On Friday, February 20, 2015, Colin Fleming wrote:
As someone who has to parse and manipulate ns forms,
prefix lists are one of the most annoying things to
have to deal with.
As the maintainer of tools.namespace, I agree completely. :)
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated -
It's not supported. ClojureScript's ns form is a restrictive subset of the
functionality provided in Clojure. This is a good thing, what's there
already involves an amazing amount of complexity.
David
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Tom Locke t...@tomlocke.com wrote:
Are prefix lists
Fair enough.
Are there any tips for reducing the size of large ns forms?
For example I have a util namespace, and I consider the functions in there part
of my core vocabulary, alongside all the regular core functions and macros. I
don’t want to see them with a namespace prefix in my code.
There is no way around this.
David
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Tom Locke t...@tomlocke.com wrote:
Fair enough.
Are there any tips for reducing the size of large ns forms?
For example I have a util namespace, and I consider the functions in there
part of my core vocabulary, alongside
Would you reject a patch which adds (only) prefix lists to the ns form, or is
this a feature you never want to see in ClojureScript?
(Not that I'm going to rush out and write one: just want to know your stance
here.)
On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 10:51:36 AM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote:
There
Further enhancements to the ns form are the very lowest priority. People
can submit patches but they are unlikely to get any attention anytime soon.
David
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Francis Avila fav...@breezeehr.com wrote:
Would you reject a patch which adds (only) prefix lists to the
