In my app, I am using :yes and :no sometimes instead of true and false.
I’d like to know what is the best way to extends the `not` function to be able
to handle :yes and :no properly.
I was expecting some kind of Boolean protocol but I wasn’t able to find it.
I could write this:
(defn not
Hi Sam,
No, it will be Saturday before I get time to start. But, yeah, I'd be happy
to collaborate!
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 02:51 whodidthis ton...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 3:04:42 AM UTC+2, sam wrote:
On Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 9:36:19 AM UTC-5, Daniel Kersten
Hello Clojure fans!
We will be returning to Portland (same theater as 2013) for Clojure/West
this year on April 20-22nd and workshops on the weekend prior. We currently
plan to have tickets on sale Monday - see http://twitter.com/clojurewest
and http://clojurewest.org for more info and last
On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 3:50:21 PM UTC-5, Yehonathan Sharvit wrote:
In my app, I am using :yes and :no sometimes instead of true and false.
I’d like to know what is the best way to extends the `not` function to be
able to handle :yes and :no properly.
I was expecting
I have separated the code for reactive atoms, cursors and expressions from
freactive (https://github.com/aaronc/freactive) into a separate
freactive.core library: https://github.com/aaronc/freactive.core.
The code for these data structures has evolved significantly since I
released freactive,
Also, see:
https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Compiler-Options#static-fns
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
ClojureScript group.
To unsubscribe
slightly off topic
I saw this code fragment (which calculates Pascal's triangle), which to my eyes
is very elegant, self-descriptive and demonstrates the power of functional
programming:
(def pascal
(iterate #(concat [1]
(map + % (rest %))
[1])
I'm getting the same thing. Did you guys resolve this?
Kristofer Svärd mailto:kristofer.sv...@gmail.com
January 2, 2015 at 10:55 AM
Do I still need to specify an externs file when compiling with
advanced optimization? I found that from Om 0.8.0-beta4 specifying both
:optimizations :advanced
There's nothing to resolve. The README includes updated usage instructions
which you may have missed.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Sam Ritchie sritchi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting the same thing. Did you guys resolve this?
Kristofer Svärd kristofer.sv...@gmail.com
January 2, 2015
