We lack information on how your test are failing. If they all timeout then
may be you should setup a proper timeout for the test. The actual execution
speed of a test may depend on the load of your machine or the network
(depending on what the test are actually doing).
This may be even more
_VERSION_MINOR 8)
-set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20170517)
+set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20170518)
#set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1)
---
Summary of changes:
Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
hooks/
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:55 AM, Patrick Boettcher
> My reason of preferring pkg-config is
because it may have all
>> other kind of stuff in it that the maintainer thought is necessary.
>> I'd imagine some .pc files export a boatload of flags for all 3
>> stages, and I
I remember that the longest tests used to run first. Now they seem to
run in a random order on Windows, Mac, Linux.
Is this the expected behavior? How can I get longest test first?
Regards,
Juan
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
No you would set the properties on ExeA and ExeB and that would effect the
target_link_library generation for the interface library I
I have written an example that drops the Foo libraries as they aren't
needed to show my example.
The way I know how to do this is to add it last at the bottom of the
top-level CMakeLists.txt file, and then use add_dependencies to make
it depend on all other targets. (Or at least all other "leaf" targets,
which further depend on others, ... the sum of which is "all other
targets" besides the
Not sure if I understand that correctly, but isn't that essential the same as
creating a FooA and BarA that link to IA, and a FooB and BarB that link to IB,
and linking ExeA to FooA and ExeB to FooB?
Problem with this approach is that there are more than two implementations of
I, and way more
Hi,
I wonder what is the reason that sometimes ctest ends with numerous ‘Failed’
and ‘Timeout’, which ‘ctest –rerun-failed’ reports ‘Passed’. At times the
number of these false failures is about one third. I guess that the problem is
in the way I set my tests, but I have no clue where to
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 2e6cbd987119f74fe3454213a73ef049bd1b0926 (commit)
via
I have a feeling that you could do this with generator expressions. You
would have the interface link line for I have a generator expression that
switches between IA and IB. Than you would setup ExeA and ExeB to trigger
this switch. Maybe using something like $?
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:28 AM,
I have a custom target that must meet the following requirements:
* It must always run, regardless of what subset of other targets are being built
* It must always be the very last thing run. In parallelized builds,
it must wait until all other targets are done building before
starting, so that
Volker Enderlein wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, that helps. With there is maybe something to learn from the CMake
sources, too.
R.
> Hello,
>
> according to https://sourceforge.net/p/predef/wiki/Compilers/ you could
> check with
>
> check_cxx_source_compiles("
> #if defined (_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER
Hi, and thanks for the quick reaction :-)
The approach with forward declaration looks interesting. However, I don't think
that it will resolve all the problems.
One issue is that there are multiple apps, each using separate implementations.
• ExeA uses the generic libraries Foo and Bar, as well
Hello,
according to https://sourceforge.net/p/predef/wiki/Compilers/ you could
check with
check_cxx_source_compiles("
#if defined (_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER == 1900) && (_MSC_FULL_VER ==
190024210)
#else
#error compiler is not MSVC Update3
#endif
int main() {
On Tue, 16 May 2017 12:32:11 -0700
Pawel Veselov wrote:
> > I was once in a situation where I could have used pkg-config with a
> > custom path to have pkg-config look for the .pc-file. I then
> > switched to find_library with the custom-path slightly adapted and
> > it
René J.V. Bertin wrote:
Bump. No one who can help here?
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please
16 matches
Mail list logo