Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.2 Available Now!

2016-11-09 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 16:02 -0800, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.2 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
> 
> Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
> https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/25
> 
> You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
> locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.2_Summary
> 
> The individual test result pages are:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.2_Installation
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.2_Base
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.2_Server
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.2_Cloud
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.2_Desktop
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.2_Security_Lab
> 
> All RC priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must
> pass in order to meet the RC Release Criteria [3].
> 
> Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the
> test list [5].

There are two changes from RC-1.1 in RC-1.2:

libblockdev-1.9-8.fc25 - 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-76a96e8bf3
selinux-policy-3.13.1-224.fc25 - 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f29b746f2e

those fix a couple of partitioning bugs kparal found in RC-1.1:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393379
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393373

Unfortunately both packages can at least *theoretically* affect almost
anything else (selinux-policy for obvious reasons, and libblockdev
because anaconda uses it), so it would be good to re-run as many tests
as we can with this compose. Sorry for the extra work, folks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Blogs for F25 release

2016-11-09 Thread Josh Berkus 
On 11/09/2016 09:43 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> I believe we need to communicate a few things for F25:
> 
> 1 - overlayfs - what it is, how to enable it in the various f25 images we 
> release
> 2 - containerized k8s - no longer in atomic host so we have to show people 
> how to use it
> 
> I am already planning to write the first blog post. Any volunteers for the 
> 2nd one.

I was planning to write out "how to install KubeAdm on Atomic"; is that
what you're looking for?


-- 
--
Josh Berkus
Project Atomic
Red Hat OSAS
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Atomic 2016-11-09 RC Testing == Nightly Testing

2016-11-09 Thread Sayan Chowdhury 
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> In Fedora Atomic the release process is disjoint from the rest of
> Fedora in that our images aren't produced as part of the normal
> "production" composes and RCs.
>
> I will make it a point to send out an email like this on the same day
> that every RC is created in Fedora so that we can attempt to verify
> our images continue to work throughout the process.
>
> Please take some time and attempt to confirm our images from last
> nights compose is working:
>
> [qcow]
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-
> 25-20161109.n.0/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/
> Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64.qcow2
>
> [vagrant-libvirt]
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-
> 25-20161109.n.0/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/
> Fedora-Atomic-Vagrant-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box
>
> [vagrant-virtualbox]
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-
> 25-20161109.n.0/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/
> Fedora-Atomic-Vagrant-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
>
>
> Note that currently the ISO images aren't getting created. This is
> tracked in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392698
>
>
> Dusty
> ___
> cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>

Here is the list of AMIs

Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (us-west-2)
ami-2cdf7c4chvm   standard
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (us-west-1)
ami-61164301hvm   standard
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (sa-east-1)
ami-14c15e78hvm   standard
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (eu-west-1)
ami-d17325a2hvm   standard
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (eu-central-1)
ami-5bf70d34hvm   standard
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (ap-southeast-2)
ami-0c46796fhvm   standard
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (ap-southeast-1)
ami-3319b950hvm   standard
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (us-west-2)
ami-bfd97adfhvm   gp2
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (ap-northeast-1)
ami-b0349ad1hvm   standard
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (sa-east-1)
ami-b1c05fddhvm   gp2
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (us-west-1)
ami-7c11441chvm   gp2
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (eu-central-1)
ami-53f70d3chvm   gp2
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (eu-west-1)
ami-4a732539hvm   gp2
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (ap-southeast-2)
ami-13457a70hvm   gp2
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (ap-southeast-1)
ami-2b19b948hvm   gp2
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (us-east-1)
ami-3fb69428hvm   standard
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (ap-northeast-1)
ami-923698f3hvm   gp2
Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64  EC2 (us-east-1)
ami-dab597cdhvm   gp2


-- 
Sayan Chowdhury <https://sayanchowdhury.dgplug.org/>
Senior Software Engineer, Fedora Engineering - Emerging Platform
GPG Fingerprint : 0F16 E841 E517 225C 7D13  AB3C B023 9931 9CD0 5C8B


Proud to work at The Open Organization!
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!

2016-11-09 Thread Sayan Chowdhury 
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Adam Williamson 
wrote:

> On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 00:36 -0800, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.1 is now
> > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
> >
> > Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
> > https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/25
> >
> > You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
> > locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Summary
> >
> > The individual test result pages are:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_
> RC_1.1_Installation
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Base
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Server
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Cloud
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Desktop
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_
> RC_1.1_Security_Lab
> >
> > All RC priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must
> > pass in order to meet the RC Release Criteria [3].
> >
> > Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the
> > test list [5].
> >
> > Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs:
> > http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
> >
> > [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-25/f-25-quality-tasks.html
> > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
> > [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_RC_Release_Criteria
> > [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa
> > [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.
> fedoraproject.org/
>
> Hi folks! Sending this along to more lists, with an extra note: the
> Fedora 25 Go/No-Go is on Thursday - yes, tomorrow for most of the world
> - so we need YOU to help run all the tests! We need to fill out all of
> the Alpha, Beta and Final (not 'RC', as the mail says...I should fix
> that) tests on all the validation pages. Some particular tests that
> it'd be great to have people working on are the Server tests, non-
> English installs, and the Desktop 'menus' tests, which basically mean
> 'install Workstation or KDE and run every single app that's installed
> and make sure they all at least basically work'.
>
> If you run into any serious issues, please propose them as Final
> blockers, either using blockerbugs:
> https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/propose_bug
> or simply by marking the bug as 'Blocks: FinalBlocker' (and please add
> a comment with an explanation of why you think it should block
> release).
>
> Thanks a lot, everyone!
>
> Note, there is one bug currently accepted as a blocker which is not
> addressed by this compose:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382001
>
> but there is clearly some sentiment to drop its blocker status, so we
> decided to go ahead and run a compose and get it tested so if we do
> decide to drop that bug from the blocker list, and no other blockers
> appear, we can ship.
> --
>

List of AMIs for RC1 compose

Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (us-west-2)
ami-fbc7649bhvm   gp2
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (us-west-2)
ami-cfc764afhvm   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (us-west-2)
ami-6bcb680bparavirtual   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (us-west-1)
ami-cef5bfaeparavirtual   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (sa-east-1)
ami-8fc05fe3paravirtual   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (eu-west-1)
ami-e25e0891paravirtual   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (eu-central-1)
ami-91fd07feparavirtual   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (ap-southeast-2)
ami-394c735aparavirtual   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (ap-southeast-1)
ami-0e13b36dparavirtual   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (us-west-1)
ami-b7f6bcd7hvm   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (sa-east-1)
ami-2de57a41hvm   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (eu-west-1)
ami-6a530519hvm   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (eu-central-1)
ami-ecfc0683hvm   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (ap-southeast-2)
ami-104e7173hvm   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (ap-southeast-1)
ami-0f13b36chvm   standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64   EC2 (us-west-2)
ami-61ca6901paravirtual   gp2
Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-1.1.x86_64

Blogs for F25 release

2016-11-09 Thread Dusty Mabe 
I believe we need to communicate a few things for F25:

1 - overlayfs - what it is, how to enable it in the various f25 images we 
release
2 - containerized k8s - no longer in atomic host so we have to show people how 
to use it

I am already planning to write the first blog post. Any volunteers for the 2nd 
one.


Any more blogs that need to go out? 

Dusty 
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Atomic 2016-11-09 RC Testing == Nightly Testing

2016-11-09 Thread Dusty Mabe 
Hey all,

In Fedora Atomic the release process is disjoint from the rest of
Fedora in that our images aren't produced as part of the normal
"production" composes and RCs.

I will make it a point to send out an email like this on the same day
that every RC is created in Fedora so that we can attempt to verify
our images continue to work throughout the process.

Please take some time and attempt to confirm our images from last
nights compose is working:

[qcow]
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-25-20161109.n.0/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/Fedora-Atomic-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64.qcow2

[vagrant-libvirt]
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-25-20161109.n.0/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/Fedora-Atomic-Vagrant-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box

[vagrant-virtualbox]
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-25-20161109.n.0/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/Fedora-Atomic-Vagrant-25-20161109.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box


Note that currently the ISO images aren't getting created. This is
tracked in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392698


Dusty
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #158 `Proposed website changes for Cloud Base → Atomic Host switch`

2016-11-09 Thread Dusty Mabe 

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> The dark text on purple around "atomic cli" is a little tough to read.

Yeah, on this page: https://stg.getfedora.org/en/cloud/ - the Atomic CLI 
section does not look good.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/158
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #158 `Proposed website changes for Cloud Base → Atomic Host switch`

2016-11-09 Thread Jason Brooks 

jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
The dark text on purple around "atomic cli" is a little tough to read.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/158
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #160 `Ship fedora-motd in F24 atomic image`

2016-11-09 Thread Ratnadeep Debnath 

rtnpro added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@walters I got that. I will fix fedora-motd based on your feedback and share it 
for review by this weekend.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/160
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: su-exec in Fedora Base Image

2016-11-09 Thread Dusty Mabe 


On 11/08/2016 03:57 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Someone's written a tiny C implementation of gosu:
>>
>> https://github.com/ncopa/su-exec
> 
> This is seems close to `runuser` from util-linux,
> which would just need to be taught an option like
> --exec to `execve` rather than having a parent process.
> And to not run through the PAM session stack.

Could we open an issue upstream to vet this as an alternative?

Either way it seems like there is a perceived use case here that isn't
being addressed. We should consider the options.

Dusty
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!

2016-11-09 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 00:36 -0800, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.1 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
> 
> Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
> https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/25
> 
> You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
> locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Summary
> 
> The individual test result pages are:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Installation
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Base
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Server
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Cloud
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Desktop
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.1_Security_Lab
> 
> All RC priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must
> pass in order to meet the RC Release Criteria [3].
> 
> Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the
> test list [5].
> 
> Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs:
> http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
> 
> [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-25/f-25-quality-tasks.html
> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
> [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_RC_Release_Criteria
> [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa
> [5] 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/

Hi folks! Sending this along to more lists, with an extra note: the
Fedora 25 Go/No-Go is on Thursday - yes, tomorrow for most of the world
- so we need YOU to help run all the tests! We need to fill out all of
the Alpha, Beta and Final (not 'RC', as the mail says...I should fix
that) tests on all the validation pages. Some particular tests that
it'd be great to have people working on are the Server tests, non-
English installs, and the Desktop 'menus' tests, which basically mean
'install Workstation or KDE and run every single app that's installed
and make sure they all at least basically work'.

If you run into any serious issues, please propose them as Final
blockers, either using blockerbugs:
https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/propose_bug
or simply by marking the bug as 'Blocks: FinalBlocker' (and please add
a comment with an explanation of why you think it should block
release).

Thanks a lot, everyone!

Note, there is one bug currently accepted as a blocker which is not
addressed by this compose:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382001

but there is clearly some sentiment to drop its blocker status, so we
decided to go ahead and run a compose and get it tested so if we do
decide to drop that bug from the blocker list, and no other blockers
appear, we can ship.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org