[atomic-wg] Issue #304: Update to kubernetes 1.7.x

strigazi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > Or, we could track the latest in Fedora stable and the alpha releases in > rawhide -- that seems a bit more true to rawhide, and still worthwhile, but I > can imagine people wanting to run the N-1 version, and we don't have a way

[atomic-wg] Issue #295: Start using new mailing list/IRC channel around f26 release time

jlebon added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > discussions and troubleshooting Fedora build pipeline/releng (bodhi, punji, > etc.) for Atomic will be on the new channel #fedora-atomic. Content > discussions which start there will get re-directed to #atomic. Sorry if I'm missing

Minutes for meeting

=== #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_wg === Meeting started by jberkus at 17:01:42 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-07-19/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-07-19-17.01.log.html .

[atomic-wg] Issue #295: Start using new mailing list/IRC channel around f26 release time

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Discussion in the meeting today and votes in the ticket means we are approving jberkus' proposal. the [mailing list](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/atomic.lists.fedoraproject.org/) has been created and the irc channel

[atomic-wg] Issue #297: Disable deltarpms in the Fedora base docker image

The issue: `Disable deltarpms in the Fedora base docker image` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `maxamillion` by maxamillion. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/297 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

[atomic-wg] Issue #295: Start using new mailing list/IRC channel around f26 release time

sinnykumari added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` +1 to jberkus' proposal. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/295 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[atomic-wg] Issue #295: Start using new mailing list/IRC channel around f26 release time

jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @jlebon that was suggested, but @dustymabe really wanted a separate channel, and nobody argued against it. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/295

[atomic-wg] Issue #295: Start using new mailing list/IRC channel around f26 release time

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` +1 to the @jberkus proposal `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/295 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[atomic-wg] Issue #295: Start using new mailing list/IRC channel around f26 release time

maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` +1 to jberkus' proposal. :thumbsup: `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/295 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #295: Start using new mailing list/IRC channel around f26 release time

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > Sorry if I'm missing context from the IRC #fedora-cloud convo, but isn't the > proper place for those discussions in #fedora-releng? Is it worth having a > separate channel just for FAH releng? If that's really the case, then

[atomic-wg] Issue #299: Concerns related to enabling Atomic Host CloudImages compose in Rawhide for multi-arches

sinnykumari added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > > we need to experiment with reqpart and see if it does the right thing for > atomic - are you able to run imagefactory locally and experiment? > > Haven't checked how reqpart works, will look into it. Yes, we can use reqpart

Re: FYI: rawhide ostrees not building because of dep issues

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > Bug is already filed against the correct component. This is just an FYI. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472573 You've got the wrong end of the stick, nothing provides libxenctrl.so.4.8 because xen was

[atomic-wg] Issue #304: Update to kubernetes 1.7.x

strigazi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > @jchaloup is a hero indeed! > @strigazi, is the proposal here to eventually get kube 1.7.x into fedora 26? If FA26 continues to ship kubernetes in it I think it should contain 1.7.x. In 70 days 1.8.x will be out and fedora 26

Re: FYI: rawhide ostrees not building because of dep issues

On 07/19/2017 04:12 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> Bug is already filed against the correct component. This is just an FYI. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472573 > > You've got the wrong end of the

Re: FYI: rawhide ostrees not building because of dep issues

On 07/18/2017 11:28 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > Bug is already filed against the correct component. This is just an FYI. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472573 > This is resolved with last nights ostree compose: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20609382

Re: FYI: rawhide ostrees not building because of dep issues

On 07/19/2017 07:55 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > You worded it differently to that, it was a known problem, they were > having issues rebuilding due to the breakage in s390x, so it was > already in progress. Can you help explain to me what I did wrong? AFAIK I found a problem and opened a

FYI - pagure.io/atomic-wg emails are now going to ato...@list.fp.o

They will no longer be sent to the cloud list. Please subscribe to the atomic list if you wish to receive them: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/atomic.lists.fedoraproject.org/ ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: FYI: rawhide ostrees not building because of dep issues

>> You worded it differently to that, it was a known problem, they were >> having issues rebuilding due to the breakage in s390x, so it was >> already in progress. > > Can you help explain to me what I did wrong? > > AFAIK I found a problem and opened a bug against the correct component. > I had

Re: FYI: rawhide ostrees not building because of dep issues

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 07/19/2017 08:49 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: You worded it differently to that, it was a known problem, they were having issues rebuilding due to the breakage in s390x, so it was already in progress. >>>

Re: FYI: rawhide ostrees not building because of dep issues

On 07/19/2017 08:49 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> You worded it differently to that, it was a known problem, they were >>> having issues rebuilding due to the breakage in s390x, so it was >>> already in progress. >> >> Can you help explain to me what I did wrong? >> >> AFAIK I found a problem

Fedora Atomic WG - Changes to IRC/Mailing list

TL;DR There is a new fedora atomic mailing list [1] and IRC channel [2], but the mailing list should only be used for automated messages and the IRC channel should be used only when something extremely Fedora specific (like releng bits) is being discussed. Otherwise please

[atomic-wg] Issue #304: Update to kubernetes 1.7.x

jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` The kubernetes project maintains two releases at a time -- one way we might approach this is to keep the newer release in rawhide and the N-1 release in Fedora stable, and swap when a new upstream releases goes GA. As long as we

[atomic-wg] Issue #304: Update to kubernetes 1.7.x

strigazi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > The kubernetes project maintains two releases at a time -- one way we might > approach this is to keep the newer release in rawhide and the N-1 release in > Fedora stable, and swap when a new upstream releases goes GA. As long as

[atomic-wg] Issue #304: Update to kubernetes 1.7.x

jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Or, we could track the latest in Fedora stable and the alpha releases in rawhide -- that seems a bit more true to rawhide, and still worthwhile, but I can imagine people wanting to run the N-1 version, and we don't have a way of

Re: FYI: rawhide ostrees not building because of dep issues

On 07/19/2017 09:10 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> I agree maybe I could have done more, but I maintain that I didn't do >> anything >> incorrect. It would be great if we actually notified when there are issues >>