Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 9/13/07, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For dynamic code (in C/C++/obj-c/fortran/anythign with C linkage) you
must use -fPIC or variant thereof because otherwise your jump labels
will be too small and linking will fail sometimes
I have not yet contributed to the wiki or anything to CMake yet so I
might not be in position to give advice, but if I look at the main
page for CMake on the wiki I can see a page named Platform Dependent
Issues. I don't think the faq is a good place for platform specific
stuff or stuff which work
The FAQ doesn't mention the trick for loading a shared library from a
static one. They therefore think their objects have to be compiled
twice, even when they are using -fPIC on gcc and want the same compiler
flags.
http://www.mail-archive.com/cmake@cmake.org/msg01890.html
Could this be
On 9/13/07, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FAQ doesn't mention the trick for loading a shared library from a
static one. They therefore think their objects have to be compiled
twice, even when they are using -fPIC on gcc and want the same compiler
flags.
Hello Brandon,
This is the way they are choosing to do this in our organization. We
only build for gcc on Linux. If we built for multiple platforms, we
could have platform specific conditional statements, as in the
hyperlinked example I have provided.
In deference to elegance, the project will
Juan,
I find that very useful. Thanks!
Justin
On Thursday 13 September 2007 12:44:07 Juan Sanchez wrote:
Here is my update to the FAQ:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#That_means_I_have_to_build_all_my_libra
ry_objects_twice.2C_once_for_shared_and_once_for_static.__I_don.27t_like_tha
Brandon,
Calm down. I found Juan's documentation quite useful.
What is the point of having a Wiki if not to document such things? Anyone can
figure out basic CMake usage from CMake docs. This is beyond the scope of
CMake docs; therefore, it belongs on the Wiki.
For the record, my projects
On 9/13/07, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Brandon,
This is the way they are choosing to do this in our organization. We
only build for gcc on Linux. If we built for multiple platforms, we
could have platform specific conditional statements, as in the
hyperlinked example I
Hello Brandon,
At the end of the day. The question I answered was frequently asked on
the mailing list (according to google), and inaccurately answered in the
FAQ.
This issue is a concern for many people, and at least one other person
found it helpful.
While beyond my capabilities, I think a
On 9/13/07, KSpam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon,
I will be happy to see your submission come to fruition. If and until that
happens, it is nice to have another option.
My solution worked in production reality in the Chicken build system
since sometime at the beginning of the year. That's
Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 9/13/07, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The statement in the FAQ is untrue:
That means I have to build all my library objects twice, once for shared
and once for static. I don't like that!
This statement may also be a dealbreaker for
On 9/13/07, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For dynamic code (in C/C++/obj-c/fortran/anythign with C linkage) you
must use -fPIC or variant thereof because otherwise your jump labels
will be too small and linking will fail sometimes on x86, nearly
always on amd64, ppc, always on
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:23:43 -0800
Von: Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: cmake cmake@cmake.org
CC:
Betreff: Re: [CMake] FAQ update for renaming a library
Mike Jackson wrote:
What I would do is put the _preferred way_ at the top then towards
I am questioning the relevance or clarity of this FAQ entry:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_do_I_rename_a_library_that_has_already_been_built.3F
This looks like some kind of historical hack-around. I don't think we
want to be telling people to rename libraries. Rather, we should be
What I would do is put the _preferred way_ at the top then towards
the bottom put the previous way. I am sure I can come up with some
obscure reason why I might want to do it the old way and not more
preferred way. Options are good.
--
Mike Jackson
imikejackson gmail * com
On Mar 2,
On 2007-03-02 10:03-0800 Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
I am questioning the relevance or clarity of this FAQ entry:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_do_I_rename_a_library_that_has_already_been_built.3F
This looks like some kind of historical hack-around. I don't think we want
to be
16 matches
Mail list logo
