Re: [cmake-developers] Safe source list GLOBs

2013-05-15 Thread Wojciech Knapik
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote: Globs simply do not work well for source files. GLOBs work great for source files. Just not with CMake currently ;] I don't think this will be come a module in CMake. To have this work in a generic way, you would have to run

Re: [cmake-developers] Safe source list GLOBs

2013-05-15 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 5/15/2013 4:48 AM, Wojciech Knapik wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote: Globs simply do not work well for source files. GLOBs work great for source files. Just not with CMake currently ;] No it does not. It is sloppy IMO. It will pick up junk files.

Re: [cmake-developers] Need some pointers on learning the code

2013-05-15 Thread Brad King
On 05/14/2013 05:42 PM, Robert Dailey wrote: What target property does TARGET_FILE_DIR access when used in a generator expression? I'm thinking I might be able to set the output directory directly to the custom target for each configuration. If I know which target property to set, this might

Re: [cmake-developers] Safe source list GLOBs

2013-05-15 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 15 May 2013, Bill Hoffman wrote: On 5/15/2013 4:48 AM, Wojciech Knapik wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote: Globs simply do not work well for source files. GLOBs work great for source files. Just not with CMake currently ;] No it does not.

Re: [cmake-developers] Handling the NCurses fragmentation [yet another topic on this issue]

2013-05-15 Thread Brad King
On 05/13/2013 05:15 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: There is an old known problem with the NCurses library: missing links against ncursesw, and additionally ncursest with ncurseswt [1]. There is a bug report [2] marked as a backlog I've cross-linked that issue back to this thread:

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014143]: FindJNI cannot find JDK installed

2013-05-15 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14143 == Reported By:vitaut Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] Announcing CMake Tools for Visual Studio

2013-05-15 Thread Klaim - Joël Lamotte
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:04 AM, David Golub golu...@gmail.com wrote: I’m pleased to announce the first release candidate of CMake Tools for Visual Studio, an extension adding support for syntax highlighting and IntelliSense in CMake code using Microsoft Visual Studio. The extension is open

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] Announcing CMake Tools for Visual Studio

2013-05-15 Thread J Decker
Yup; painless to install, works as described :) Thanx On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Klaim - Joël Lamotte mjkl...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:04 AM, David Golub golu...@gmail.com wrote: I’m pleased to announce the first release candidate of CMake Tools for Visual Studio,

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014145]: CMake generated solutions don't build projects in parallel.

2013-05-15 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14145 == Reported By:Ho Cheung Assigned To:

Re: [CMake] Compiling Fortran Modules And

2013-05-15 Thread Yngve Inntjore Levinsen
Den 13. mai 2013 20:08, skrev Pritchett-Sheats, Lori: Each dir* has *.F files that must be preprocessed to *.f90 files and then compiled. Hi, Just to give my two cents here. The standard filenaming scheme for fortran files are unless otherwise specified in the compile/preprocessing flags (as

Re: [CMake] cmake : error : 'AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW' undeclared

2013-05-15 Thread allan George
File in which error comes are , archieve_read_disk_posix.c archieve_write_disk_posix.c :-- These files have following include file :--- #ifdef HAVE_FCNTL_H #include fcntl.h #endif Now if we see the dependencies :--- /usr/include/fcntl.h -contains file --- # include

Re: [CMake] Compiling Fortran Modules And

2013-05-15 Thread Pritchett-Sheats, Lori
Thank you! That fixed it. And yes, I had a typo. should have been F90Library_SOURCE_FILES. Lori A. Pritchett-Sheats Los Alamos National Laboratory CCS-2, Computational Physics 505-665-6675 From: Brad King [brad.k...@kitware.com] Sent: Tuesday, May

Re: [CMake] Compiling Fortran Modules And

2013-05-15 Thread Pritchett-Sheats, Lori
Yes the files are not following the file extension standards. This is a legacy project from the late 1990s, early 2000s. I did change the file extensions to *.F90 to work around my current problem to move forward with other tasks and I discovered that while ifort pre-processed files the code

Re: [CMake] CMAKE_C_FLAGS and CMAKE_C_COMPILER cross compilation woe

2013-05-15 Thread Thomas Taranowski
Thanks for the response Andreas. For those poor souls who come after, the solution is to do the following: set(CMAKE_C_FLAGS -mmcu=msp430fr5739 -D__MSP430FR5739__ -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -DGCC_MSP430 -Wall -g -std=c99 CACHE STRING FORCE) Using the FORCE attribute forces the

Re: [CMake] Save stripped debugging information

2013-05-15 Thread Ian Monroe
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Lukas Anzinger l.anzin...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I'm aware of the option CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE with which I can tell if I want to include debugging information or not. A very useful feature of the program objcopy is, to not strip debugging information from a file

[CMake] Fortran Module dependency inside a preprocessor conditional

2013-05-15 Thread Mark Cianciosa
I have a fortran code that I'm compiling twice to generate two libraries. There is a USE statement inside a preprocessor conditional. It looks like cmake is not picking up the dependency because of it. The code in question is SUBROUTINE calc_fbal(bsubu, bsubv) ... USE

Re: [CMake] Fortran Module dependency inside a preprocessor conditional

2013-05-15 Thread Brad King
On 05/15/2013 04:10 PM, Mark Cianciosa wrote: I have a fortran code that I'm compiling twice to generate two libraries. There is a USE statement inside a preprocessor conditional. It looks like cmake is not picking up the dependency because of it. The code in question is SUBROUTINE

Re: [CMake] Announcing CMake Tools for Visual Studio

2013-05-15 Thread Klaim - Joël Lamotte
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:04 AM, David Golub golu...@gmail.com wrote: I’m pleased to announce the first release candidate of CMake Tools for Visual Studio, an extension adding support for syntax highlighting and IntelliSense in CMake code using Microsoft Visual Studio. The extension is open

[CMake] Some ctest question

2013-05-15 Thread Leek, Jim
I'm new to cmake, a few weeks ago I decided to convert a complex and decrepit old build system to cmake. It has gone very well, I'm quite impressed. So, now I want to add testing support, but I haven't been able to figure out a few things. 1. What to do with testing input files? I wrote

Re: [CMake] [cmake-developers] Announcing CMake Tools for Visual Studio

2013-05-15 Thread J Decker
Yup; painless to install, works as described :) Thanx On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Klaim - Joël Lamotte mjkl...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:04 AM, David Golub golu...@gmail.com wrote: I’m pleased to announce the first release candidate of CMake Tools for Visual Studio,

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.10.2-2971-gb11ed88

2013-05-15 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via b11ed88a3f11d0e6d1325f44a8bfdbf67e3b83a9 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.10.2-2973-g925eb83

2013-05-15 Thread Stephen Kelly
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 925eb83c383e5734ced262c3df8ba3b31b80ff53 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.10.2-2981-g143def6

2013-05-15 Thread Stephen Kelly
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 143def6e9a77c4854e19870b513e0f473b514647 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.10.2-2983-gbfc9dea

2013-05-15 Thread Stephen Kelly
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via bfc9deae93a58e82ceb92706b1428a7f85fd1165 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v2.8.10.2-1040-g0ad0c37

2013-05-15 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, master has been updated via 0ad0c37206fce114c4e4c31f5270b53e181ab3c2 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.10.2-2993-g06f8701

2013-05-15 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 06f8701788cffce1d8abc5013a8b7483e2c2367f (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.11-1955-g4527d76

2013-05-15 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 4527d76a7f0ab32810e6cf0ff0143d37a8044804 (commit) via