compatibility can be expected?
Otherwise I am going to have difficulty continuing to advocate clojure
to my colleagues. In other words, when will the library ecosystem be
considered
29 matches
Mail list logo
