Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-29 Thread Adam Miller
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 17:03 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 04:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> > >> > I will note that I filed >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331864 - an unavoidable >> > crash

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-28 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 05:03:21PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > In this case, it's a combination of routing issue and bandwidth; the routing > issue here is that the people who watch the `anaconda` bugzilla entries don't > currently intersect much with Atomic Host. In general, please add me to >

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 17:03 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 04:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > I will note that I filed > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331864 - an unavoidable > > crash when installing from the Atomic installer image - in *April*, a

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-26 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 26 August 2016 at 16:45, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 14:27 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:43:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> > >> > There are a lot of images being produced and I have no idea if they're >> > really needed. That a release blockin

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-26 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 04:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I will note that I filed > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331864 - an unavoidable > crash when installing from the Atomic installer image - in *April*, and > no-one appears to care that the Atomic installer image has been br

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 14:27 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:43:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > There are a lot of images being produced and I have no idea if they're > > really needed. That a release blocking image (cloud base qcow2) nearly > > caused F25 alpha to

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-26 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:43:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > There are a lot of images being produced and I have no idea if they're > really needed. That a release blocking image (cloud base qcow2) nearly > caused F25 alpha to slip because it was busted at least suggests it > probably shouldn't

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-25 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 25 August 2016 at 13:34, Matthew Miller wrote: >> >> We've talked about this for a while, but let's make it formal. The plan >> is to transition from Cloud as a Fedora Edition to Something Container >> Clustery (see https://fedorap