Great! Thank you so much for 1.3 support!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To
BTW, http://www.clojureql.org/ is down, do you know what happened?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
Hi Marek!
I would def a protocol CustomArithmetics and include the the nescessary
methods for arithmetics, and then a deftype for each custom arithmetics. It
would be possible to extend the protocol for Longs and Integers as well, if
needed.
If you would like to use the normal operator-names +,-
Marek Kubica ma...@xivilization.net writes:
I am idly thinging on how to create types with special restraints on
them, like being only in the range 1-1000 or only even numbers etc and
all normal operations like + and - still being valid.
+ and - would have wrap-around semantics, I guess?
If anyone were to consider, I would vote for ClojureQL 1.1 to factor
out the Relational Algebra engine into a subcomponent with independent
presence on Clojars.
Regards,
Shantanu
On Dec 20, 5:22 am, Herwig Hochleitner hhochleit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
we've finally got around to do a bug
Hi,
Wow, thanks for all that input :) It is always a pleasure to post on
this list, to get such good advice.
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:51:31 +0100
Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org wrote:
I am idly thinging on how to create types with special restraints on
them, like being only in the range
Hello Dave !
2011/12/21 Dave Ray dave...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I've just release Seesaw 1.3.0. Details of this release can be found
in the release notes [1]. There are a few features I'm pretty happy
about, so I'll mention them briefly here.
Interactive development: So far, learning Seesaw has
On 21 Dec 2011, at 12:42, Laurent PETIT wrote:
As a tool builder, I'd also be interested if what is printed in *out*
by these functions could also be made available as pure data, so that
e.g. at some point in time, CCW could provide a specialized tabular
view to display (edit?) this
Hi,
Am 21.12.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Sam Aaron:
One approach to achieving that is to create a special type which represents
the data and for which you also override the print-method.
A simple approach is a get-option-info and a print-option-info. Toolsmiths use
get-option-info to get the data
On 21 Dec 2011, at 13:10, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
Hi,
Am 21.12.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Sam Aaron:
One approach to achieving that is to create a special type which represents
the data and for which you also override the print-method.
A simple approach is a get-option-info and a
2011/12/21 Marek Kubica ma...@xivilization.net
Hi,
Thanks for your mail, glad to get ideas so fast :)
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:51:04 +0100
Linus Ericsson oscarlinuserics...@gmail.com wrote:
I would def a protocol CustomArithmetics and include the the
nescessary methods for arithmetics,
Thanks Sam! Of course my experience with Overtone had more than a
little to do with this work :)
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Sam Aaron samaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dave,
very cool - I love that you're working on improving the explorability of the
system. It's clearly a focus that REPL
Kevin,
Being a Swing app, I'd take a look at how Clooj
(https://github.com/arthuredelstein/clooj) does it.
Dave
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Kevin Ilchmann Jørgensen
kijm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Regarding explorability, what would be the best way to provide an repl
directly in a Seesaw
Hi Laurent!
...
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Dave !
2011/12/21 Dave Ray dave...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I've just release Seesaw 1.3.0. Details of this release can be found
in the release notes [1]. There are a few features I'm pretty happy
Marek Kubica ma...@xivilization.net writes:
Hi Marek,
Yeah, the problem that I see is that I have an additional set of
operators, r+, r- and friends, so every consumer has to be aware of my
numbers and use the proper operations, like the float-operators in
OCaml +. -. or the BigInteger stuff
Vinzent: I figure Lau is updating the Site.
2011/12/21 Shantanu Kumar kumar.shant...@gmail.com
If anyone were to consider, I would vote for ClojureQL 1.1 to factor
out the Relational Algebra engine into a subcomponent with independent
presence on Clojars.
Factoring CQL is indeed desirable.
Despite Brian Carpenter's warning about torches and pitchforks [1],
I've decided to release a reader-macros package; may Zeus forgive me
for opening this pithos:
https://github.com/klutometis/reader-macros
Here's a trivial example where we implement a reverse-string reader:
(use
Good to hear it.
One more thing: Shantanu Kumar have proposed to create a clojureql google
group, and I also think it's a good idea. Would you please create it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Peter Danenberg p...@roxygen.org wrote:
Despite Brian Carpenter's warning about torches and pitchforks [1],
I've decided to release a reader-macros package; may Zeus forgive me
for opening this pithos:
https://github.com/klutometis/reader-macros
Here's a
Quoth Aaron Cohen on Setting Orange, the 63rd of The Aftermath:
Ha, I just looked at the source, it's really weird to see λ in
clojure code.
That's a little idiosyncrasy of mine: I've been chastised for it in
the past; maybe `lambda' would be more readable?
--
You received this message
2011/12/21 Peter Danenberg p...@roxygen.org:
Quoth Aaron Cohen on Setting Orange, the 63rd of The Aftermath:
Ha, I just looked at the source, it's really weird to see λ in
clojure code.
That's a little idiosyncrasy of mine: I've been chastised for it in
the past; maybe `lambda' would be more
2011/12/21 Aaron Cohen aa...@assonance.org:
2011/12/21 Peter Danenberg p...@roxygen.org:
Quoth Aaron Cohen on Setting Orange, the 63rd of The Aftermath:
Ha, I just looked at the source, it's really weird to see λ in
clojure code.
That's a little idiosyncrasy of mine: I've been chastised for
Quoth Aaron Cohen on Setting Orange, the 63rd of The Aftermath:
One thing I'd really want before I even considered using this would
be some way of restricting the scope of a reader macro to the
current file. As is, they just have way too much room to interfere
with your whole world. I'm not
Quoth Aaron Cohen on Setting Orange, the 63rd of The Aftermath:
Oh excuse me, I was misreading what is going on here with the
lambda. I thought it was a reader macro, but you're just pulling
that alias in from some dependency.
Exactly: `λ' and `defλ' are just vanilla macros that shadow `fn'
Is this correct? Are there other ways to convert this java line in clojure?
Java:
boxWidget.GetProp3D().SetUserTransform(t);
Clojure:
(doto boxWidget (- (GetProp3D.) (.SetUserTransform t)))
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to
You can also do (.. boxWidget GetProp3D (SetUserTransform t)) or (-
boxWidget .GetProp3D (.SetUserTransform t))
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new
On Dec 21, 12:03 pm, Jonas jonas.enl...@gmail.com wrote:
You can also do (.. boxWidget GetProp3D (SetUserTransform t)) or (-
boxWidget .GetProp3D (.SetUserTransform t))
Well, neither of these are strictly equivalent to his original code,
which returns the boxWidget; yours return the result of
I am trying to listen every interaction event that is generated by the
boxWidget, but I am not able to get the solution
(defn myCallback []
(let [t (vtk.vtkTransform.)]
(doto boxWidget
(.GetTransform t)
(- (.GetProp3D) (.SetUserTransform t))
)))
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
On Dec 21, 12:03 pm, Jonas jonas.enl...@gmail.com wrote:
You can also do (.. boxWidget GetProp3D (SetUserTransform t)) or (-
boxWidget .GetProp3D (.SetUserTransform t))
Well, neither of these are strictly equivalent to his
Hi,
Am 21.12.2011 um 23:39 schrieb Dave Ray:
yeah. it's only 3 characters, but for whatever reason it sees to make
a difference to me :)
Also to consider: using the dot-in-front version with - might enable your dev
env to provide much better hints for code completion(*), which might reduce
I am trying to write an application using *command-line-args* to read and
write images:
(defn read-write-image [input-filename output-filename]
(let [reader (ImageFileReader.)
writer (ImageFileWriter.)]
(.SetFileName reader input-filename)
(.SetFileName writer output-filename)
Solved:
(read-write-image (nth *command-line-args* 0) (nth *command-line-args* 1))
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
32 matches
Mail list logo
