On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:05:24PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As Dennis said, there are Atomic images produced nightly as part of the
> *regular* Branched composes. So you don't see any Fedora-Atomic-25-
> (foo) fedmsgs because there are no Fedora-Atomic-25 composes. There are
> just
On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 09:39 +0530, Sayan Chowdhury wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 1, 2016 8:41:45 AM CDT Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > I see Fedora Rawhide, just Fedora (cloud base, I assume) 25, and Fedora
> > > Atomic 24 in
On 03/10/16, Kushal Das wrote:
> On 01/10/16, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > I see Fedora Rawhide, just Fedora (cloud base, I assume) 25, and Fedora
> > Atomic 24 in https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/compose?limit=20.
> > Shouldn't there also be an Atomic 25 branch by now? (Shouldn't there be
>
On 01/10/16, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I see Fedora Rawhide, just Fedora (cloud base, I assume) 25, and Fedora
> Atomic 24 in https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/compose?limit=20.
> Shouldn't there also be an Atomic 25 branch by now? (Shouldn't there be
> one starting with branching, for that
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Saturday, October 1, 2016 8:41:45 AM CDT Matthew Miller wrote:
>> I see Fedora Rawhide, just Fedora (cloud base, I assume) 25, and Fedora
>> Atomic 24 in https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/compose?limit=20.
>>
On Saturday, October 1, 2016 8:41:45 AM CDT Matthew Miller wrote:
> I see Fedora Rawhide, just Fedora (cloud base, I assume) 25, and Fedora
> Atomic 24 in https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/compose?limit=20.
> Shouldn't there also be an Atomic 25 branch by now? (Shouldn't there be
> one
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016, at 02:59 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We can not ssh into the latest Fedora 25 based atomic images. While
> booting one image in Openstack I got [1] as console output.
There were a few causes of this, but to level set, let's be sure that