Re: [clutter] smoothstep_inc

2009-03-10 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 22:50 -0400, Vlad Seryakov wrote: What is the analog of clutter_smoothstep_inc_func in the latest Git version? there is no equivalent. the equation for the increasing variant of the smoothstep function is: f(x) = -2x^3 + 3x^2 so you probably want a cubic easing - the

Re: [clutter] smoothstep_inc

2009-03-10 Thread Vlad Seryakov
It seems kind of complicated for convenient functions. What was the reason to remove usefull functions and replace them with other usefull but not keep all? Emmanuele Bassi wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 22:50 -0400, Vlad Seryakov wrote: What is the analog of clutter_smoothstep_inc_func in the

Re: [clutter] smoothstep_inc

2009-03-10 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 11:46 -0400, Vlad Seryakov wrote: It seems kind of complicated for convenient functions. uh? the convience was all in using symbols -- and that hasn't gone away, but it has been improved (since now you can register new easing modes globally). instead of using our own

Re: [clutter] smoothstep_inc

2009-03-10 Thread Vlad Seryakov
Understood Thanks Emmanuele Bassi wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 11:46 -0400, Vlad Seryakov wrote: It seems kind of complicated for convenient functions. uh? the convience was all in using symbols -- and that hasn't gone away, but it has been improved (since now you can register new easing