[DOC] Got XSLT skills? Our PDF docs need your help!

2012-10-16 Thread Jessica Tomechak
Many users like to read documentation in PDFs. The default PDF output from Publican isn't what I would consider good enough for serious publications. It's possible to tweak the transforms to make the PDFs better, but Publican doesn't make this very easy. If you'd like to help make the output of ou

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-358) Fix PDF output for docs

2012-10-16 Thread Jessica Tomechak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13476818#comment-13476818 ] Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-358: - Here's something I found on

RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

2012-10-16 Thread Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Please see my comments inline. -Jayapal From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 10:04 PM To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...

Re: Patch for CS3.x

2012-10-16 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
Hi Ilya, The LDAP is being definitely maintained. Please, send the patch and address that to me. -abhi On 16/10/12 6:39 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: >I made a patch to address LDAP access issue on CS3.0 branch, I was >curious if it's still being maintained, if so, I will can submit a patch, >I'm

[4.1 feature RFC] Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone

2012-10-16 Thread Murali Reddy
I am trying to change EIP semantics supported by CloudStack for 4.1 release. Today if some one deploys a basic zone with EIP service, then by default a public IP is allocated for the user VM along with private IP, and then a 1:1 NAT is established between the public IP and private IP of the user

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-359) PropagateResourceEventCommand failes in cluster configuration

2012-10-16 Thread Hugo Trippaers (JIRA)
Hugo Trippaers created CLOUDSTACK-359: - Summary: PropagateResourceEventCommand failes in cluster configuration Key: CLOUDSTACK-359 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-359 Project

what is the plan for the build system?

2012-10-16 Thread Noa Resare
Hello friends, I've been tasked with looking into the possibility of running cloudstack on Debian stable, and based on my preliminary investigations I have a few questions that I hope that someone can answer. * What is the long term plan for the build system? Right now we use Make (debian/rules),

Re: Rant: Request for better commit messages

2012-10-16 Thread Noah Slater
If there's something Infra might be able to provide, you should start a thread at infrastruct...@apache.org to check. They can be quite accommodating. Especially around Git, etc. One of the things I suggested to them was that it might be nice if CLOUDSTACK-BUGID in a commit message automatically ap

RE: [4.1 feature RFC] Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone

2012-10-16 Thread Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru
Hi Murali, First of all spec is crystal clear and has all the details about what you are planning to do. I have the following few queries after reviewing your FS. (1) Is this enhancement made for enterprise clouds? because, I don't see a reason why on public clouds, tenant doesn't want public

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first round

2012-10-16 Thread Noah Slater
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > > So if I was in your shoes, I wouldn't abstain from voting. +1 I agree with everything Chip said. QA testing is superb, and it's so great that we're doing it. But releasing testing is something else, that is hopefully enough for everyone

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first round

2012-10-16 Thread Noah Slater
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > > > Might be good to indicate the provenance of this image on the wiki, and > > perhaps move it somewhere not on cloud.com, or am I misunderstanding > what > > that communicates? > > I think moving it's build process to an automated approach,

CloudStack event at LinuxCon EU november 8th

2012-10-16 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
Hi folks, The agenda is starting to take shape, register and send me an email if you would like to present your work with CloudStack: http://cloudstack-linuxconeu.eventbrite.com Cheers, -Sebastien

Re: what is the plan for the build system?

2012-10-16 Thread Rohit Yadav
On 16-Oct-2012, at 2:15 PM, Noa Resare wrote: > Hello friends, > > I've been tasked with looking into the possibility of running cloudstack on > Debian stable, and based on my preliminary investigations I have a few > questions that I hope that someone can answer. > > * What is the long term p

Re: [4.1 feature RFC] Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone

2012-10-16 Thread Murali Reddy
Swamy, please see inline comments On 16/10/12 2:19 PM, "Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru" wrote: >Hi Murali, > >First of all spec is crystal clear and has all the details about what you >are planning to do. > >I have the following few queries after reviewing your FS. > >(1) Is this enhancement made f

Re: What Gartner can't - or won't - tell you about OpenStack Cloud

2012-10-16 Thread Noah Slater
+1 to what David said. The best response to most FUD is to a) ignore it, and b) double down on our efforts to make CloudStack rock. Bring on new committers, add more features, ship more software. If there is ever the need to clarify something, it should be done on these lists, to our users. We hav

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Noah Slater
I am running into an error, and would appreciate guidance. $ ant rdeploy Buildfile: /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build.xml [echo] Using build parameters from /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build/build-cloud.properties [ech

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
Did you follow the install Jsch directions ? It's an OSX issue. -sebastien On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:32 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release > 4.0.0-incubating (second round). > > We encourage the whole community to downloa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Noah Slater
$ ls -l /usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 226175 15 Oct 20:10 /usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar -- NS

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
I followed this: http://myvirtual-lab.blogspot.com.es/2009/07/ant-scp-and-ec2.html with updated versions.. On Oct 16, 2012, at 1:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > $ ls -l /usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 226175 15 Oct 20:10 > /usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Noah Slater
Thanks, downloading the binary distribution of Ant and manually copying ant-jsch.jar worked for me. I have updated the wiki. On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > I followed this: > > http://myvirtual-lab.blogspot.com.es/2009/07/ant-scp-and-ec2.html > > with updated version

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Noah Slater
Now I have this error: $ ant rdeploy Buildfile: /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build.xml [echo] Using build parameters from /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build/build-cloud.properties [echo] Using company info from /private/

Re: [DOCS] Proposed technique for making tooltips from doc XML files

2012-10-16 Thread David Nalley
> > David, > You bring up a question which I meant to ask earlier. Can we be sure that > the URLs of doc pages won't change over time? I think we can, if the > following is true: Each Help link in the UI links to a page under the > correct software version and language on the doc site, like > http:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
Did you clean up: rm -Rf ~/.m2 ssh root@localhost -p 'cd /opt/cloudstack/; rm -rf apache-tomcat-6.0.32; unzip apache-tomcat-6.0.32.zip; cd incubator-cloudstack; git clean -f; git reset --hard; git pull --rebase; git clean -f; git checkout origin/4.0 -b 4.0 -f ' On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:18

FW: Test Case Review for "F5&SRX inline mode"

2012-10-16 Thread Srinivas Vejalla
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 5:56 PM To: Sheng Yang; Sangeetha Hariharan; Srinivas Vejalla; Abhinandan Prateek Cc: #Cloud - Engineering Subject: Test Case Review for "F5&SRX inline mode" Hi, Following is the test plan link for "F5 and SRX inline mode" feature. Please

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Rohit Yadav
On 16-Oct-2012, at 5:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Now I have this error: > > $ ant rdeploy > Buildfile: > /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build.xml > [echo] Using build parameters from > /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build/build

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-360) System VM template isn't copied from Secondary Storage to XenServer's local SR

2012-10-16 Thread Vladimir Ostrovsky (JIRA)
Vladimir Ostrovsky created CLOUDSTACK-360: - Summary: System VM template isn't copied from Secondary Storage to XenServer's local SR Key: CLOUDSTACK-360 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK

Test Case Review for "F5&SRX inline mode"

2012-10-16 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu
Hi, Following is the test plan link for “F5 and SRX inline mode” feature. Please review and send your comments by Friday 19^th Cot 2012 EOD. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/F5-SRX+Inline+Mode Thanks, Sanjeev

Re: What Gartner can't - or won't - tell you about OpenStack Cloud

2012-10-16 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:36:18PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > +1 to what David said. The best response to most FUD is to a) ignore it, > and b) double down on our efforts to make CloudStack rock. Bring on new > committers, add more features, ship more software. +1 to this. > If there is ever th

Reminder: IRC Meeting Wednesday (October 17) at 17:00 UTC

2012-10-16 Thread Joe Brockmeier
This is your friendly reminder that we have a weekly IRC meeting this Wednesday at 17:00 UTC. That's 13:00 Eastern, 10:00 Pacific. We meet in #cloudstack-meeting on Freenode. As always, I'd like to remind folks new to the IRC meetings that the purpose is for discussion in real time. Topics need

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Noah Slater
I am following the instructions from the wiki, copy and paste style. This is the FIRST time the rdeploy thing managed to SSH into the VM. Do these comments still apply? (Should we document them?) On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > On 16-Oct-2012, at 5:48 PM, Noah Slater w

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-351) cloud-set-guest-password.in - include double quotes for variable check when using -n in bash

2012-10-16 Thread ilya b. musayev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477017#comment-13477017 ] ilya b. musayev commented on CLOUDSTACK-351: Awesome, thank you. Sent fro

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-312) enable L4-L7 network services in the shared network in the advanced zone

2012-10-16 Thread Murali Reddy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477042#comment-13477042 ] Murali Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-312: - Functional requirements are documen

RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

2012-10-16 Thread Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Updated the FS as per the discussion. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Static+NAT,+Port+Forwarding+and+Firewall+Implementation+on+SRX Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 16

[4.1 feature RFC] L4-L7 network services in shared network

2012-10-16 Thread Murali Reddy
CloudStack supports guest networks of type isolated and shared. While there is rich support of L4-L7 network services like firewall, NAT, LB in the isolated networks, similar network services are not available in the networks of shared type. While there is EIP and ELB services which provides NAT

RE: What Gartner can't - or won't - tell you about OpenStack Cloud

2012-10-16 Thread Donal Lafferty
On that note, OSCON featured a comparison by Oregon State Uni's Open Source Lab http://www.oscon.com/oscon2012/public/schedule/detail/24376 Slides at http://www.slideshare.net/OReillyOSCON/comparing-open-source-private-cloud-platforms Their lab focuses on our constituency: open source develo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Noah Slater
I just tried to clean the source locally and redeploy and get the same error. Chip, can you advise please? On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > I am following the instructions from the wiki, copy and paste style. > > This is the FIRST time the rdeploy thing managed to SSH into

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Chip Childers
I'm offline in a all day meeting. Can someone help Noah please? - chip Sent from my iPhone. On Oct 16, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > I just tried to clean the source locally and redeploy and get the same > error. > > Chip, can you advise please? > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:48 PM, N

OSCON comparison of CloudStack, OpenStack, Eucalyptus, and Google's Ganeti

2012-10-16 Thread Donal Lafferty
[Resending under new subject; dropping "What Gartner..."] On that note, OSCON featured a comparison by Oregon State Uni's Open Source Lab http://www.oscon.com/oscon2012/public/schedule/detail/24376 Slides at http://www.slideshare.net/OReillyOSCON/comparing-open-source-private-cloud-platform

RE: Egress firewall rules for guest network.

2012-10-16 Thread Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Though CreateNetworkACL and CreateFirewallRule APIs are configuring the firewall rules, but there is difference in the purpose for which it is used. CreateNetworkACL - API is used for configuring firewall rules per Network. CreateFirewallRule - API is used for

kvm lacking of GetDomRVersionCmd implementation lead to deployVm fail.

2012-10-16 Thread cloudstacks
i am tracing this problem. but i ask about it first. 1.what it use for? what kinds of data it return when launch GetDomRVersionCmd if i write missing parts? now i only know when new a routerVM(which created when new a userVM) because of missing GetDomRVersionCmd , its answer result is fa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Rohit Yadav
Okay, I re-read the logs and found the issues: 1. If you're using PPA: natecarlson/maven3, we will have to use mvn3, so mvn3 -P deps. Updated the 4.0 test procedure wiki. 2. Since, we've moved from ant and we clean the repository in Test the Build section. This cleans up target and dist folder

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Rohit Yadav
Another issue I found was that we're cleaning DevCloud, which cleans the override/templates.sql, pl. make a backup of it. And, pl. rdeploydb to start afresh, your old devcloud image will have old database (3.x) which will be failed by DatabaseUpgradeChecker upon ant rdebug. Edison, can we crea

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Sailaja Mada
Hi, Validated using Rhel 6.3 OSS build with hypervisor Xen 6.0.2 . Basic , Advanced Zone Configuration and VM Life Cycle operations are validated using the build @ CloudStack-oss-4.0.0-701.tar . My vote is +1 . Thanks and Regards, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Chip Childers

Re: kvm lacking of GetDomRVersionCmd implementation lead to deployVm fail.

2012-10-16 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I have generally only seen the getDomRVersionCmd fail followed by stopping the vm if it can't ssh into the system VM to run the command. I am sure this is a general symptom of failing to set up or communicate with the virtual router rather than an actual issue related to getting the domr version.

Re: kvm lacking of GetDomRVersionCmd implementation lead to deployVm fail.

2012-10-16 Thread Marcus Sorensen
By the way, KVM doesn't lack GetDomRVersionCmd. It's in core/src/com/cloud/agent/resource/virtualnetwork/VirtualRoutingResource.java, and it calls getDomRVersion, which runs router_proxy.sh (a script on the host that will SSH into the router VM) to call get_template_version.sh within the router. O

Re: Stop instance is destroying my VM

2012-10-16 Thread Min Chen
Thanks Lee for clarification. Then my next natural question is: what is the difference between stop instance and destroy instance (which are also shown on CloudStack UI)? -min On 10/15/12 7:33 PM, "Gavin Lee" wrote: >It's by design, when you stop a VM (advanceStop() in >VirtualMachineManagerImp

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Edison Su
Rdeploydb will recreate db in devcloud, right? It's documented in the test procedure. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 16, 2012, at 9:15 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > Another issue I found was that we're cleaning DevCloud, which cleans the > override/templates.sql, pl. make a backup of it. And, pl. r

Re: Stop instance is destroying my VM

2012-10-16 Thread Marcus Sorensen
In CloudStack, stop means to power off the VM (with a force optional), destroy means to delete the VM. It's sort of confusing, because 'destroy' tends to mean 'force shut down' in KVM/libvirt and Xen rather than deleting. On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Min Chen wrote: > Thanks Lee for clarifi

Re: Stop instance is destroying my VM

2012-10-16 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
On 10/16/12 9:46 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Thanks Lee for clarification. Then my next natural question is: what is >the difference between stop instance and destroy instance (which are also >shown on CloudStack UI)? cloudStack doesn't send any commands to the backend on DestroyVm command. The vm i

Re: Stop instance is destroying my VM

2012-10-16 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
Forgot to mention: if Destroy command is called on vm in Running state, cloudStack: * Stops vm on the backend (just the way we do when StopVm command is executed, so you no longer see the vm on the hypervisor) * marks vm as Destroyed in the DB. On 10/16/12 9:53 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >O

Re: Egress firewall rules for guest network.

2012-10-16 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
On 10/16/12 8:34 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" wrote: > >Though CreateNetworkACL and CreateFirewallRule APIs are configuring >the firewall rules, but there is difference in the purpose for which it >is used. >CreateNetworkACL - API is used for configuring firewall >rules per Ne

Re: Stop instance is destroying my VM

2012-10-16 Thread Min Chen
Thanks Alena, So destroying an already stopped VM is just updating CloudStack DB without interacting with hypervisor, do we send hypervisor command when we expunge the destroyed VM? Thanks -min On 10/16/12 9:54 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >Forgot to mention: if Destroy command is called on v

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-238) vpn:fail to connect to vpnserver using non-sourceNAT IP

2012-10-16 Thread Sonny Chhen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sonny Chhen reassigned CLOUDSTACK-238: -- Assignee: Jessica Wang (was: Pranav Saxena) > vpn:fail to connect to vpnserver

Re: Stop instance is destroying my VM

2012-10-16 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
On 10/16/12 10:04 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Thanks Alena, So destroying an already stopped VM is just updating >CloudStack DB without interacting with hypervisor, do we send hypervisor >command when we expunge the >destroyed VM? Yes. > >Thanks >-min > >On 10/16/12 9:54 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk" >wr

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Rohit Yadav
Yes, but the wiki also also suggests to clean DevCloud: ssh root@localhost -p 'cd /opt/cloudstack/; rm -rf apache-tomcat-6.0.32; unzip apache-tomcat-6.0.32.zip; cd incubator-cloudstack; git clean -f; git reset --hard; git pull --rebase; git clean -f; git checkout origin/4.0 -b 4.0 -f ' Th

CloudStack Campo Feature List - not public

2012-10-16 Thread Musayev, Ilya
Can we make Campo feature list not password protected like Burbank? It seems like only some people can see it (I certainly cant, eventhough I have an account cloudstack.org) http://confluence.cloudstack.org/display/PM/Campo

RE: Stop instance is destroying my VM

2012-10-16 Thread Min Chen
According to Gavin, stopVM has already deleted vm metadata from xenserver database, what extra cleanup is done in expunge call besides destroying vm volumes? I guess that my confusion is this: for a normal end-user, how can he relate our CloudStack UI exposed operations (stop and destroy) to sim

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Edison Su
Why it failed? Any log? The same procedure works for me and chip. > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:11 AM > To: Edison Su > Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second > round >

Re: Stop instance is destroying my VM

2012-10-16 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
On 10/16/12 10:19 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: >According to Gavin, stopVM has already deleted vm metadata from xenserver >database, what extra cleanup is done in expunge call besides destroying >vm volumes? I guess that my confusion is this: for a normal end-user, how >can he relate our CloudStack UI e

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Rohit Yadav
I checked again this time with a fresh devcloud, the commands that clean up devcloud's git repo and pulls new code removes dist/ which caused issue for Noah. It's fixed in 4.0 now. I think I may have messed up build/override/, so it gave me deploydb errors but with fresh devcloud import, no erro

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Marcus Sorensen
my vote is -1... got stuck in ErrorInMaintenance. We need to cherry pick a5bca0999aa010252b1390c4db6dc5023967ab06 from master. On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > I checked again this time with a fresh devcloud, the commands that clean up > devcloud's git repo and pulls new co

Re: F5 SRX in inline mode and Remote access vpn on SRX

2012-10-16 Thread Sheng Yang
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > One request: > Some answers seem guarded: "seems", "maybe", "probably". Of course we may > not have all answers, but how do we track these uncertainties as they get > resolved? We've identified SRX have some serious limitations on remote

Re: F5 & SRX in in-line mode PRD review

2012-10-16 Thread Sheng Yang
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > >>> >>> 4. Since both SRX and F5 are being programmed when creating a LB rule , >>>if either one of them is down/unreachable , we should expect the LB rule >>>creation to error out . In such cases , will we be providing an error >>>messag

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Edison Su
Need to merge another one also: commit 915babd970a9b4f209deceb3c4973b7d1c9c0c12 Author: Marcus Sorensen Date: Wed Sep 26 17:14:57 2012 -0700 fix kvm traffic labels (guest traffic types on multiple networks don't work) > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shado

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Rohit Yadav
Edison/Marcus please test and cherry pick both of them to 4.0? Thanks. They were not blocker on 4.0 may be that's why we did not cherry-pick them. But we should be in code freeze, otherwise there will be many bugs/features which are targeted for 4.1.0 and they apply for 4.0.0 too. Regards.

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Edison Su
Oh, I see why I didn't merge 915babd970a9b4f209deceb3c4973b7d1c9c0c12 into 4.0 branch, as the commit is too disruptive. I'd rather like to leave it as it is for 4.0: no support for guest traffic type on multiple physical networks in 4.0 on KVM. Translates to plain English, is that you can't crea

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-361) Wrong creation of guest networks on a KVM host in Multiple Physical Networks with guest traffic

2012-10-16 Thread Chandan Purushothama (JIRA)
Chandan Purushothama created CLOUDSTACK-361: --- Summary: Wrong creation of guest networks on a KVM host in Multiple Physical Networks with guest traffic Key: CLOUDSTACK-361 URL: https://issues.apache.org/j

[DOCS] Not posting 4.0 docs to website?

2012-10-16 Thread Jessica Tomechak
Just checking up on the issue linked below, "post docs to new doc website," and I notice it's stalled. Comments from Noah and Chip are to the effect "this can wait until after we get the software out." I'd just like to go on record that I think it would be very helpful to users if we can get these

Re: [DOCS] Proposed technique for making tooltips from doc XML files

2012-10-16 Thread Jessica Tomechak
> > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 5:19 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DOCS] Proposed technique for making tooltips from doc XML > files > > > > > David, > > You bring up a question which I meant

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-361) Wrong creation of guest networks on a KVM host in Multiple Physical Networks with guest traffic

2012-10-16 Thread Prasanna Santhanam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477298#comment-13477298 ] Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-361: --- Looks like KVM multiple

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-362) Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-137 Upgrade Script fails

2012-10-16 Thread ilya musayev (JIRA)
ilya musayev created CLOUDSTACK-362: --- Summary: Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-137 Upgrade Script fails Key: CLOUDSTACK-362 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-362 Project: CloudSt

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-362) Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-137 Upgrade Script fails

2012-10-16 Thread ilya musayev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ilya musayev updated CLOUDSTACK-362: Description: I've installed Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-101 few week back and toda

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-362) Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-137 Upgrade Script fails

2012-10-16 Thread ilya musayev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ilya musayev updated CLOUDSTACK-362: Description: I've installed Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-101 few week back and toda

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-362) Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-137 Upgrade Script fails

2012-10-16 Thread ilya musayev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ilya musayev updated CLOUDSTACK-362: Description: I've installed Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-101 few week back and toda

Re: git commit: DevCloud: Make sure destination paths exists before scp

2012-10-16 Thread David Nalley
Is there a reason this only hit 4.0? --David On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:09 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/4.0 6c6d9bb89 -> 53a3c2f17 > > > DevCloud: Make sure destination paths exists before scp > > Makes dirs if they are not present before scp-ing target/ and dist/ to > devcloud

Re: CloudStack Campo Feature List - not public

2012-10-16 Thread David Nalley
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Can we make Campo feature list not password protected like Burbank? It seems > like only some people can see it (I certainly cant, eventhough I have an > account cloudstack.org) > > http://confluence.cloudstack.org/display/PM/Campo > > Sor

RE: git commit: DevCloud: Make sure destination paths exists before scp

2012-10-16 Thread Rohit Yadav
This (DevCloud using ant) only works with ant and since we've maven on master now, it's not applicable for master. From: David Nalley [da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:47 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: git commit:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Marcus Sorensen
That's fine. I understand Edison's issue but the one I mention is a fairly problematic bug and a simple fix. Not sure where the line should be as far as blockers but I think this should be merged in personally. On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Oh, I see why I didn't merge 915ba

RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

2012-10-16 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan
Hi Jayapal, Had the following questions after reviewing the FS. 1) "Case 4: Firewall rule is not deleted when disable the Static NAT. 1. Acquire Ip P4. 2. Create Firewall for port 22. 3. Enable static NAT on P2 for VM2. 4. Disable static NAT. 5. Enable static NAT 7.PublicNetwork# ssh (ssh to VM

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Edison Su
Yah, the one you mentioned is a simple fix, not a blocker IMHO. It only be triggered when there is an race condition: " but indeed there is a race condition between migrating thread and delta sync thread" from the commence send by Mice. I'll merge a5bca0999aa010252b1390c4db6dc5023967ab06 into 4.0

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-361) Wrong creation of guest networks on a KVM host in Multiple Physical Networks with guest traffic

2012-10-16 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su reassigned CLOUDSTACK-361: Assignee: Marcus Sorensen It should be fixed on master branch in commit 915babd970a9b4

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-361) Wrong creation of guest networks on a KVM host in Multiple Physical Networks with guest traffic

2012-10-16 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su updated CLOUDSTACK-361: - Fix Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0) 4.1.0 > Wrong creation of guest ne

Ui: History view

2012-10-16 Thread Sonny Chhen
Hello All, Below is a link to a description of a minor ui update we're calling history view. This will allow you to rollover the breadcrumb and view the panel information without needing to click on the corresponding breadcrumb. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+-+Histor

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-363) Ugrades from 2.2.14, 3.0.2 to the Current build will fail

2012-10-16 Thread Chandan Purushothama (JIRA)
Chandan Purushothama created CLOUDSTACK-363: --- Summary: Ugrades from 2.2.14, 3.0.2 to the Current build will fail Key: CLOUDSTACK-363 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-363

Re: git commit: DevCloud: Make sure destination paths exists before scp

2012-10-16 Thread David Nalley
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > This (DevCloud using ant) only works with ant and since we've maven on master > now, it's not applicable for master. > Ahh - ok - thanks for explaining! --David

RE: git commit: DevCloud: Make sure destination paths exists before scp

2012-10-16 Thread Edison Su
I think we don't need this patch at all, target/dist folder are created when I build devcloud, so if you don't delete them explicitly, there shouldn't have any problem. But anyway, it's no harm to add this patch. > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com] > S

Re: Ui: History view

2012-10-16 Thread John Kinsella
Was this user-requested? It doesn't look "minor," and looks more like something that would cause annoyance, at least IMHO... On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Sonny Chhen wrote: > Hello All, > > Below is a link to a description of a minor ui update we're calling history > view. This will allow yo

Re: Ui: History view

2012-10-16 Thread David Nalley
Same opinion here - at best distracting - at worst I fear we'll get bugs filed because it still shows the 'action' buttons, but per the description it would disappear before you navigated to them, and would never be clickable. --David On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:09 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > Was t

RE: Ui: History view

2012-10-16 Thread Sonny Chhen
Hello John, This was more of a ux addition. It's similar in how you get a preview thumbnail in the taskbar in windows 7 when you rollover an item; but for individual panels. There is a timeout period that should avoid instant popups and annoyance. Thanks You and Best Regards, Sonny H. Chhen M

RE: [DOCS] Not posting 4.0 docs to website?

2012-10-16 Thread Kevin Kluge
I don't see how we can ship without the RPM install docs posted. Once you build the RPMs I haven't found anything posted that tells you what to do. Seems like many developers and all non-developers will fail at the install. Am I missing something? -kevin > -Original Message- > From

Re: History view

2012-10-16 Thread Jessica Tomechak
> -Original Message- > From: Sonny Chhen [mailto:sonny.ch...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:03 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Ui: History view > > Hello All, > > Below is a link to a description of a minor ui update we're calling > history view. Thi

RE: Ui: History view

2012-10-16 Thread Kelcey Damage (BBITS)
I like the 'glass' border effect Not sure I like the 'history' windows style hover panal. KELCEY DAMAGE Infrastructure Systems Architect www.backbonetechnology.com - kel...@bbits.ca address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancou

Re: [DOCS] Not posting 4.0 docs to website?

2012-10-16 Thread David Nalley
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Just checking up on the issue linked below, "post docs to new doc website," > and I notice it's stalled. Comments from Noah and Chip are to the effect > "this can wait until after we get the software out." I'd just like to go on > record t

Re: [DOCS] Not posting 4.0 docs to website?

2012-10-16 Thread Chip Childers
Jessica, I think you misinterpreted me (which might be my fault). IMO, we absolutely need the documentation to be posted to the site as part of the rollout of 4.0.0-incubating. In fact, I started a thread about this previously [1]. This includes most of the issues that David mentioned below. T

RE: History view

2012-10-16 Thread Sonny Chhen
Thanks for the feedback all. -We can rework the name to make more sense, perhaps panel preview. -I like the glass effect too. -We will investigate this more in terms of being able to select items from the preview. For now this is to help with usability in the manner that Jessica mentioned. T

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Chip Childers
OK - so in reading through this thread, I believe we are in a position where we will need to restart the vote again. We are aborting this vote. I will package up another RC, and start a third round of voting this evening or tomorrow morning (depending on how my schedule works out). I'd like to a

Re: Stop instance is destroying my VM

2012-10-16 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
To an ordinary user, there is no concept of a hypervisor: the only VM state machine she interacts with is CloudStack's. On 10/16/12 7:26 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >On 10/16/12 10:19 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: > >>According to Gavin, stopVM has already deleted vm metadata from xenserver >>datab

Re: [DOCS] Not posting 4.0 docs to website?

2012-10-16 Thread Jessica Tomechak
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Jessica Tomechak < jessica.tomec...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just checking up on the issue linked below, "post docs to new doc > website," and I notice it's stalled. Comments from Noah and Chip are to the > effect "this can wait until after we get the software out." I'

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Chandan Purushothama
Hello Chip, I filed a blocker bug for Upgrade https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-363 Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:47 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Marcus Sor

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

2012-10-16 Thread Chip Childers
Thanks. Any volunteers to address this issue? - chip Sent from my iPhone. On Oct 16, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Chandan Purushothama wrote: > Hello Chip, > > I filed a blocker bug for Upgrade > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-363 > > Thank you, > Chandan. > > -Original Message---

  1   2   >