to
convert
[:a :b :c :d :a :b :c :d :a :b :c]
into
((:a) (:b :c) (:a :d) (:b :c) (:a))
using the sub-seq (:b :c) instead of positions.
partition, partition-by and the like all look at one element at a time.
What I need is a search based on seqs. Are there functions that support
to
convert
[:a :b :c :d :a :b :c :d :a :b :c]
into
((:a) (:b :c) (:a :d) (:b :c) (:a))
using the sub-seq (:b :c) instead of positions.
partition, partition-by and the like all look at one element at a time.
What I need is a search based on seqs. Are there functions that support
is the preferred way to find sub-seqs in a seq? I am trying to
convert
[:a :b :c :d :a :b :c :d :a :b :c]
into
((:a) (:b :c) (:a :d) (:b :c) (:a))
using the sub-seq (:b :c) instead of positions.
partition, partition-by and the like all look at one element at a time.
What I need is a search based
trying to
convert
[:a :b :c :d :a :b :c :d :a :b :c]
into
((:a) (:b :c) (:a :d) (:b :c) (:a))
using the sub-seq (:b :c) instead of positions.
partition, partition-by and the like all look at one element at a time.
What I need is a search based on seqs. Are there functions that support
:c) (:a))
using the sub-seq (:b :c) instead of positions.
partition, partition-by and the like all look at one element at a time.
What I need is a search based on seqs. Are there functions that support
such a search / split?
Uli
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
is a search based on seqs. Are there functions that support
such a search / split?
Uli
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please
trying to convert
[:a :b :c :d :a :b :c :d :a :b :c]
into
((:a) (:b :c) (:a :d) (:b :c) (:a))
using the sub-seq (:b :c) instead of positions.
partition, partition-by and the like all look at one element at a time.
What I need is a search based on seqs. Are there functions that support
