2010/8/23 Clinton Stimpson :
> On 08/22/2010 10:47 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
>>
>> 2010/8/22 Eric Noulard:
>>
>>>
>>> 2010/8/21 Clinton Stimpson:
>>>
I wondered if one would typically use groups if their project contained
sub projects, and the sub projects had different conventions for
On Monday 23 Aug 2010 7:57:28 pm Clinton Stimpson wrote:
> On 08/22/2010 10:47 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
> > 2010/8/22 Eric Noulard:
> >> 2010/8/21 Clinton Stimpson:
> >>> I wondered if one would typically use groups if their project contained
> >>> sub projects, and the sub projects had different co
On 08/22/2010 10:47 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/22 Eric Noulard:
2010/8/21 Clinton Stimpson:
I wondered if one would typically use groups if their project contained sub
projects, and the sub projects had different conventions for the component
names.
I do not usually wor
On Sunday 22 August 2010, Eric Noulard wrote:
...
> CPack is not aware **AT ALL** of subprojects :-(
>
> It's even worse, since CPack is not meant to be included more than once
> in the same tree.
> In fact you already know that because you are the reporter of this:
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/
2010/8/22 Eric Noulard :
> 2010/8/21 Clinton Stimpson :
>>
>> I wondered if one would typically use groups if their project contained sub
>> projects, and the sub projects had different conventions for the component
>> names.
>
> I do not usually work with sub-project and I must admit I don't eve
2010/8/22 Eric Noulard :
> 2010/8/22 Rolf Eike Beer :
>> Am Saturday 21 August 2010 schrieb Eric Noulard:
>>
>>> They change the number and the contents of the generated packages:
>>> 3.a) CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_GROUPS_IN_ONE_PACKAGE=1
>>> means you want to get a single package whose co
2010/8/21 Clinton Stimpson :
>
> I wondered if one would typically use groups if their project contained sub
> projects, and the sub projects had different conventions for the component
> names.
I do not usually work with sub-project and I must admit I don't even know
how CPack behave for projec
2010/8/22 Rolf Eike Beer :
> Am Saturday 21 August 2010 schrieb Eric Noulard:
>
>> They change the number and the contents of the generated packages:
>> 3.a) CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_GROUPS_IN_ONE_PACKAGE=1
>> means you want to get a single package whose content
>> is the merge
Am Saturday 21 August 2010 schrieb Eric Noulard:
> They change the number and the contents of the generated packages:
> 3.a) CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_GROUPS_IN_ONE_PACKAGE=1
> means you want to get a single package whose content
> is the merge of all components GROUPS
>
>
On Aug 21, 2010, at 6:21 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
> 2010/8/21 Eric Noulard :
> [...]
>> They change the number and the contents of the generated packages:
>>3.a) CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_GROUPS_IN_ONE_PACKAGE=1
>> means you want to get a single package whose content
>> is the mer
2010/8/21 Eric Noulard :
[...]
> They change the number and the contents of the generated packages:
> 3.a) CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_GROUPS_IN_ONE_PACKAGE=1
> means you want to get a single package whose content
> is the merge of all components GROUPS
>
> 3.b) CPACK_COMPONENTS_AL
Hi All,
I finally rebased my previous work on component support for Archive Generators
(i.e. STGZ TBZ2 TGZ TZZIP)
(see also ML discussions:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-July/038575.html
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-August/038663.html
http://www.cmake.org/pi
On 8/11/10 5:39 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
> 2010/8/11 Thawan Kooburat :
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I read though this thread and also two bug reports related to this issue.
>>
>> It seems like it will take a while because of CPack design issue. Do
>> you think there will be any workaround or small hack to m
2010/8/11 Thawan Kooburat :
> Hi Eric,
>
> I read though this thread and also two bug reports related to this issue.
>
> It seems like it will take a while because of CPack design issue. Do
> you think there will be any workaround or small hack to make this work
> with current CPackRPM?
I think it
Hi Eric,
I read though this thread and also two bug reports related to this issue.
It seems like it will take a while because of CPack design issue. Do
you think there will be any workaround or small hack to make this work
with current CPackRPM?
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Chris Wolf wrot
On 8/9/10 2:22 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
> 2010/8/9 Chris Wolf :
>>
>>
>> On 8/9/10 12:11 PM, Kishore wrote:
>>> On Friday 06 Aug 2010 4:18:36 am Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/4 Kishore :
> On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I did add a patch for
2010/8/9 Chris Wolf :
>
>
> On 8/9/10 12:11 PM, Kishore wrote:
>> On Friday 06 Aug 2010 4:18:36 am Eric Noulard wrote:
>>> 2010/8/4 Kishore :
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I did add a patch for the "multiple file problem"
> http://public.kit
On 8/9/10 12:11 PM, Kishore wrote:
> On Friday 06 Aug 2010 4:18:36 am Eric Noulard wrote:
>> 2010/8/4 Kishore :
>>> On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
Hi All,
I did add a patch for the "multiple file problem"
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
>>
On Friday 06 Aug 2010 4:18:36 am Eric Noulard wrote:
> 2010/8/4 Kishore :
> > On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I did add a patch for the "multiple file problem"
> >> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
> >>
> >> May be interested people can h
2010/8/4 Kishore :
> On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I did add a patch for the "multiple file problem"
>> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
>>
>> May be interested people can have a try and comment
>> this patch.
>>
>> It adds the possibility for
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I did add a patch for the "multiple file problem"
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
>
> May be interested people can have a try and comment
> this patch.
>
> It adds the possibility for any CPack generators to ge
2010/8/2 Eric Noulard :
> Hi All,
>
> I did add a patch for the "multiple file problem"
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
>
> May be interested people can have a try and comment
> this patch.
>
> It adds the possibility for any CPack generators to generate multiple file.
> It adds
Hi All,
I did add a patch for the "multiple file problem"
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
May be interested people can have a try and comment
this patch.
It adds the possibility for any CPack generators to generate multiple file.
It adds "preliminary" support for component to al
On Friday 30 Jul 2010 5:05:56 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'll try to launch a specific thread for this following what
>
> Kishore said:
> > I would like to see full support for multiple components in cpack.
>
> David answered:
> > Could you elaborate on "full support for multiple componen
On 7/30/10 6:35 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
Hi All,
I'll try to launch a specific thread for this following what
Kishore said:
I would like to see full support for multiple components in cpack.
David answered:
Could you elaborate on "full support for multiple components in cpack" either
in anot
Hi All,
I'll try to launch a specific thread for this following what
Kishore said:
> I would like to see full support for multiple components in cpack.
David answered:
> Could you elaborate on "full support for multiple components in cpack" either
> in another thread,
> or in a feature request b
26 matches
Mail list logo
