Re: [ClojureScript] Re: Upgrading Om, js/React.createFactory not present?

2015-10-12 Thread Ken Restivo
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:42:52PM -0700, Adam Kowalski wrote: > Om next relies on factories so I know that it should be available in the > latest build 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT. Its not on clojars but you can clone the latest > version of the om repo and run lein install. You will get a jar inside of the

[ClojureScript] Re: Figwheel/cider clojurescript environment

2015-10-12 Thread Adam Kowalski
Colin that sounds fantastic, can you elaborate more on your plans? So if you will bypass the nREPL are you going to somehow connect directly to the figwheel REPL? I have setup a basic cursive environment with intellij and already as it is today it seems pretty sophisticated. I really like the

[ClojureScript] Re: Figwheel/cider clojurescript environment

2015-10-12 Thread Tord Romstad
On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 9:29:18 AM UTC+2, Adam Kowalski wrote: > Colin that sounds fantastic, can you elaborate more on your plans? So if you > will bypass the nREPL are you going to somehow connect directly to the > figwheel REPL? > > I have setup a basic cursive environment with

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: Figwheel/cider clojurescript environment

2015-10-12 Thread Colin Fleming
Yes, if I set up a custom REPL type in Cursive I can connect directly to the Figwheel REPL and to similar configs like a standard clojure.main REPL. Once I have a direct connection many more things are possible, such as a test integration like Cursive currently offers for Clojure and also

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: Figwheel/cider clojurescript environment

2015-10-12 Thread Colin Fleming
Sure, it's definitely possible, and once you have a working config it's very solid. However I think that a dedicated REPL type will be more robust, particularly when it comes time to upgrade Figwheel or some other part of the chain. The initial setup is clearly difficult and fragile right now, as