On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 05/16/2011 12:37 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 05/14/2011 01:04 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Any news on this one? We're currently building more tools
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 05/14/2011 01:04 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Any news on this one? We're currently building more tools, so it would
be cool to know when we can expect this to be more easily available.
If there's more work to do on my side
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Oliver Buchtala oliver.bucht...@jku.at wrote:
Hi Alex, Manuel, and other interested watchers,
I'd like to introduce a preview version of an Eclipse plugin
'CMakeWorkbench' which is combined with the CMake CDT7 generator
developed lately.
I try to reduce user
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Manuel Klimek kli...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Oliver Buchtala oliver.bucht...@jku.at
wrote:
Hi Alex, Manuel, and other interested watchers,
I'd like to introduce a preview version of an Eclipse plugin
'CMakeWorkbench' which
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday 28 April 2011, Oliver Buchtala wrote:
...
wst-file is allright and I see that all projects are generated :)
Unfortunately, this working set stuff is yet a bit inconvenient, as it
is not an Eclipse
Pulling in a few more people (suggested audience from Sergey), please
tell me if I'm CC'ing a list that doesn't make sense.
Context:
Oliver is currently working on making eclipse support for CMake a lot
better. I heard that Andrew is working on configuration of includes
and defines in eclipse, so
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 12:13 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 08:33 AM, Brad King wrote:
On 04/04/2011 12:01 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Done.
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/25/2011 11:54 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Is just putting IF(UNIX) ... around all the stuff enough for that?
It's not just the test. The C++ implementation cannot handle all
generators. It should be taught to run
For your convenience, rebased onto current head and git format-patch'ed.
Cheers,
/Manuel
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Manuel Klimek kli...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/04/2011 12:01 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Done.
Thanks
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 08:33 AM, Brad King wrote:
On 04/04/2011 12:01 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Done.
Thanks!
While running the test on more platforms I ran into a problem. On
Windows makefile tools like Borland and NMake we use
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/04/2011 12:01 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Done.
Thanks!
I also have the previous patches ready (re-based with master). Let me
know how we'll go on about submitting all that.
I still have them on a local topic branch
20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 1/19/2011 9:07 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
So the question is: do you want to run this test as part of the
dashboard clients?
Yes, we do. Please implement the test in C++ using the hints I
sent previously.
Thanks,
-Brad
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:08 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 1/18/2011 1:50 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Since this is a big integration style test, is it also possible to
integrate a python test
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 01/14/2011 06:19 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Attached are 2 patches for caching the definesflags and introducing
the options.
Thanks.
I'll look into testing next, any hints for what to look out for would
be appreciated
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 01/14/2011 01:28 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
I'm fine with making it optional. Another option would be to make it
hidden, as we want tools and not users to interact with it. Your call.
Actually, with an option
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Brad King brad.k...@www.kitware.com wrote:
On 01/12/2011 11:47 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Split up the patch - apparently I need ssh access to push the topic
stuff, so I'm just attaching the patches.
Thanks. That's pretty clean. In the final version
)
that you might want to run during a build, too.
On 1/11/2011 5:10 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
I thought about that, too. On the other hand, we might also want to
make that information available from other generators where it makes
sense - in my mind it is somewhat orthogonal to the generator
Hi,
we're working on C++ tools based on clang to get the power of
automated refactoring and analysis that Java has known for years to
C++ developers.
With the attached patch I include a proposal for how we could export
the compile command line for C/C++ files from cmake for Unix makefile
Hi,
have you tried using ${QT_INCLUDE_DIR} and QtGui/QApplication?
Manuel
On Nov 16, 2007 8:37 PM, Stephen Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a top level CMakeList.txt file containing:
FIND_PACKAGE(Qt4 REQUIRED)
.
.
INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES(${QT_QTCORE_INCLUDE_DIR})
Funny,
for a lng time nothing happens, and now three people
are working on one :-) I'm, too, mainly to learn how to TDD
a GUI, so I have a different goal, perhaps I'll just go on to see
how a TDD program differs from a traditionally coded one,
see http://sourceforge.net/projects/qcmake if
Hi,
I'm planning to do a test-driven implementation of qcmake (see
http://sourceforge.net/projects/qcmake), which is intended as a
replacement for the CMakeSetup (mostly because VC Express
doesn't support MFC, and to learn TDDing GUI apps).
If you could choose, what would you do differently than
On 8/30/07, Torsten Martinsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I, too, use Emacs. However, do not be oblivious to the fact that an
nmake build can take around five times longer than an IDE build.
why do you use nmake and not msbuild if you do a command
line build? msbuild uses the same mechanism the
Well, if you're just interested in having one solution that only
covers the currently needed libraries from the rest of the source
tree, you can have a look at this feature request:
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=3218
if you have
lib/
a/
b/
c/
exec/
x/
y/
and you do a PROJECT(x)
Hi,
So the concern is that the process will take too long. Our code base
clocks
in to at least 500,000 lines of code with many different projects. I know
KDE has successfully moved to cmake for the kdelibs so I was hoping to get
some feedback on how much time it takes cmake to generate the
Hi,
what about an install-recursive target. We 'injected'
such a target manually in our autotools-based environment,
and while it's probably possible to generate such
a target manually in cmake, too (using macros), it would
be a nice default-feature.
Idea: if you're somewhere in the build tree,
a better way to distinguish between generated and real CPPs.
Cheers,
Laurentiu
At 06:44 AM 5/17/2006, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Hi there,
I've got a problem with SOURCE_GROUPS with cmake 2.4.1 in windows (VC
2005).
I already found out that if I want to add headers in a source
group I'll have to add
be to rename all x_inc.cpp to x.inl. Usually inl
files are ignored by the VS compiler (they're marked as headers), and
you have a better way to distinguish between generated and real CPPs.
Cheers,
Laurentiu
At 06:44 AM 5/17/2006, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Hi there,
I've got a problem with SOURCE_GROUPS
At 06:44 AM 5/17/2006, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Hi there,
I've got a problem with SOURCE_GROUPS with cmake 2.4.1 in windows (VC
2005).
I already found out that if I want to add headers in a source
group I'll have to add the headers to the ADD_LIBRARY or
ADD_EXECUTABLE.
But I have the problem that I
Hi,
A little feature request. I don't know if this is
allready possible, therefor I post to the list first.
Should I file a feature request?
It would be nice to have an option to
automatically include all vs project files
to a solution if a target depends on any
target in the project file,
:
# cd projects/x
# make
to build only x
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 16:20, Bill Hoffman wrote:
You should be using the SUBDIRS or ADD_SUBDIRECTORY command.
The external msproject is for including a project NOT configured
by cmake into a cmake project tree.
At 08:13 AM 4/26/2006, Manuel Klimek
30 matches
Mail list logo
