[atomic-wg] Issue #178 `Fix locale support in base image.`

jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` C.UTF-8 is not the same locale at en_UTF8. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/178 ___ cloud mailing list --

Re: Separate Repository for Atomic Specific Fedora-Dockerfiles

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > The Plan of Record is to move away from that repository and to a > dist-git style collection of repositories as part of > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service > (possibly synced

Re: Move F25 Atomic to "Production" composes

On 11/16/2016 11:49 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 11/14/2016 04:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> Hi releng, >> >> It is a week before Fedora 25 will be released and the Atomic images >> are still using the "nightly" composes. When can we expect the >> production composes that run daily (i.e.

[atomic-wg] Issue #158 `Proposed website changes for Cloud Base → Atomic Host switch`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` mattdm and I are meeting with robyduck today to try to get a formal request in for cloud.fp.o `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/158

[atomic-wg] Issue #178 `Fix locale support in base image.`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @jberkus ^^ `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/178 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` as an alternative for now I have been working on getting the openshift-ansible installer to work against F25 atomic host. I have opened up several issuses: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/issues/2808

Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-11-16

Full Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-11-16/fedora_atomic_wg.2016-11-16-17.00.log.html Summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-11-16/fedora_atomic_wg.2016-11-16-17.00.html === #fedora-meeting-1:

[atomic-wg] Issue #180 `Future of Fedora Dockerfiles`

scollier reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` We need to decide what is going to happen with the Fedora-Dockerfiles repo located here: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles Right now I don't have enough time to maintain these properly.

[atomic-wg] Issue #153 `design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)`

scollier added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > So, I have added my own auth there. For now, i suspect I have been a bit too > optimist with haproxy and the roundrobin setup is not working as I hope (I am > just forwarding the port 8443 to the 3 master nodes, so maybe I should