Hello,
Does the macro CMAKE_DEPENDENT_OPTION contain any open issues in its
implementation that should be changed?
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=blob;f=Modules/CMakeDependentOption.cmake;hb=2cde67a78123a4e59390f7aa2030ea8ff9e206d2
Regards,
Markus
On 04/24/2011 04:56 PM, Campbell Barton wrote:
2011/4/23 YangXi jianding...@msn.com:
In my program, I have several pictures and plain-text data files. Usually in
a unix system, they should be placed on /usr/share/my_program/some_place.
How could I define those files in CMakeLists, and make
On 04/25/2011 12:48 PM, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 04/24/2011 04:56 PM, Campbell Barton wrote:
2011/4/23 YangXi jianding...@msn.com:
In my program, I have several pictures and plain-text data files. Usually in
a unix system, they should be placed on /usr/share/my_program/some_place.
How could
Have you tried it? What were the results?
This is more of a question for the NSIS community, I think.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:06 PM, NoRulez noru...@me.com wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to use *.PNG images instead of the BMP images for
header/sidebar?
Thanks in advance
Best
2011/4/25 AJ ONeal coola...@gmail.com:
What's the preferred solution to the OS X getline problem (meaning that it
doesn't exist in OS X's libc) when using CMake?
(Don't use getline isn't an option)
I don't think this is a CMake question.
If you need getline on OS X then may be you'll have to
For the CMake side of things you can actually check for the function during the
initial cmake checks:
INCLUDE (${CMAKE_ROOT}/Modules/CheckFunctionExists.cmake)
CHECK_FUNCTION_EXISTS(getline HAS_GETLINE)
This will perform the check and put the result into the variable HAS_GETLINE.
The easiest
Hello,
I did a quick search for a bsd equivalent and found this:
http://doubletalkin.blogspot.com/2008/08/fgetln-replacement-for-getline-in-bsd.html
To use this you would probably have to use the appropriate include
guards or use a macro to redefine the name of the function.
Regards,
Juan
On
On 04/21/2011 03:44 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 04/21/2011 02:45 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com
mailto:them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/21/2011 06:48 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to set up a SuperBuild
On 04/25/2011 01:53 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 04/25/2011 12:48 PM, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 04/24/2011 04:56 PM, Campbell Barton wrote:
2011/4/23 YangXi jianding...@msn.com:
In my program, I have several pictures and plain-text data files. Usually
in
a unix system, they should be placed
On 04/25/2011 04:51 PM, Michael Hertling wrote:
[...]
I also solved my installation problem. By having all sub-projects
install into a common prefix, and thanks to the wonders of RPATH and
install_name which can handle relative paths and thanks to the fact that
install(EXPORT) generated files
If I have a custom command:
add_custom_command(OUTPUT myfile.out)
Then I add that file to the target:
add_executable(mytarget main.cpp myfile.out)
If I do a 'make help' I get rules for main.o, but none for myfile.out. Is
there something I can add to create a helper makefile target?
Thanks,
2011/4/25 James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com:
If I have a custom command:
add_custom_command(OUTPUT myfile.out)
Then I add that file to the target:
add_executable(mytarget main.cpp myfile.out)
If I do a 'make help' I get rules for main.o, but none for myfile.out. Is
there something I
Thank you Mike and Eric,
Mike,
This is the level of detail that I was hoping for in regards to CMake.
In order to get it to compile I had copy/pasted a getline substitute.
Now I'll go back and try to configure CMake correctly so that it works on
both OS X and Linux.
Eric,
The second link you
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/4/25 James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com:
If I have a custom command:
add_custom_command(OUTPUT myfile.out)
Then I add that file to the target:
add_executable(mytarget main.cpp myfile.out)
If I do a
I'm trying to generate both source tarballs and binary packages using
CPack, and I'm at something of a loss as to how to achieve the
following:
I want the binaries (RPM, DEB, etc.) to respect the
CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX. I want the source tarballs to expand into their
directory like a standard
2011/4/25 Clifford Yapp cliffy...@gmail.com:
I'm trying to generate both source tarballs and binary packages using
CPack, and I'm at something of a loss as to how to achieve the
following:
I want the binaries (RPM, DEB, etc.) to respect the
CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX. I want the source tarballs
Eric,
Thanks - that looks like it will do the trick, testing now. Is there
a bug report somewhere proposing using CMake-level per-generator
variables to control these things?
Cheers,
CY
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source
2011/4/25 Clifford Yapp cliffy...@gmail.com:
Eric,
Thanks - that looks like it will do the trick, testing now. Is there
a bug report somewhere proposing using CMake-level per-generator
variables to control these things?
AFAIK there aren't any.
Now adding this for ALL CPack generators would
On 04/25/2011 05:03 PM, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 04/25/2011 01:53 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 04/25/2011 12:48 PM, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 04/24/2011 04:56 PM, Campbell Barton wrote:
2011/4/23 YangXi jianding...@msn.com:
In my program, I have several pictures and plain-text data
files.
On 04/23/2011 12:46 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to use BundleUtilities with MSVC 9 to install the required
Qt4 DLL's of the GUI sub-project into a common prefix in the super-build
binary directory. The process fails with the (abbreviated) output at the
end of this message.
On 04/05/2011 12:13 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 08:33 AM, Brad King wrote:
On 04/04/2011 12:01 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Done.
Thanks!
While running the test on more platforms I ran into a problem. On
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 12:13 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 08:33 AM, Brad King wrote:
On 04/04/2011 12:01 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Done.
Thanks!
On 04/25/2011 11:54 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Is just putting IF(UNIX) ... around all the stuff enough for that?
It's not just the test. The C++ implementation cannot handle all
generators. It should be taught to run only for generators where it
is known to work. Perhaps it can check a value
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/25/2011 11:54 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Is just putting IF(UNIX) ... around all the stuff enough for that?
It's not just the test. The C++ implementation cannot handle all
generators. It should be taught to run
On 04/25/2011 12:06 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/25/2011 11:54 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Is just putting IF(UNIX) ... around all the stuff enough for that?
It's not just the test. The C++ implementation cannot handle
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 2b62ff896c16484ef207b71ddfd9e0ffad6ad8a6 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via 667ff4023fd2be9dd12f75b6c4c47fd3249abe23 (commit)
from
27 matches
Mail list logo
