essage-
> From: Boylan, James [mailto:james.boy...@orbitz.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:18 PM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I agree with Tamas. Cloudstack has functionality that would allow
t; From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:kevin.kl...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 26 November 2012 19:03
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> >
> > I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional
> interfac
and Elastic IP capabilities to achieve a similar result", etc...
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hari Kannan
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:02 AM
>
object? I can imagine if the implementation is bad, we can reject it, but
>> are there any other reasons to NOT implement a feature?
>>
>> PS1: While this feature is an example, I want to under the general
>> process/guideline for future reference
>>
>> Hari Kannan
>
consensus one way or the other on the *what/why* stage...
Regards,
Hari Kannan
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:02 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
Great questions!
So first, a
riginal Message-
> From: Boylan, James [mailto:james.boy...@orbitz.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:18 PM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I agree with Tamas. Cloudstack has functionality that would allow
&
[mailto:james.boy...@orbitz.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:18 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
I agree with Tamas. Cloudstack has functionality that would allow
implementations using NAT/LoadBalancer configurations that would not re
address requirement.
-- James
From: Tamas Monos [tam...@veber.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:20 AM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
Hi,
Also I have tested earlier 3.0.2 and if you create mul
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:kevin.kl...@citrix.com]
Sent: 26 November 2012 19:03
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional
> interfaces
>
> I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional
> interfaces.
> I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at machine
> instantiation and still handing out addresses to all interfaces via DHCP, but
> not
> all OSes will handle that cleanly.
As
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 6:41 PM
> To: 'cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> > I also argue that what they are asking for really is in conflict of the
> > purpose of
> a cloud environment.
>
&
onsensus on how to
>even accomplish this, let alone the specific mechanics of how it will
>work.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Boylan, James [mailto:james.boy...@orbitz.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 5:51 PM
>To: 'cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org'
&g
ay, November 21, 2012 5:51 PM
To: 'cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
I also argue that what they are asking for really is in conflict of the purpose
of a cloud environment. If you are merely after a virtualized environment you
can use vs
cloud architecture
friendly. (using NAT and isolated private networks for one)
-- James
- Original Message -
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 06:12 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one ins
> - it is expected that there is a 'primary ip' assigned by DHCP and the
> additional ips are assigned manually by the VM owner. However additional
> ips are requested through CS API/UI.
I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding
additional interfaces. I'd almost argue for requi
e going to go to a
>competitor.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Boylan, James [mailto:james.boy...@orbitz.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:46 AM
>To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
>Single NIC. I can d
27;re going to go to a competitor.
-Original Message-
From: Boylan, James [mailto:james.boy...@orbitz.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:46 AM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
Single NIC. I can definitely seeing situation
mber 2012 20:05
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> It is an interesting topic - as I see it, there seem to be some
> hypervisors/OS limitations (on virtual environments) that, while allowing
> multiple nics per VM, limit the numb
e.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
It is an interesting topic - as I see it, there seem to be some
hypervisors/OS limitations (on virtual environments) that, while allowing
multiple nics per VM, limit the number - so, by extending in 2 dimensions
(multiple nics per vm and multip
I can think of a few. Also some people stay with what they know.
-Original Message-
From: Boylan, James [mailto:james.boy...@orbitz.com]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:46
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
Single NIC. I can definitely s
even possible to have multiple IPs per nic on
basic zone)..
-Original Message-
From: Boylan, James [mailto:james.boy...@orbitz.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:46 AM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
Single NIC. I can definit
nment.)
-- James
-Original Message-
From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:42 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
@James: Are you saying there is no benefit in having a single
...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:29 AM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If
that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
But if customer requests it then you need to provide it. May people use IP
locking than port locking for SSL certs.
-Original Message-
From: Boylan, James [mailto:james.boy...@orbitz.com]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:37
To: cloud
to:jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest
network as this is where the pool sits. I also request thi
nathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest
network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared a
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If
that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP
will not work because of anti-spoofing.
Anthony
> -Ori
onathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way
> and a dev did post back to say th
-
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes ip's
on the same nic.
*Facundo Guerrero*
*Sy
lto:fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes ip's
on the same nic.
*Facundo Guerrero*
*System Administrator*
*IPaddress integr
to:mhartm...@tls.net]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> >> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >>
> >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per VM
> >> withou
t; Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E: mhartm...@tls.net
>>
>> TLS.NET, Inc.
>> http://www.tls.net
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
>> Sent: Monday, Novemb
And it is hard to implement anti-spoofing if one User VM NIC has multiple IP.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:35 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
ember 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per VM
> without
> having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if I'm hosting a
>
.uk]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
Regards,
Jonathan Bastin
07739668262
- Reply message -
From: "Anthony Xu&quo
.ur...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'. Hope
> fully it will come in 4.1 relea
eddy.ur...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'. Hope
> fully it will come in 4.1
Original Message-
> >From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
> >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> >To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> >Everybody wanting this please vote for
f
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
> >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> >To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> >E
ack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
I have advanced network (I use vlans).
My idea of working would be to DHCP the first ip but allocate the next X amount
to the VPS to allow the user to manually add them to the OS themselves. Thus
limiting the cha
boundaries of
DHCP.
-Original Message-
From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cwe...@iswest.net]
Sent: 16 November 2012 16:31
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
That makes sense, however it only works with advanced networking and I believe
the original post to th
Message-
From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cwe...@iswest.net]
Sent: 16 November 2012 16:31
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
That makes sense, however it only works with advanced networking and I
believe the original post to this was to allow multiple IP addresses
#x27;t get assigned to another instance creating a conflict.
-Original Message-
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 6:21 AM
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
This is not the most elegant solution but
n.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this to
> happen.
>
> -Original Message
This gets my vote
Regards
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
Everybody wanting this please vote for it an
Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this to
happen.
-Original Message-
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar]
Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
I not use the dhcp server to a
2012/11/15 Clayton Weise
> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.o
2 01:00
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Jonathan
>
> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I made
> some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the same VM.
>
>
Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
-Original Message-
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
Jon
e.org
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
Jonathan
Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I made
some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the same VM.
2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> I have made a guest network (cloudstack i
been accepted and ETA set?
-Original Message-
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar]
Sent: 16 November 2012 01:00
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
Jonathan
Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request askin
Jonathan
Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I made
some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the same VM.
2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> networking) with live IP's that is a
52 matches
Mail list logo
