It's not supported. ClojureScript's ns form is a restrictive subset of the
functionality provided in Clojure. This is a good thing, what's there
already involves an amazing amount of complexity.
David
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Tom Locke t...@tomlocke.com wrote:
Are prefix lists
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 16:49:55 UTC, Viktor Eriksson wrote:
On Friday, December 19, 2014 at 12:31:16 PM UTC+1, Andrew Keedle wrote:
Simple post and sample project about getting started with cljs.test (using
phantomjs).
Hi Aiden
Are you using Hickory?
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 20, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Aiden Nibali dismaldeni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I've put together an online HTML to Hiccup converter at
http://tohiccup.herokuapp.com/
Hopefully this will be of some use to people either as another
Hello all,
I've put together an online HTML to Hiccup converter at
http://tohiccup.herokuapp.com/
Hopefully this will be of some use to people either as another example of an Om
project or for the tool itself.
Aiden
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
Hey Marc,
I am indeed using Hickory, though I've added some pretty-printing code which
manipulates the output a bit. For example:
div id=my-container class=blue centeredHello/div
produces
[:div#my-container.blue.centered
Hello]
rather than something like
[:div {:id my-container :class blue
Fair enough.
Are there any tips for reducing the size of large ns forms?
For example I have a util namespace, and I consider the functions in there part
of my core vocabulary, alongside all the regular core functions and macros. I
don’t want to see them with a namespace prefix in my code.
There is no way around this.
David
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Tom Locke t...@tomlocke.com wrote:
Fair enough.
Are there any tips for reducing the size of large ns forms?
For example I have a util namespace, and I consider the functions in there
part of my core vocabulary, alongside
Would you reject a patch which adds (only) prefix lists to the ns form, or is
this a feature you never want to see in ClojureScript?
(Not that I'm going to rush out and write one: just want to know your stance
here.)
On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 10:51:36 AM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote:
There
Further enhancements to the ns form are the very lowest priority. People
can submit patches but they are unlikely to get any attention anytime soon.
David
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Francis Avila fav...@breezeehr.com wrote:
Would you reject a patch which adds (only) prefix lists to the
