Hi Paul
Weh ad exactly the same issue, tryed with removing newlines adding the whole
cert chain and many other things.
The guy was always refusing due to non printable chars or just failed. Then we
tried over the API and also without success. We ended up with backing up our
database and replac
Chris, at the moment there are no native CloudStack capabilities that can
provide HA across zone, but there are couple of features targeted for 4.2
release.
- GSLB will provide load balancing across the zones in active-active
setup, on zone failure, traffic will be routed to active zone
- AWS EI
Hi,
My physical switch is configured with 3 Vlans (vlan1, vlan200 and vlan300) and
the host is on a tagged trunk port. I must admit I am a bit confused on how I
have to match this in the /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties config file. I have
played a little bit around with it hoping to get it w
On Feb 26, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Carlos Reategui wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I was traveling and not able
> to work on this.
>
> I have added the NFS SR to my host. I was also able to create a VM and got
> decent performance to the NFS based storage (90MB/s). I did all t
On Feb 28, 2013, at 5:00 AM, Andrea Ottonello wrote:
> Hallo all.
> This is my setup: CS 4.0.1, Basic zone with security groups, 2 XenServer
> hosts, switch backend mode "bridge" for both, iptables disabled for both.
> Now I setup a Ubuntu 12.04 guest, from this machine I can ping resolve DNS
>
Hallo. I found that I messed up something with network: VM has got an IP
from my real DHCP server and not from CloudStack system. So that IP was not
authorized to go out on my firewall. Thank you anyway for your help.
2013/3/4 Sebastien Goasguen
>
> On Feb 28, 2013, at 5:00 AM, Andrea Ottonello
On Mar 4, 2013, at 6:31 AM, Andrea Ottonello wrote:
> Hallo. I found that I messed up something with network: VM has got an IP
> from my real DHCP server and not from CloudStack system. So that IP was not
> authorized to go out on my firewall. Thank you anyway for your help.
>
>
Ok perfect, p
Thanks for the test plan, I have reviewed the test cases, you may proceed with
testing the feature.
Since this is moved to 4.2, can you please change the upgrade test cases from
4.1 to 4.2
Thanks
Harikrishna
On 30-Jan-2013, at 11:03 AM, Kiran Koneti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Base Image Updation facil
Hi Kirk, thanks for the reply.
We performed a wget from the SSVM, and were able to download a full 3GB iso
from an internal server. The connection was closed out and restarted twice
during the attempt.
For reference, we're using Cloudstack 4.0.0, with two CentOS 6.2 management
servers and two Xen
No issues? I am curious, are you using VMFS as your primary storage?
Francois
On 2013-03-01 8:34 PM, Jake G. wrote:
FYI, I am running CS 4.0.1 on vcenter 5.1 and esxi 5.1 and so far I have had no
issues.
Would love to see the ability to add more than one nic and more than one IP to
an instan
No I am using NFS off my NAS as both primary and secondary.
On 2013/03/05, at 0:14, Francois Gaudreault wrote:
> No issues? I am curious, are you using VMFS as your primary storage?
>
> Francois
>
> On 2013-03-01 8:34 PM, Jake G. wrote:
>> FYI, I am running CS 4.0.1 on vcenter 5.1 and esxi 5.
Thanks for the precision Jake. We are trying to use VMFS with an iSCSI
backend, and we run into weird issues using 4.0.1. In fact, we are not
able to spin any VM using templates.
We will grab the 4.1 branch, and test it :) Like I said, we will log
bugs in the BTS in the process.
Francois
On
The trickiest part is getting all the network info correct each portion of CS.
What tripped my up for the longest time was that the networks must have the
same labels as the vswitch names in vcenter.
For example
admin network has the name: admin_NW for vswitch0
In CS you must give the same nam
I've just stood up a CS 4.1-snapshot environment and I can't seem to connect to
any new instances via the "View console" in web ui. There's a popup window that
tries to connect to 172-16-8-37.realhostip.com but eventually times out.
What steps can I take to troubleshoot not being able to connect
I would love to see this as well as I am having the exact same problem.
Thank You,
Jerel
-Original Message-
From: Shane Witbeck [mailto:shane.witb...@cloudsoftcorp.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 9:54 AM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: troubleshooting console access
Hi,
I am trying to create a very simple test Cloudstack install to learn more about
Cloudstack. I have followed the install guide and created 2 hosts running
Ubuntu 12.04. I have got the management node working easily and have no
problems until I try and add the second host also running Ubuntu
Hi,
I am trying to create a very simple test Cloudstack install to learn more about
Cloudstack. I have followed the install guide and created 2 hosts running
Ubuntu 12.04. I have got the management node working easily and have no
problems until I try and add the second host also running Ubuntu
Shane/Jarel,
Can you log a defect for this?
Thanks
/sudha
-Original Message-
From: jerel.john...@thomsonreuters.com
[mailto:jerel.john...@thomsonreuters.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 8:02 AM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: troubleshooting console access
I w
Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1500
--
Shane Witbeck
On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> Shane/Jarel,
>
> Can you log a defect for this?
>
> Thanks
> /sudha
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jerel.john...@thomsonreuters.com
> [mail
Hi folks,
I have a question for traffic type that discussed as CLOUDSTACK-382 on JIRA.
ref:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
By my understanding, "storage traffic" isolation on CS means separate disk
I/O for p
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:31:12AM +0900, Go Chiba wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a question for traffic type that discussed as CLOUDSTACK-382 on JIRA.
> ref:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>
> By my unders
I believe you need to assign cloudbr0 an IP address and use that for guest
public and private interface. Cloudstack will tag and bridge public and guest
traffic accordingly, if you're using an advanced zone. Give that a try and let
us know if you get any further.
Ahmad
On Mar 4, 2013, at 1:52
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
> Using v4. I've looked at the documentation, and I also found this site that
> gave a simple walkthrough:
> http://sysadminnotebook.blogspot.com/2012/03/cloudstack-ldap.html
>
> However, I don't see the LDAP configuration option after hitting t
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 04:47:57PM +, Paul Sanders wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is it possible to fine tune user permissions within CloudStack? I know we
> have a 'user role', but I would like to remove some of the features
> (template management for example).
>
> Thanks
> ---
> Kind Regards
>
> Pau
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:02:46PM +, Paul Sanders wrote:
> Thanks Chip.
>
> So I take it a bitmap of 15 means everyone can run that command?:
>
> registerTemplate=com.cloud.api.commands.RegisterTemplateCmd;15
Exactly right.
-chip
Kirk,
The document does explain in fair amount of detail what needs to be done.
Unfortunately with CS 4 at the moment, you will only see the accepted output
once you ran the command. There is no way to retrieve the configs once they've
been entered.
Once configured, if you tail the management-
Have you looked at this guide for VSphere 5.1 and CS 4.0?
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-advanced-network-tutorial-step-by-step.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 10:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@in
URL:
http://masternode:8080/client/api?command=ldapConfig&hostname=dc1.city.domain.com&searchbase=CN%3DUsers,DC%3Dcity,DC%3Ddomain,DC%3Dcom&queryfilter=%28%26%28uid%3D%25u%29%29&binddn=%20CN%3DKirk%20Jantzer,CN%3DUsers,DC%3Dcity,DC%3domain,DC%3Dcom&bindpass=password&port=389
Response:
{ "ldapconf
Chip,
Is it means current CS not supported isolation for traffic between
hypervisor and primary storage?
And it's only supported secondary storage traffic on CS natively.
So, if we require design isolation of VM disk I/O out of CS architecture.
Is it right?
Go Chiba
Ilya,
Do you know when 4.1 and 4.2 are slated to be released? (if no hard dates,
at least which quarter/year)
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Kirk,
>
> The document does explain in fair amount of detail what needs to be done.
> Unfortunately with CS 4 at the moment, you
4.1 is about to be released, I'd say within a month or so, its going through QA
cycle now. But David/Chip/Joe and other folks can confirm.
4.2 will be out approx. 4 months from 4.1 release.
The output you've posted seems acceptable. Change the MD5HashedLogon (or
whatever it was) to false as de
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
> Ilya,
>
> Do you know when 4.1 and 4.2 are slated to be released? (if no hard dates,
> at least which quarter/year)
>
Target is end of March for 4.1
--David
Thanks for the dates, that's good to know.
I take it I should I have a user with the same login info created prior to
making this change? I changed it and was no longer able to login with the
admin account, so I changed it back.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> 4.1 is abo
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 06:30:48PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> 4.1 is about to be released, I'd say within a month or so, its going through
> QA cycle now. But David/Chip/Joe and other folks can confirm.
4.1 schedule here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+Re
In that case, if you want dual auth local and remote, you need to make few
tweaks to index page and sharedFunction.js
Please review this link, I have it working in prod.
http://markmail.org/thread/cbwtk3fub7p7yexm
Regards
ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Kirk Jantzer [mailto:kirk.jant.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:21:08AM +0900, Go Chiba wrote:
> Chip,
>
> Is it means current CS not supported isolation for traffic between
> hypervisor and primary storage?
> And it's only supported secondary storage traffic on CS natively.
> So, if we require design isolation of VM disk I/O out of
adding the users with dummy passwords worked, thank you very much guys!!
I'll be making a blog post to make this clearer to others :-)
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> In that case, if you want dual auth local and remote, you need to make few
> tweaks to index page and sha
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
> adding the users with dummy passwords worked, thank you very much guys!!
> I'll be making a blog post to make this clearer to others :-)
>
Awesome.
That said - please feel free to suggest changes to our docs,we'd
welcome bug reports.
--David
Will do. It doesn't seem to be a need for a bug report, just dumbed-down
documentation :-P
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:41 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Kirk Jantzer
> wrote:
> > adding the users with dummy passwords worked, thank you very much guys!!
> > I'll be making
I believe thats the correct template. Acton was the 3.0 release, so the
versions match up. I dont think there were any new system templates since.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Andreas Huser wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have a second question.
> In the installation manual of version 4.0 it is set th
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
> Will do. It doesn't seem to be a need for a bug report, just dumbed-down
> documentation :-P
>
If the documentation isn't comprehensive enough that you have to ask
on the mailing list for something that is already documented. That's a
bug. :)
Kirk,
If your employer is open to mentioning that they use CloudStack, please let us
know.
In my case due to legal reasons, I cant use companys logo, but I can use
companys name.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/nh7VAQ
We do need help with CS visibility,
Thanks
ilya
> -Original M
You might want to file a ticket for this Andreas, or search jira to see if
someone else filed these. it seems you have two issues right?
no more snapshots happening, and old snapshots are failing to be cleaned up.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Andreas Huser wrote:
> Hi at all,
>
> This is a
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:45:35AM -0800, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> I believe thats the correct template. Acton was the 3.0 release, so the
> versions match up. I dont think there were any new system templates since.
Correct - and the same will be true for 4.1.0-incubating.
Watch this space for upda
are you using basic or advanced zones?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:20 AM, li_fuqiong wrote:
> **
> Dear All,
> "Apache CloudStack 4.0.0-incubating CloudStack Administrator's Guide"
> tell us how to release an IP Address as follows:
>
> 1. Log in to the CloudPlatform UI as an administrator or end
thats actually one of the better errors, when specifying an ip range you
had an overlap between your desired gateway and the block you added as a
range.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Sunilreddy Kovvuri
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am able to run management server.But while configuring its sa
better error messages*
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> thats actually one of the better errors, when specifying an ip range you
> had an overlap between your desired gateway and the block you added as a
> range.
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Sunilreddy Kovvuri
CloudStack treats the system vm's as highly available but monitors and
recreates the vm's in a different way. Say a few failed starts of a ssvm,
would get cloudstack to destroy and recreate the vm on another host. Thats
my observation at least...
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Brian Furry wrot
this is odd indeed, have you tried these actions against homogenous clouds?
I wonder that to see if this can be reproduced to see if its an
environmental issue vs mixed cloud bug.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Francois Gaudreault <
fgaudrea...@cloudops.com> wrote:
> Ok, so restarting the mana
you will probably get more pointed answers on the cloudstack-dev mailing
list.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:56 PM, wuzhiqing wrote:
> Hi:
> I building the cloudstack 4.0.1 src to add vmware hypversior,than
> buliding was successd,but running ./waf rpm was faild.
>
> the following
Ahmad
You are correct, whilst the SSVM and CPVM System Offerings are not flagged as
HA, they are treated as such, and if either should fail they will be
automatically restarted on another Host, in addition, if you destroy them, they
are also automatically re-generated from the System VM Templat
Ilya - we're currently only demo'ing it; it isn't full-on production yet. I
will see what they want to do - I agree, CS needs visibility :-)
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Kirk,
>
> If your employer is open to mentioning that they use CloudStack, please
> let us know.
>
Just to confirm, you can create a Cloud with a single Zone, containing both
XenServer Clusters and VMware Clusters, but you should create unique PODs, one
for XenServer and one for VMware
Because XenServer uses LinkLocal and VMware does not, the Reserved IP Ranges
for each POD will be significa
Just to confirm, you can create a Cloud with a single Zone, containing both
XenServer Clusters and VMware Clusters, but you should create unique PODs, one
for XenServer and one for VMware
This should be documented :P (or maybe it is)
Because XenServer uses LinkLocal and VMware does not, the R
While you can do it as both Francois and Geoff have said. I can tell you
that our "Best Practice" that we implement with is that they be separate
zones to avoid as many of problems and complex configurations as possible.
Matt Mullins
CloudPlatform Implementation Engineer
Worldwide Cloud Services
Hi Chip,
You are absolutely right, configuring a Management Interface on XenServer,
using a Primary Storage CIDR, which is different to the main Management
Interface CIDR, will send traffic destined for Storage over that interface
(Bond).
We typically create the Storage Bond with XenCenter bef
Mathias
Sound advice, and certainly the safest option, but as long as you design it
correctly and know what you are doing, it works really well.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message
+1 to separate zones. thats def. the best practice we preach.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Mathias Mullins wrote:
> While you can do it as both Francois and Geoff have said. I can tell you
> that our "Best Practice" that we implement with is that they be separate
> zones to avoid as many of
> But yes, if you want to send traffic from the host to primary storage
> via a dedicated NIC, I've found that you have to implement the datastore
> on the host before telling CloudStack about it.
For the most part, yes. While in some cases you don't have to implement the
datastore you have to a
However, don't you think it breaks the concept of a "Zone" being a "Data
Center"?
To me, one could/should be able to run clusters with different
hypervisors within the same pod.
I might just be a little too picky on terms tho :P
On 2013-03-04 2:26 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
+1 to separate z
No, not really.
A Zone, is a logical segmentation of separate Infrastructure. Usually
because of the differences in Xen and ESX, you're going to find many of
those Infrastructure components different. PODs usually separate at L2
separation. Zones can separate at L3 points.
Many companies are kno
Hi,
I am trying to create a very simple test Cloudstack install to learn more about
Cloudstack. I have followed the install guide and created 2 hosts running
Ubuntu 12.04. I have got the management node working easily and have no
problems until I try and add the second host also running Ubuntu
Nick,
If you want to create a simple test - unless you are stuck on using ubuntu
- I recommend just using the XenServer 6.0.1 hypervisor. I was up and
running very quickly.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Nick Fisk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create a very simple test Cloudstack install t
Ok, but a zone should still represent a large portion of a data center.
In our case, I don't see the requirement to break into a new zone. A
new Pod would make more sense since there is no real benefit to
duplicate or add complexity to your network infrastructure because you
have 2 different h
Tim,
I may have experienced a similar issue a while back. See if you can run tcpdump
on SSVM to check for any issues and as to why this happens. I don't believe
SSVM uses wget when it puills the ISO, sniffing and analyzing the pcap file
would be better.
This is shot in the dark, check the memo
Francois,
You're right, It's a good conversation.
Is anyone saying that it's not possible to not do it at the Pod level? No
not at all, but I don't think a lot of people are convinced that that is
the right logical segmentation. First, what do you share at between the
hypervisors?
Clusters / Host
Matt,
Thanks for sharing Citrix insights about this :)
Like you said, there is no final answers for the question :P It all
comes down about pros and cons for each architecture, and the context
where the private (or public) cloud is deployed.
Thanks for the discussion and ideas :)
Francois
Hi Kirk,
You correct about changing the port number in server.xml.
Your problem is caused by the fact that cloud-management process (tomcat)
is running as the "cloud" user.
This unprivileged user can't open listening ports under 1024.
Change TOMCAT_USER in tomcat6.conf to root to confirm. Probably
It helps, thank you. Rather than changing the user to root, couldn't the
cloud user just be granted higher privileges?
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:13 PM, David Comerford wrote:
> Hi Kirk,
>
> You correct about changing the port number in server.xml.
> Your problem is caused by the fact that cloud-
Yup, I'd recommend fronting it with Apache. This is a fairly common
configuration option with Tomcat driven stuffs. You could also do some
trickery in iptables to do a PAT to direct traffic from one to the other.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:13 PM, David Comerford wrote:
> Hi Kirk,
>
> You correc
It looks like it was a memory issue on the NFS server. I started a remote
session and the server was taking a long time to respond to commands, and
all the RAM was being allocated to the cache. After a reboot I tried another
import, this time it transferred the file quickly. I checked it's resource
Hi Kirk,
Thanks for the suggestion, I will give that a go but I was really hoping to be
able to use KVM as I want to test out using Ceph as block storage.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Kirk Jantzer [mailto:kirk.jant...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 March 2013 20:08
To: Cloudstack users mailing li
Hi all,
I have been trying to set up an advanced network zone in order to have *
public* access to the VMs providing services.
I'm wondering if this is possibile only using hosts with two NICs or just
one can suffice. Moreover, is it possible to configure advanced networking
without having VLANs (
On 2/22/13 10:24 AM, "Sowmya Krishnan" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've posted a test plan for tracking the performance numbers for the set
>of List APIs which were optimized as mentioned in
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-527
>Test plan is here:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displa
one nic is sufficient to leverage cloudstacks advanced zone features.
Unfortunately VLANs are non-negotiable at the moment. If youre only using
one host in your setup, then this can still work since vlans come in to
play, primarily when your guest vm's span hosts.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM,
CloudStack 4.1 QA Scrum Meeting :
Agenda:
* Review Current Status of ACS 41 from QA Master Execution plan
* Blockers to be identified and bring up to the dev community
* Plan for next week
* Discuss process improvements for QA
Goto Meeting Invite Details :
1. Please join my meeting.
ht
Regards,
Sateesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 04 March 2013 21:12
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: VMWare 5.1 Support
>
> The trickiest part is getting all the network info correct each portion of CS.
>
> Wh
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Paul Sanders wrote:
> Thanks Chip.
>
> So I take it a bitmap of 15 means everyone can run that command?:
>
> registerTemplate=com.cloud.api.commands.RegisterTemplateCmd;15
Paul, while the above syntax is backward compatible starting 4.1
CloudStack figures the apin
78 matches
Mail list logo
