Hi,
when I use a Find-module to search for a package, I get a nice error message
if the package could not be found.
If I use
find_package(Foo)
and rely on Config-mode, cmake produces an error message which doesn't help
the user:
~/src/extra-cmake-modules/example/b$ make rebuild_cache
Running
On 2/16/2012 6:32 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Done, and pushed to stage.
I added the prefix cmake_ to the function, and added a test for it.
Looks good, thanks.
However now that I look at the end result I realize that the functionality
is not specific to CMAKE_REQUIRED_LIBRARIES at all. It
On Thursday 16 February 2012, Brad King wrote:
On 2/16/2012 6:32 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Done, and pushed to stage.
I added the prefix cmake_ to the function, and added a test for it.
Looks good, thanks.
However now that I look at the end result I realize that the functionality
On 2/16/2012 8:19 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Comments, objections ?
The entire point of find_package's interface is that the caller
does not need to care how the package is found, and the actual
method used for the find can change under the hood.
Ideally every package would provide a
On 2/16/2012 10:15 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2012, Brad King wrote:
In hindsight that name was poorly chosen. I'd really like to see package
in the name because they are package configuration files. Otherwise
there is no indication it has anything to do with
On Thursday 16 February 2012, Brad King wrote:
On 2/16/2012 8:19 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Comments, objections ?
The entire point of find_package's interface is that the caller
does not need to care how the package is found, and the actual
method used for the find can change under the
On Thursday 16 February 2012, Brad King wrote:
On 2/16/2012 10:15 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2012, Brad King wrote:
In hindsight that name was poorly chosen. I'd really like to see
package in the name because they are package configuration files.
Otherwise
On 2/16/2012 10:48 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
5) configure_package_config_file() + write_basic_package_version_file()
So, 5) ?
Looks good. Thanks.
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please
On 2/16/2012 10:30 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
In any of the above modes the error message can be more explicit.
It is up to the author of the project to choose to do this. I do
not want it to be required.
Here we disagree. I think it should be required, to avoid the impression
finding
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 2/16/2012 10:48 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
5) configure_package_config_file(**) + write_basic_package_version_**
file()
So, 5) ?
Looks good. Thanks.
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other
Hi,
just FYI some input on what people would like to have when cross compiling.
Like uploading executables to the target in try_run(), installing to a target
using something like scp, etc.
Alex
-- Forwarded Message --
Date: Thursday 16 February 2012, 14:32:21
From: Thomas
Pushed down the queue again... I'll get to it soon. There are a handful of
minor changes that I still need to make first.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
David Cole wrote:
Excellent : thanks very much for trying it out. I'll try to get this
first
On 2/16/2012 1:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Actually I expected I would prefer this over the fixed names, but now that
I've done it and look at what Config.cmake.in file I have to write, I think I
liked the previous version with the fixed names (CONFIG_HELPER) better. I
think it was easier
On 16.02.2012 04:51, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 2/15/2012 5:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
In summary:
- use the CMakeLists.txt from
https://github.com/syntheticpp/ninja/tree/cmake
- on Windows use ninja from
https://github.com/syntheticpp/ninja/tree/token-splitter
and wait and see
On 2/16/2012 3:29 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
What are you targeting?
install-time i.e. make install usage?
package install time prodduced with cpack usage?
package install time NOT produced with cpack usage?
a subset of this?
The goal is a FooConfig.cmake file for make install time but
that
On 2/16/2012 2:57 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
They are not interested.
There is another patch in the pipeline but with
this the current generator doesn't work.
Use the official ninja and drop Win atm.
Bummer. I am most interested in windows. Would love to stop using
gmake... Seems like they
2012/2/16 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com:
On 2/16/2012 3:29 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
What are you targeting?
install-time i.e. make install usage?
package install time prodduced with cpack usage?
package install time NOT produced with cpack usage?
a subset of this?
The goal is a
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/2/16 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com:
On 2/16/2012 3:29 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
What are you targeting?
install-time i.e. make install usage?
package install time prodduced with cpack usage?
package
On 2/16/2012 4:13 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com
mailto:eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not convinced, yet I'll have to try with the example provided by Alex
by adding proper CPack usage in it.
Currently I see in
On 16.02.2012 21:38, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 2/16/2012 2:57 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
They are not interested.
There is another patch in the pipeline but with
this the current generator doesn't work.
Use the official ninja and drop Win atm.
Bummer. I am most interested in windows. Would love
What are we trying to accomplish here?
I have set up 3 of my machines (1 each MacOSX, FreeBSD, and Linux --- like my
housekeeper, I don't do Windows) to submit nightly builds using the Ninja
generator. That will test the impact of changes in the generator.
But it appears that we may also need
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Richard Wackerbarth rich...@nfsnet.orgwrote:
What are we trying to accomplish here?
2 things:
(1) Keep the CMake ninja generator working with the changing state of the
CMake code base (primary)
(2) Understanding what version of ninja works good on all the
On 2/16/2012 5:19 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Richard Wackerbarth rich...@nfsnet.org
mailto:rich...@nfsnet.org wrote:
What are we trying to accomplish here?
2 things:
(1) Keep the CMake ninja generator working with the changing state of
the CMake code base
Hi there,
One of the macros we have in KDE creates shell scripts to initialize
environment variables needed on various platforms so that tests can be run
before installation. If RPATH is enabled, the scripts are not needed, but
RPATH is sometimes disabled, so the scripts are the solution to
On Thursday 16 February 2012, Brad King wrote:
On 2/16/2012 1:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Actually I expected I would prefer this over the fixed names, but now
that I've done it and look at what Config.cmake.in file I have to write,
I think I liked the previous version with the fixed
Hi there,
Also in this thread one of the discussion topics was making CMake default to
creating Gui-ready executables. That is, setting the WIN32_EXECUTABLE or
MACOSX_BUNDLE property on the executable target.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsystem/6961/focus=7005
By
2012/2/16 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com:
On 2/16/2012 4:13 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com
mailto:eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not convinced, yet I'll have to try with the example provided by
Alex
by adding proper CPack
Hello again,
A short question about your proposal :
Michael Hertling wrote
(4) DIM_USE_STATIC decides if DIM_LIBRARIES receives DIM_STATIC_LIBRARY
or DIM_SHARED_LIBRARY, and because DIM_LIBRARIES is not cached, it
can be set anew each time FIND_PACKAGE(DIM ...) is called, so the
Hi again,
I have understood what you meant :)
For records here is what I did :
Thank you again for your supprot,
Best regards,
Barth
--
View this message in context:
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/How-to-have-a-static-shared-option-in-a-Find-script-tp7287655p7291050.html
Sent from the
Hi again,
I have understood what you meant :)
For records here is what I did :
# (1) Use FIND_LIBRARY() to look for the shared and the static library
# and define DIM_SHARED_LIBRARY and DIM_STATIC_LIBRARY in the cache.
find_library(DIM_STATIC_LIBRARY NAMES libdim.a PATHS $ENV{DIMDIR}
On 02/16/2012 03:14 PM, Barth wrote:
Hi again,
I have understood what you meant :)
Hhm, actually, I talked nonsense w.r.t. DIM_USE_STATIC. ;)
For records here is what I did :
# (1) Use FIND_LIBRARY() to look for the shared and the static library
# and define DIM_SHARED_LIBRARY and
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Hashim Mir h...@rim.com wrote:
Hi,
This is what I am doing presently in order to compile both a 32-bit and a
64-bit version of my project:
cmake.exe -G “Visual Studio 9 2008” #for x32
cmake.exe -G “Visual Studio 9 2008 Win64” #for x64
Is
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Hashim Mir h...@rim.com wrote:
Hi,
This is what I am doing presently in order to compile both a 32-bit and a
64-bit version of my project:
cmake.exe -G “Visual Studio 9 2008”
Hello,I am trying to use CMake with codeblocks on windows, I created a simple project in the folder pCMakewhen I use the CMake interface I got the message:CMake Error: CMake was unable to find a build program corresponding to "MinGW Makefiles". CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM is not set. You probably need
I have an application where I want to link some targets against shared
versions of Boost and some against static versions.
(I'd prefer shared in general, but I need to link against the static
version of boost for my matlab mex interface, to avoid loading the
different version of boost shipped by
My team has been using precompiled headers under CMake and Visual Studio 2008
for quite a while. Now we've switched to VS 2010, the cmake code we used to
support precompiled headers is no longer working.
The following is the code in question and we're just using
set_source_files_properties
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:39 PM, david_bjorn...@agilent.com wrote:
My team has been using precompiled headers under CMake and Visual Studio
2008 for quite a while. Now we’ve switched to VS 2010, the cmake code we
used to support precompiled headers is no longer working.
The following is
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 29fe3cbd7d5cb34465203abd4e27dcbe12103bd2 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via d8d31a644abde62197ba3dad669420e87339a924 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via f08963bf9baf9312ec01ecb8f4eb57486c27083f (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via ffdef8726313f88bcfc534f37a989db8c5b93c47 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via d03606a19cc05872baf23269ae8ec61d2e0719e8 (commit)
from
42 matches
Mail list logo
