Hi,
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:39:44 -0400, Brad King wrote:
On 09/04/2012 04:18 PM, Patrick Gansterer wrote:
I rebased the code and pushed it as ce to
https://gitorious.org/~paroga/cmake/parogas-cmake
(git://gitorious.org/~paroga/cmake/parogas-cmake.git)
Thanks! I'm looking at the first commit
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13515
==
Reported By:Joke de Buhr
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13516
==
Reported By:Frank Bergmann
Assigned To:
On 09/04/2012 07:46 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Any optimization that skips dependency checks should
be done only for the first form, and never for the
second form. This distinction should cover the
BuildDepends test case too.
On 05.09.2012 13:31, Brad King wrote:
On 09/04/2012 07:46 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Any optimization that skips dependency checks should
be done only for the first form, and never for the
second form. This distinction should cover the
BuildDepends test case too.
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13517
==
Reported By:Steven Oliver
Assigned To:
Dear CMake developers,
I wanted to know if it is possible to let CMake generate a project that uses
the internal build system of the Code::Blocks IDE.
My motivation for this was that a friend of mine, who works together with me
on different projects that use CMake, uses Code::Blocks for years.
On Wednesday 05 September 2012, Benjamin Eikel wrote:
Dear CMake developers,
I wanted to know if it is possible to let CMake generate a project that
uses the internal build system of the Code::Blocks IDE.
My motivation for this was that a friend of mine, who works together with
me on
Hello Alex,
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2012 um 19:34:56 schrieb Alexander Neundorf:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012, Benjamin Eikel wrote:
Dear CMake developers,
I wanted to know if it is possible to let CMake generate a project that
uses the internal build system of the Code::Blocks IDE.
On 9/5/2012 2:48 PM, Benjamin Eikel wrote:
So, go ahead:-)
Is it possible to build a CodeBlocks project from the command line ?
I think this is necessary so all the tests can be executed.
if the new CMake generator builds an XML project file like it is done at the
moment, sure. Why shouldn't
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2012 um 20:54:57 schrieb Alexander Neundorf:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012, Benjamin Eikel wrote:
Hello Alex,
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2012 um 19:34:56 schrieb Alexander Neundorf:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012, Benjamin Eikel wrote:
Dear CMake
On 09/05/2012 04:26 AM, Patrick Gansterer wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. I've updated my changes and pushed it to the
same branch.
Great, thanks. I've pushed the platform file commits with minor tweaks:
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=e7cb8055
The following issue is now in status NEW (again)
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13306
==
Reported By:Jona
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13519
==
Reported By:Jtappin
Assigned To:
I have tried VS 2012 and I'm not getting exceptions when cmake regenerates
projects. They get reloaded by the IDE and so it looks like things are good.
Only one day of trying, so I may still be disappointed, but so far I'm happy.
Hopefully I won't need those add-ins, but since I use intel
Hi David, Hi Bill
The GUID ist part of the vcproj by design. Of course we can use 2.8.7 to
fix that problem. But in my eyes it would make sense to fix that problem
in future releases of cmake.
It's just changing
if(this-Version = VS8)
into
if(this-Version = VS7)
Thus: it's not a show
Hi,
I have a need to build different parts of a project using different
version of g++
If I set the top level CMakeLists.txt compiler
via -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/usr/local/bin/g++
and subsequently use another compiler
SET ( CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER /usr/bin/g++ )
I get this error in a cmake list ...
--
View this message in context:
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/unknown-cmake-command-configure-boost-tp7581513.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
^^ error is unknown cmake command configure_boost
--
View this message in context:
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/unknown-cmake-command-configure-boost-tp7581513p7581514.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
On 9/5/2012 1:59 AM, Biddiscombe, John A. wrote:
I have tried VS 2012 and I'm not getting exceptions when cmake
regenerates projects. They get reloaded by the IDE and so it looks
like things are good. Only one day of trying, so I may still be
disappointed, but so far I'm happy. Hopefully I won't
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2012 um 12:55:50 schrieb geek121:
^^ error is unknown cmake command configure_boost
Why do you think configure_boost is a valid CMake command? I was not able to
find it in the documentation.
--
View this message in context:
It's better to use ExternalProject.cmake to configure part of your solution
with different compiler.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Nicholas Yue yue.nicho...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I have a need to build different parts of a project using different
version of g++
If I set the top
Hi,
I'm new to CMake, but quite familiar with Autotools. I am trying to do
something that is probably quite simple, but I cannot find any
documentation for. The distribution creation mechanism is difficult to
learn because of the lack of documentation. For instance, it seems (though
I'm not sure
For static libraries the macro GENERATE_EXPORT_HEADER produce an output
like this one:
...
#else
# ifndef CTEST_EXPORT
#ifdef cTest_EXPORTS
/* We are building this library */
# define CTEST_EXPORT
#else
/* We are using this library */
# define CTEST_EXPORT
#
On 9/5/2012 3:52 PM, Micha Renner wrote:
For static libraries the macro GENERATE_EXPORT_HEADER produce an output
like this one:
...
#else
# ifndef CTEST_EXPORT
#ifdef cTest_EXPORTS
/* We are building this library */
# define CTEST_EXPORT
#else
/* We are
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Daniel Dekkers d.dekk...@cthrough.nl wrote:
Hi, does anyone know what this “Boost_DIR” variable is from the
findBoost.cmake module? And why it is never found?
Everything works well, I use BOOST_ROOT to set the path to the Boost
distribution, just curious.
Sorry for delay... I checked that setting CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS without
CACHE attribute doesnt make a change. But if I switched to NMake then all
things
started to work. Incremental linking is turned off, traceback works.
Exactly the same CMakeLists.txt produces wrong project for VS.
What do you
I might be wrong but my understanding is that it's the other way arround:
you provide Boost_DIR (root of your boost installation) and it finds the
rest itself.
I've been using it like that. I have a custom build of boost in a specific
directory and an environnement variable Boost_DIR set to it. I
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Klaim - Joël Lamotte mjkl...@gmail.com wrote:
I might be wrong but my understanding is that it's the other way arround:
you provide Boost_DIR (root of your boost installation) and it finds the
rest itself.
I've been using it like that. I have a custom build of
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:24 PM, David Doria daviddo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Klaim - Joël Lamotte mjkl...@gmail.com
wrote:
I might be wrong but my understanding is that it's the other way arround:
you provide Boost_DIR (root of your boost installation) and it finds
This might have already been answered on the list but it didn't come
up in a search.
Someone that I work with was trying to run a ctest
dashboard-generation script on OS X, and ctest was reporting There
was an error: No such file or directory. Running ctest -VV gave
more info about the error:
Hi, I look this ML:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-January/034437.html
Does CMake still can't support how to add sources to a target library after
add_library()?
I wan't support Precompiled Header for both MSVC / GCC(MinGW).
In MSVC case, it need a source, e.g. StdAfx.cpp to support
On 06/09/2012 00:30, Loaden wrote:
Hi, I look this ML:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-January/034437.html
Does CMake still can't support how to add sources to a target library
after add_library()?
I wan't support Precompiled Header for both MSVC / GCC(MinGW).
In MSVC case, it need a
Yes, it simply for GCC. But it is diffrent for MSVC compiler.
for MSVC, we have to use a .cpp file, e.g. stdafx.cpp to support
precompiled. (/Yc flags)
For now, I have to implement it like this to support both MSVC and GCC's
PCH support.
set(target Core)
if (QTCREATOR_PRECOMPILED AND MSVC)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 6b1ccc4ad2de5548db2d607a41f944b7acdf7102 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via adcef9697b33c0e574b32e7a1a4f7579c7ec9524 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via dc4345a1a236ecd4ad95980507ca825c9abc9327 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 2dd3b783fdc8d0c918d8134f9623439940715073 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via fc28530d55f0955423620941521e8dc52418f08b (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 1577079663bb2f720157ca614b6bae9600161a08 (commit)
via
Stamp
diff --git a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
index 264dcc9..86f8282 100644
--- a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
+++ b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
set(CMake_VERSION_MAJOR 2)
set(CMake_VERSION_MINOR 8)
set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 9)
-set(CMake_VERSION_TWEAK 20120905
41 matches
Mail list logo
