Monger [1] is a modern Clojure MongoDB client.
3.0 has breaking API changes. Release notes:
http://blog.clojurewerkz.org/blog/2015/07/16/monger-3-dot-0-0-is-released/
1. http://clojuremongodb.info
--
MK
http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
--
You received this
Hi!
I have some, maybe controversial, questions...
A little bit of context: https://twitter.com/aphyr/status/621806683908542464
Why this is like a normal approach for managing third party contributions
to clojure core? This kind of things the only discourages the
contributions. Maybe I don't
My understanding was that if I pass an eduction to a process using reduce,
I can save the computer time and space because the per step overhead of
lazy sequences is gone and also the entire sequence does not have to reside
in memory at once.
When I time the difference between (apply max (map
I have tried various different approaches from convincing of Clojure
advantages in the Java devs concrete domain, showing off incredibly awesome
toy projects, larger projects, not tryng to sell, trying to sell, sending
ClojureTV videos and what not approach you can think of. I have not managed
I have tried various different approaches from convincing of Clojure
advantages in the Java devs concrete domain, showing off incredibly awesome
toy projects, larger projects, not tryng to sell, trying to sell, sending
ClojureTV videos and what not approach you can think of. I have not managed
Clojure 1.8.0-alpha1 and 1.8.0-alpha2 are now available.
Try it via
- Download: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.8.0-alpha2
- Leiningen: [org.clojure/clojure 1.8.0-alpha2]
1.8.0-alpha1 includes support for tuples (optimized small vectors) inspired
by Zach Tellman's work.
On 18 July 2015 at 14:13, Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.nz wrote:
Hi!
I have some, maybe controversial, questions...
A little bit of context:
https://twitter.com/aphyr/status/621806683908542464
Why this is like a normal approach for managing third party contributions
to clojure core? This kind
Btw, here's a bit more colour on the inclusion of tuples, Zack's own
thoughts on the subject
https://gist.github.com/ztellman/9ded0b77281f48942b68
On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 2:14:02 PM UTC+3, Andrey Antukh wrote:
Hi!
I have some, maybe controversial, questions...
A little bit of
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (although I maybe wouldn’t be so mocking in my tone ;-). Since when did
software design by committee work; anyone remember J2EE? (and yes, that
does deserve my mocking tone).
I have no idea about the details being
On 18 July 2015 at 18:48, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (although I maybe wouldn’t be so mocking in my tone ;-). Since when did
software design by committee work; anyone remember J2EE? (and yes, that
does deserve my mocking tone).
Why do people always say that a committee is
On 18 July 2015 at 20:18, Luc Prefontaine lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca
wrote:
Aaah ! The pull request looms again :)
A bug tracking system is essentialy to coordinate efforts, pull request
are not a mechanism to track fixes/improvements and discuss about
them. That may work for a very small
Each linux kernel release involves hundreds of people.
Many release had above a thousand contributors.
This is for your enlightenment and are old figures:
http://royal.pingdom.com/2012/04/16/linux-kernel-development-numbers/
There are as many people not officially hired to work for linux
On 18 July 2015 at 22:52, Luc Préfontaine lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca
wrote:
Each linux kernel release involves hundreds of people.
Many release had above a thousand contributors.
This is for your enlightenment and are old figures:
David,
Have your opinion on Akka changed since 2013 now that you have seen its
progress ? I am very interested in your opinion.
Regards,
Mateusz
W dniu czwartek, 4 lipca 2013 11:39:46 UTC+2 użytkownik David Pollak
napisał:
Please keep in mind that Scala's Actor Model is a very thin piece
Andrey:
Pull requests have come up many times before, but since it has been quite
some time since the last time, perhaps most people have not seen Rich's
answer the last time he responded to it. Below is a direct link, if you
want to read it. The short answer is that he prefers the work flow of
You mentionned RedHat Linux centric type corporations. There are a lot more
businesses that are not Linux
centric business wise. They use it but provide something else on top.
Did you even read this article against your own statement ? :)
A huge number of occasional contributors were not
I don't think the tweets you link are the 'normal approach'. I would call
them pretty unusual in several aspects. For one, I think that for the vast
majority of Clojure tickets created, no on asks and gets Rich's comments on
them before they are created. Second, most end up being committed as
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Bozhidar Batsov bozhi...@batsov.com
wrote:
On 18 July 2015 at 14:13, Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.nz wrote:
Hi!
I have some, maybe controversial, questions...
A little bit of context:
https://twitter.com/aphyr/status/621806683908542464
Why this is like a
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Luc Prefontaine
lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca wrote:
Aaah ! The pull request looms again :)
A bug tracking system is essentialy to coordinate efforts, pull request
are not a mechanism to track fixes/improvements and discuss about
them. That may work for a very
Excuse-me if I hurt your personal feelings but most of the proponents of pull
requests
so far have been in fact extremely allergic to report problems/improvements
in Jira first before submitting a code change.
I was addressing this audience because this subject comes back over and over
again.
Aaah ! The pull request looms again :)
A bug tracking system is essentialy to coordinate efforts, pull request are not
a mechanism to track fixes/improvements and discuss about
them. That may work for a very small team. The # of clojure contributors far
excess that size.
Pull requests/gitbhub
Everyone: let's keep the tone civil.
Andrey: thanks for your workflow suggestions. I politely re-decline all of
them, having considered all your points multiple times over several years and
having chosen approaches that I believe are better matched with my objectives.
The objective of
+1 (although I maybe wouldn’t be so mocking in my tone ;-). Since when did
software design by committee work; anyone remember J2EE? (and yes, that does
deserve my mocking tone).
I have no idea about the details being discussed here/why people’s noses are
out of joint, but I can think of as
Sure, indentation is what gets the code running on metal :))
Not ranting here, just my abs dying from the pain as I laugh :))
As for the contrib process, go have a look at Linux. You'll be happy that Rich
is cool by every meaning of the word.
There's this misconception about open source that
Re jira: we have started the process to upgrade some of the current
infrastructure. This will take a while (likely months) as it involves
contracts, purchases, and upgrades (where jira does not have a stellar
reputation). Even jira from N years ago is significantly more capable than
the github
I'm speaking very much as a passenger in this community, and I've had the
privilege of meeting just a few of you people, but that may be no handicap.
It's a worthwhile debate to have, but this is very much an edge case. Rich has
kindly and wisely reduced his own bum-print in the ecosystem so
On 18 July 2015 at 18:44, Luc Prefontaine lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca
wrote:
Sure, indentation is what gets the code running on metal :))
That remark is wrong on so many levels...
In the words of the legendary SICP authors - Programs must be written for
people to read, and only incidentally
Hello
I am a master's student and would like to contribute to the clojure/android
platform. I found this project
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Project+Ideas#ProjectIdeas-BetterClojureAndroidintegration
on the project ideas site for GSoC 2015. I was hoping to submit the project
Wow, that's a fast timeline. Thank you. We'll upgrade to Alpha 2 this week.
We may go to production with it fairly quickly.
Sean
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Alex Miller a...@puredanger.com wrote:
Clojure 1.8.0-alpha1 and 1.8.0-alpha2 are now available.
Try it via
- Download:
Linux and Linus? Github vs Jira?
Enough of these distractions.
The issue here is that brilliant people like Zach Tellman is strongly
disinclined to make contributions to the core Clojure implementation in the
future. That Kyle Kingsbury, another brilliant developer, feels
stonewalled - and
On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 9:16:39 PM UTC-4, Linus Ericsson wrote:
Dear Mr/Ms/Mme/PhD Dynamics,
I have this epic joke I would like yo send you, please fill in your fax
number in the boxes below (please write clearly and use a pen with black
ink, make sure the two carbon papers are
It is sad that Zach and Kyle thinks they spent time in vain.
Clojure is less about code and more about holistic considerations and
intentions than most other software projects. Jira (and mail chains such as
this) are probably the worst possible hammers on communicating intentions
and more
Great :) thanks :)
On Friday, July 17, 2015 at 2:14:50 AM UTC+2, Jonathan Winandy wrote:
Hello !
I think, this branch (without : empty?))
(match [l prefix]
*[_ ([] :seq)] true*
is already checking that prefix is empty.
Have a nice day,
Jon
On 16 July 2015 at 23:06, Rastko
On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 8:22:35 PM UTC-4, Linus Ericsson wrote:
In cases like these I would strongly suggest Zach, Kyle and the Clojure
Core-team to strive to communicate by phone
My God. First contributor agreements that have to be submitted by Pony
Express, and now *phone calls*?
Dear Mr/Ms/Mme/PhD Dynamics,
I have this epic joke I would like yo send you, please fill in your fax
number in the boxes below (please write clearly and use a pen with black
ink, make sure the two carbon papers are correctly aligned).
[_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_]
Thanks,
Linus
Sent from my Ericsson
35 matches
Mail list logo
