> I am also willing to volunteer for this. As the base image is moving to
> server wg, and my work related to rel-eng testing side is stable, I can
> refocus myself to the Fedora Atomic host in the same way I was doing
> base image. Last few months were about jumping into too many things. I
> hope
On 25/08/16, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 08/25/2016 02:51 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >>
> >> Others have made some good comments in this thread. I'm really not as
> >> concerned with these specific questions.
> >>
> >> I think the deeper prob
On 08/25/2016 02:51 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>> Others have made some good comments in this thread. I'm really not as
>> concerned with these specific questions.
>>
>> I think the deeper problem is that there needs to be (I think) a person
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 08/24/2016 11:27 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> During Flock PRD discussion, a proposal was put up about changing the
>> name of the WG to Atomic. We have few open questions from last week's
>> meeting. I
>> will try to put thos
On 08/24/2016 11:27 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> During Flock PRD discussion, a proposal was put up about changing the
> name of the WG to Atomic. We have few open questions from last week's
> meeting. I
> will try to put those down here, if anyone wants to add to that list, or
> explain
On 08/24/2016 08:07 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> One thing that has certainly been on my
> mind is whether "Project Atomic" should dissolve more directly
> into the distributions, a bit like how the "Modularity" effort is more
> directly part of Fedora. I'm not sure though, because we still need
> t
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:07:08PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> One thing that has certainly been on my
> mind is whether "Project Atomic" should dissolve more directly
> into the distributions, a bit like how the "Modularity" effort is more
> directly part of Fedora. I'm not sure though, because
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016, at 06:06 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:57:52PM +0530, Kushal Das wrote:
> > * If we rename how to make sure that the users know that we are not
> > abandoning the cloud?
>
> I've got a three-part answer to this part.
>
> First, this absolutely *is*
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:57:52PM +0530, Kushal Das wrote:
> * If we rename how to make sure that the users know that we are not
> abandoning the cloud?
I've got a three-part answer to this part.
First, this absolutely *is* a refocus on container tech for scale-out
computing. That pretty much
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:20:10PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > During Flock PRD discussion, a proposal was put up about changing the
> > name of the WG to Atomic.
> I think the name Atomic is already over used. People have no idea on
> what is atomic, and adding one more things named atomic
Le mercredi 24 août 2016 à 20:57 +0530, Kushal Das a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> During Flock PRD discussion, a proposal was put up about changing the
> name of the WG to Atomic.
I think the name Atomic is already over used. People have no idea on
what is atomic, and adding one more things named atom
11 matches
Mail list logo
