Hi,
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 7:37:09 AM UTC+2, bsmith.occs wrote:
Consider a simpler example with a vector, which doesn't produce an
error since it's allowed to have duplicates:
(def k (atom 0))
(defn generate-id [] (swap! k inc))
Now when the reader reads this:
From what I've heard, you are absolutely right on those globals. It isn't
considered idiomatic and should be avoided, like in all other languages.
The singleton analogy fits pretty good.
Some advice on how to encapsulate state in a sane way can be found for
example here:
Hello there!
We are still looking for someone who is in or around Zürich in the next
couple of months and who'd be willing to give us a nice Clojure intro
(ideally with lots of examples). Please see
http://zhgeeks.org/
for details about us. Thanks!!
Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
--
A good use case - You want to place html files, that can be processed in
your server side code. Inorder for your code to have access to it, you will
have to place them in the src dir. However if you use the :resource-path,
you can define a dir relative to the root of your project where you are
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Kevin Downey redc...@gmail.com wrote:
I've used it to make ClojureScript functions in to javascript object
constructors
(defn Foo [] (js* /*) (js* */))
results in the generated return being commented out, so (Foo.) works
I use this in a macro for creating
Hello,
right now, this works in clojurescript:
;; in a file lib/fancy.cljs
(ns lib.fancy)
(defn fun [x]
[:runtime :fun x])
;; in a file lib/fancy.clj
(ns lib.fancy)
(defmacro fun [x]
[:precompiled :fun x])
;; in a file app/core.clj
(ns app.core
(:require
[lib.fancy :as fancy])
*typo correction*: the third block should be in a file app/core.*cljs*
*
*
thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Herwig Hochleitner
hhochleit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
right now, this works in clojurescript:
;; in a file lib/fancy.cljs
(ns lib.fancy)
(defn fun [x]
[:runtime :fun x])
;; in a file lib/fancy.clj
(ns lib.fancy)
(defmacro fun [x]
[:precompiled
2012/9/13 David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com
That's how compiler macros are intended to work.
Great! So am I right with the notion, that clojure's defmacros are not
compiler macros and one would use the :inline meta key in clojure to
achieve the same effect?
Supposing that I am, that means
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Herwig Hochleitner
hhochleit...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/9/13 David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com
That's how compiler macros are intended to work.
Great! So am I right with the notion, that clojure's defmacros are not
compiler macros and one would use the
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Brandon Bloom snprbo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm exploring some changes to the ClojureScript compiler backend and am
curious if anyone is using one particular implementation detail: The js*
special form.
Note that I'm not asking about the js/ pseudo-namespace,
Thanks for your clarification!
A few further thoughts:
ClojureScript may one day be self-hosting but it's not a near term
goal given the desire to target the kinds of clients that run
JavaScript.
Considering that the path to a self hosting clojure would probably start at
clojurescript and
david, what's the recommended way to convert between cljs and native js
objects for interop with existing js code?
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:13:59 AM UTC-4, David Nolen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Brandon Bloom
snpr...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I'm exploring some
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Dustin Getz dustin.g...@gmail.com wrote:
david, what's the recommended way to convert between cljs and native js
objects for interop with existing js code?
There is no good conversion from CLJS data structures to JS data
structures, at least not enough good
If I'm right then defining your 'globals' (for lack of a
better word) like this would mean, among other things, that you really can't
have two independent Noir apps defined/running in the same project - is that
a correct assessment?
Just out of curiosity, could you expand on what you mean
On Sep 13, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Mark Rathwell wrote:
If I'm right then defining your 'globals' (for lack of a
better word) like this would mean, among other things, that you really can't
have two independent Noir apps defined/running in the same project - is that
a correct assessment?
Just
Just a reminder that people should not be using it at all. It may be
removed at anytime without warning.
I'm considering replacing it with a form which must return JS AST nodes,
instead of a JS source code string.
If people are encountering reasons
to use it - something is missing
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Brandon Bloom snprbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a reminder that people should not be using it at all. It may be
removed at anytime without warning.
I'm considering replacing it with a form which must return JS AST nodes,
instead of a JS source code string.
Why
I have a potential customer in Zürich, so I might be around within the next
months.
Who should I contact if I get specific dates, and what kind of intro are
you looking for?
- Karl
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 11:24:42 AM UTC+2, al-maisan wrote:
Hello there!
We are still looking for
Why should the backend have to deal with JS AST nodes?
I'm considering changing the emit phase to produce a Google Closure
Compiler AST. This would have several benefits:
1. The emit phase would become functional (returning an AST) instead
of procedural (printing source).
2. Test
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Brandon Bloom snprbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Why should the backend have to deal with JS AST nodes?
I'm considering changing the emit phase to produce a Google Closure Compiler
AST. This would have several benefits:
The emit phase would become functional
Welle is an expressive Clojure client for Riak with batteries included.
New in 1.3:
* Riak Search support (currently only via the Solr API)
* More efficient JSON serialization
* Content-type based serialization now supports SMILE (binary JSON)
* Minor convenience functions
* Documentation
One of the great advantages of Ring (and other purely functional bits that
stack on top, like Compojure, Bishop, etc) is that its handlers are readily
composable. Among other things, this means that way you compose handlers
from two different namespaces in the same app is fundamentally no
On 09/13/2012 07:26 PM, Krukow wrote:
I have a potential customer in Zürich, so I might be around within the next
months.
Who should I contact if I get specific dates, and what kind of intro
are you looking for?
Hello Karl,
just drop me an email (ideally 2 weeks in advance so we can
On 13/09/2012, at 20.54, Muharem Hrnjadovic wrote:
Hello Karl,
just drop me an email (ideally 2 weeks in advance so we can announce
and promote the event). Since this would be the first meetup about
Clojure I thought we would target beginners to intermediate users.
Sure, will do. I don't
On 09/13/2012 08:57 PM, Karl Krukow wrote:
On 13/09/2012, at 20.54, Muharem Hrnjadovic wrote:
Hello Karl,
just drop me an email (ideally 2 weeks in advance so we can announce
and promote the event). Since this would be the first meetup about
Clojure I thought we would target beginners to
I use it for fast string concatenation
https://www.refheap.com/paste/5060
JW
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:12:21 AM UTC+2, Brandon Bloom wrote:
I'm exploring some changes to the ClojureScript compiler backend and am
curious if anyone is using one particular implementation detail: The
Justin Balthrop jus...@justinbalthrop.com writes:
Hi Justin,
Once you've installed drip, setting up Leiningen to use it just
requires adding the following to ~/.lein/leinrc:
LEIN_JAVA_CMD=${LEIN_JAVA_CMD-drip}
I did just that, but I don't get any speedup with leiningen. All I can
see is
Thanks.
I investigated it, which led to another related question as to whether lazy
seqs are always chunked (it appears not!). I posted this on stack overflow
here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12412038/in-clojure-are-lazy-seqs-always-chunked
--
You received this message because you
I want to offer a big thanks to Chas Emerick, Brian Carper and Christophe
Grand. I just got their book Clojure Programming from Amazon yesterday.
Spent the whole night reading it. This is my favorite Clojure book so far.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On 13/09/12 21:40, larry google groups wrote:
I want to offer a big thanks to Chas Emerick, Brian Carper and
Christophe Grand. I just got their book Clojure Programming from
Amazon yesterday. Spent the whole night reading it. This is my
favorite Clojure book so far
It is certainly the most
Hi,
Over on the Seesaw list, there's a little question about a possible
breaking change to the way selection works:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/seesaw-clj/qJe7RElZmYw
Thought I'd mention it here in case anyone wants to object.
Cheers,
Dave
--
You received this
I did just that, but I don't get any speedup with leiningen. All I can
see is that after every leiningen command, drip ps shows one process
more. For example:
This is also happening for me. Is there some way to configure drip to
ignore certain arguments?
jack.
--
You received this message
I did just that, but I don't get any speedup with leiningen. All I can
see is that after every leiningen command, drip ps shows one process
more. For example:
This is also happening for me. Is there some way to configure drip to
ignore certain arguments?
I added a way to specify options
34 matches
Mail list logo
