Hello,
I meet some problems to run cmake with intel fortran 11.1 + visual 2008 under
windows XP 64 bits.
I can compile a fortran project under visual, but cmake is not able to detect
ifort (I run cmake from the visual dos console).
The log of a cmake run is joined to this mail.
I wanted to
Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
How many CMake commands can work with subexpressions in regular expressions?
Are any extensions needed in this application area?
Regards,
Markus
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
Is the command variant string(REGEX REPLACE ...) completely documented?
Can multiple variables be specified that will receive the data from the
evaluation of subexpressions in the passed regular expression?
Regards,
Markus
Thank you for your kind reply Michael, it got me some bit further and I
think I understand a bit more. I could not see any examples of the usage
of the BundleUtilities in CMake, but the example given in the Wiki works
as expected on my machine.
I forgot to add some significant parts of my
get_directory_property(info COMPILE_DEFINITIONS)
How do you think about an extension for this programming interface?
Would you like to support that target parameters like preprocessor symbols are
queried from the build environment even if they were not set by the CMake
command
On 01/20/2011 12:10 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
Is the command variant string(REGEX REPLACE ...) completely documented?
Can multiple variables be specified that will receive the data from the
evaluation of subexpressions in the passed regular
On 01/20/2011 01:30 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
get_directory_property(info COMPILE_DEFINITIONS)
How do you think about an extension for this programming interface?
Would you like to support that target parameters like preprocessor
symbols are queried from the build environment even if
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/20/2011 12:10 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
Is the command variant string(REGEX REPLACE ...) completely documented?
Can multiple variables be specified that will
On 01/20/2011 02:01 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/20/2011 12:10 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
Is the command variant string(REGEX REPLACE ...) completely documented?
Can multiple
On 01/20/2011 02:14 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/20/2011 02:01 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/20/2011 12:10 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
Thanks for your
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/20/2011 02:01 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/20/2011 12:10 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
Is the
If you are creating a command line program then the included fixup_bundle will
not work since it looks for a .app folder structure to fix. Instead you
probably want to pass in the path to the executable located in
${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/bin/MyExecutable to BundleUtilities.
Any library
Probably that would be pretty difficult to achieve and definitely would
break backwards-compatibility beyond resurrection.
I have got a different opinion. I imagine that a property with a new name can
provide the desired service to retrieve target parameters in a portable way from
the build
On 01/19/2011 07:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 30 December 2010, Michael Wild wrote:
On 12/30/2010 11:33 AM, Ian Monroe wrote:
To create my QyotoConfig.cmake I need to know the full path of a
library so that I can set a variable like QYOTO_LIBRARY.
This is pretty standard
On 01/20/2011 04:30 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
Probably that would be pretty difficult to achieve and definitely would
break backwards-compatibility beyond resurrection.
I have got a different opinion. I imagine that a property with a new
name can provide the desired service to retrieve
2011/1/20 SF Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net:
Probably that would be pretty difficult to achieve and definitely would
break backwards-compatibility beyond resurrection.
I have got a different opinion. I imagine that a property with a new name
can provide the desired service to
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
On 01/19/2011 07:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 30 December 2010, Michael Wild wrote:
On 12/30/2010 11:33 AM, Ian Monroe wrote:
To create my QyotoConfig.cmake I need to know the full path of a
library so that I can set a
On Thursday 20 January 2011, James Bigler wrote:
I'm noticing that on some systems they package the NVIDIA driver into
different directories than the driver is typically installed. In order to
make stuff link properly at run time these non-standard locations are added
to /etc/ld.so.conf.d.
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
Greetings,
the Code Blocks generator is not adding to the project the sources,
specified in the command.
In order to add a group of header files to my project tree, I'm trying
to implement the solution posted here:
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
On 01/20/2011 02:14 PM, David Cole wrote:
...
Me too. I had to go searching for CMAKE_MATCH_ because I knew it was
stated somewhere. Much to my surprise, there was only a single
CMAKE_MATCH on our whole documentation page. It would make sense
On Thursday 20 January 2011, James Bigler wrote:
I'm noticing that on some systems they package the NVIDIA driver into
different directories than the driver is typically installed. In
order to make stuff link properly at run time these non-standard
locations are added to
On Sunday 09 January 2011, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 01/09/2011 09:47 PM, Nizar Khalifa Sallem wrote:
At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 21:42:49 +0100,
Michael Hertling wrote:
On 01/09/2011 09:09 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 09.01.11 21:05:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 09.01.11 14:24:16, Michael
On Monday 10 January 2011, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
Hi all,
I just found out that CHECK_INCLUDE_FILES ignores CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH. The
documentation for CHECK_INCLUDE_FILES says:
...
The following variables may be set before calling this macro to
modify the way the check is run:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
On 01/20/2011 02:14 PM, David Cole wrote:
...
Me too. I had to go searching for CMAKE_MATCH_ because I knew it was
stated somewhere. Much to my surprise,
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011, James Bigler wrote:
I'm noticing that on some systems they package the NVIDIA driver into
different directories than the driver is typically installed. In
order to make stuff link
On Monday 10 January 2011, Emmanuel Blot wrote:
INCLUDE (CMakeForceCompiler)
CMAKE_FORCE_C_COMPILER (arm-eabi-gcc-4.5.2 GNU 4)
I haven't used that one before.
FWIW: I found why I use CMAKE_FORCE_C_COMPILER rather than the simpler
CMAKE_C_COMPILER command:
I build projects for eCos from
Hi Justin,
On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Justin Holewinski wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Johan Björk p...@spotify.com wrote:
Hi Justin,
I'm very unsure if this is the correct solution, but it worked for me. I
haven't been able to find any good documentation stating how the
On 01/20/2011 12:22 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
On 01/19/2011 07:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Wow, good summary.
Can you please put that in a wiki page on http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake?
On Friday 03 December 2010, Andrea Galeazzi wrote:
Il 03/12/2010 13.15, Michael Wild ha scritto:
On 12/03/2010 01:06 PM, Andrea Galeazzi wrote:
How can I specify the as command like I do for gcc or g++ compiler in
a toolchain?
SET(CMAKE_C_COMPILER
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Brad King wrote:
On 01/20/2011 12:22 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
On 01/19/2011 07:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Wow, good summary.
Can you please put that in a wiki page on
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
Greetings,
the Code Blocks generator is not adding to the project the sources,
specified in the command.
In order to add a group of header files to my
Well I do have a folder structure, which looks like this:
$ ls -R madx_dev.app/
Contents
madx_dev.app//Contents:
Info.plist MacOS Resources
madx_dev.app//Contents/MacOS:
madx_dev
madx_dev.app//Contents/Resources:
MadX.icns
But it does not seem that the fixup-command does anything for me
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:06:33PM +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
Ah, yes. I keep forgetting. Might I propose that the documentation about
regular expressions be extracted into its own section and then be
referenced from all commands that have a REGEX mode? Because,
confusingly, the only
When you have such different levels of option you may do something like:
OPTION(DEVELOPER_OPT_ENABLE Enable developer options OFF)
OPTION(SYSTEM_INTEGRATOR_OPT_ENABLE Enable system integrator
specific options OFF)
OPTION(TOOL_USERS_OPT_ENABLE Enable tool users options ON)
- software
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
Greetings,
the Code Blocks generator is not adding to the project the sources,
specified in the
I kinda know the simple answer is 'no.' I hope there's a creative
*couch*sneaky*cough* way to do this.
I'm trying to build CableSwig as a external project as part of ITK. I
have this working for a single-process build. It works in that case
because the ExternalProject_add happens textually
On 1/20/2011 3:19 PM, kent williams wrote:
I kinda know the simple answer is 'no.' I hope there's a creative
*couch*sneaky*cough* way to do this.
I'm trying to build CableSwig as a external project as part of ITK. I
have this working for a single-process build. It works in that case
because
On 01/20/2011 01:36 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Brad King wrote:
This all has been documented on the Wiki for years:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_2.6_Notes
It is more of a tutorial/reference format than an example/template though.
Yes, it's just hard to
hello cmakers,
i've been parsing some of the documentation/posts etc on continuous
builds. it seems a pretty common pattern for people to settle on a while
loop such as the one described in the official wiki
(http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Scripting_Of_CTest):
while (${CTEST_ELAPSED_TIME} LESS
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 1/20/2011 3:19 PM, kent williams wrote:
I kinda know the simple answer is 'no.' I hope there's a creative
*couch*sneaky*cough* way to do this.
I'm trying to build CableSwig as a external project as part of ITK. I
have this working
On 20.01.2011, at 18:37, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
On 01/20/2011 02:14 PM, David Cole wrote:
...
Me too. I had to go searching for CMAKE_MATCH_ because I knew it was
stated somewhere. Much to my surprise, there was
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 08:38:41PM +, Marco Craveiro wrote:
the bit i fail to understand is why is 36000 deemed as a good value
rather than ~86400? or is this because a lot of people have copied and
pasted from the wiki page? :-)
Since the examples come from scripts Kitware uses in
2011/1/20 Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de:
When you have such different levels of option you may do something like:
OPTION(DEVELOPER_OPT_ENABLE Enable developer options OFF)
OPTION(SYSTEM_INTEGRATOR_OPT_ENABLE Enable system integrator
specific options OFF)
OPTION(TOOL_USERS_OPT_ENABLE
I know I've asked this before, but now I've narrowed it down a bit and I
have an example. This copies a *.res file to the binary directory where
presumably the executable can find it. The executable has that file as a
source file to hook up the dependency, and the copied file has the
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for your reply.
2011/1/20 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net:
On Monday 10 January 2011, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
Hi all,
I just found out that CHECK_INCLUDE_FILES ignores CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH. The
documentation for CHECK_INCLUDE_FILES says:
...
The following
On 01/20/2011 07:01 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Sunday 09 January 2011, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 01/09/2011 09:47 PM, Nizar Khalifa Sallem wrote:
At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 21:42:49 +0100,
Michael Hertling wrote:
On 01/09/2011 09:09 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 09.01.11 21:05:21, Andreas
Hi,
I had the same problem as OP. To fix, delete CMakeCache.txt in the build
dir, and run ccmake again. Phew!
BTW, is there a way to reply directly to an archived post? I just copied
the thread and subject into a new email msg, which is easy enough
actually.
Cheers,
Michael
Is tha with 2.8.3 or 2.8.4-rc1?
On Thursday, January 20, 2011, aaron_wri...@selinc.com wrote:
I know I've asked this before, but now I've narrowed it down a bit and I
have an example. This copies a *.res file to the binary directory where
presumably the executable can find it. The executable
Am Donnerstag, den 20.01.2011, 15:36 -0500 schrieb Brad King:
On 01/20/2011 01:36 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Brad King wrote:
This all has been documented on the Wiki for years:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_2.6_Notes
It is more of a
2011/1/20 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net:
check_include_files() is there to check whether header files in the
compilers
system include path exist, i.e. which are found without any -I switches.
So, from that POV, the behaviour is ok.
Aha, so software using check_include_files()
On 21.01.11 01:37:41, Michael Hertling wrote:
So, what's your conclusion in this matter? Should the behavior in
question be considered as a bug or is it alright? IMO, such a subtle
side effect of a read operation on a subsequent write operation is at
least highly surprising. Besides, does one
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11731
==
Reported By:Johannes Brunen
Assigned To:
On 20 January 2011 15:52, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Moving to the CMake developer's list, as requested by this bug comment:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11693#c24958
Comments or thoughts on the topic are welcome...
I'd agree, OSX applications almost never have the
2011/1/20 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
Moving to the CMake developer's list, as requested by this bug comment:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11693#c24958
Comments or thoughts on the topic are welcome...
Please reply here with any further discussion before adding more info
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11734
==
Reported By:David Cole
Assigned To:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com wrote:
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 09:36:13 am Eric Noulard wrote:
2011/1/20 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
Moving to the CMake developer's list, as requested by this bug comment:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11735
==
Reported By:Torsten Rohlfing
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11736
==
Reported By:Alex Neundorf
Assigned To:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 0aadafa069824f107fa68a875c97e778c3cf1c98 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 52a78520f853c6f2ffee2c41bc2d7bfb05fd54fe (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 2acfb25d43264514ae3712375b2543e57bf57414 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 7e05f2022b860b00c67d7e2fb930c52fe52a9f3a (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 9efb320e3bde9d080a8f4af33016a8354fba60df (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via ad4e4f64662f5387b539edde5fd09231cab1b5b4 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 48f7f1121be292e941ab1eb4f710e23ff9ac95a6 (commit)
via
65 matches
Mail list logo
