://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
default behavior on Unix platforms.
If you want FindBoost to search for static libraries instead, simply set:
set(Boost_USE_STATIC_LIBS ON)
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http
/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered
people from breaking things).
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
in order for CMake to cause them to be generated.
E.g.
add_executable(foo foo.cc ${PROTO_SRCS} ${PROTO_HDRS})
target_link_libraries(foo ${PROTOBUF_LIBRARIES})
Hope that solves your problem.
--
Philip Lowman
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http
://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
. Sounds like that's what would have
to be written.
cmCTestTestHandler::GenerateDartOutput
Looks like it may be a place to start?
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic
/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
/precomp.html#sec15
HTH
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki
a roadmap be posted for CMake? Such as is for other projects at:
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/roadmap_page.php
___
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-develop...@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
--
Philip
and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http
${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/libnspr4a.so
/usr/lib/libnspr4a.so
This is with CMake 2.8.2
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check
, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8. Sep, 2010, at 8:25 , Philip Lowman wrote:
Let's say I have many different potential names for a library and the
following filesystem
/usr/lib/libnspr4.so
${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/libnspr4a.so
find_library(TEST_LIBRARY
NAMES nspr4
this over... It
was one approach for how to solve the version number problem...
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8396
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
Hi everyone,
I'm volunteering to become the primary maintainer of FindBoost.cmake.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages
.
For now I would just recommend adding the target_link_library manually
against pthreads when you're using it and ensure we have a bug filed for
this issue in the tracker.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Matthew Woehlke
matthew.woeh...@kitware.com wrote:
On 09/10/2010 09:02 AM, Philip Lowman wrote
messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open
a new ticket
and submit a patch. It would save probably at least a second off of an
initial configure.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please
for CMake 2.8.3, I plan on removing it
and just counting on if the user has defined Boost_USE_STATIC_RUNTIME or not
(regardless if they set it ON or OFF) to disable the double search on
WIN32.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other
specify). This is
kind of related to my ticket asking for a distclean target, so I'll just
throw it out there in case anyone has some free time on their hands.
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6647
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
isn't
aware of (that aren't generated), these could be added to
ADDITIONAL_MAKE_CLEAN_FILES, or a new property could be added for custom
files that are to be deleted on a distclean.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open
this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow
FindBoost.cmake and the branch of Boost that you're referring to and I would
be more than happy to look into the issue. I've heard reports of people
getting FindBoost and CMakeified boost to play nice together but it involved
changing build settings in CMakeified Boost (not quite ideal).
--
Philip
have to be an extended form of the find_library(),
find_path(), etc. commands.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Luigi Calori l.cal...@cineca.it wrote:
On 07/11/2010 21.01, Philip Lowman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Luigi Calori l.cal...@cineca.it wrote:
+1 for FindBoost support to CMakeified version of Boost at
http://gitorious.org/~denisarnaud/boost
/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open
add_custom_target() when you could just use
add_executable() and target_link_libraries(), but I doubt this has anything
to do with your undefined symbol reference.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http
this:
include(CheckTypeSize)
CHECK_TYPE_SIZE(void* SIZEOF_PTR)
message(size of pointer = ${SIZEOF_PTR})
Then if SIZEOF_PTR is 4, you would set BOOST_LIBRARYDIR to be
${BOOST_ROOT}/lib32 and if it is 8, you set it to ${BOOST_ROOT}/lib64.
--
Philip Lowman
when generated by
visual studio?
If you want to try to patch FindBoost yourself, please make sure
you're playing with the version from 2.8.3.
http://www.cmake.org/Bug
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source
/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
On Sunday, December 5, 2010, Hicham Mouline hic...@mouline.org wrote:
I've built both win32 and x64 versions of boost thread library with the
following 2 lines:
1. 32bit cl.exe from msvc9 directory in the %PATH%
bjam --with-thread --layout=versioned toolset=msvc address-model=64
and force it into the bug tracker. It seems a little rude to the person
that emailed about the issue because you might be asking them to deal with
the rigmarole of creating a mantis account when they already went through
the hassle of joining the mailing list and making the post.
--
Philip Lowman
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Philip Lowman wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Philip Lowman wrote
in the
Eclipse generator that examine EXECUTABLE_OUTPUT_PATH and
LIBRARY_OUTPUT_PATH but shouldn't it also check
CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY and CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY?
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org
}_LIBRARY})
endif(MSVC OR OSG_FIND_LIBRARY_SEARCH_DEBUG)
endfunction(_OSG_FIND_LIBRARY module library)
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
variable that determines whether or not these DEBUG
variables are created in the cache, I just can't find an easy way to delete
them if the user changes their mind after initial configure.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http
this was this:
find_library(FOO_LIBRARY foo)
if(MSVC OR SEARCH_FOO_DEBUG)
find_library(FOO_LIBRARY_DEBUG food)
else()
unset(FOO_LIBRARY_DEBUG)
set(FOO_LIBRARY_DEBUG ${FOO_LIBRARY})
endif()
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=7507
Comments?
--
Philip Lowman
)
as someone else pointed out, is somewhat confusing. Without referencing the
documentation many programmers might think this defines a variable called
FOO and sets it to empty but what it really is doing is *undefining* the
variable FOO entirely if it exists.
--
Philip Lowman
stuck. I can hide them,
force them to something else, override them locally after I force them or
not, pretty much anything I could think of except simply deleting them.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Brad King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Lowman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Brad King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The set command already supports unsetting:
set(FOO xyz)
set(FOO) # unsets
formally suggest that via a bug report?
Would $CACHE{var} be a better idea?
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:27 AM, cyril_wobow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Lowman a écrit :
Does LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES_CONFIG do what you want to do?
See
http://www.cmake.org/HTML/cmake-2.6.html#prop_tgt:LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIESin
conjunction with SET_PROPERTY command
and they aren't going anywhere. What is the
harm in accepting a patch (if a user submitted one) that facilitated global
association of custom build configurations with the debug/optimized
keywords? I'm honestly surprised that this has been hardcoded for as long
as it has been.
--
Philip Lowman
MinSizeRel.)
ENDIF()
PROJECT(foo)
ADD_EXECUTABLE(foo foo.cc)
#
Hope this helps. Also, be aware it will not work on multiple solution
generators like for Visual Studio.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Brad King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Lowman wrote:
Ultimately, TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES() works just fine the way it is with
the debug/optimized keywords satisfying normal use cases. The
debug/optimized keywords are in the lexicon and they aren't going
to define this.
http://predef.sourceforge.net/precomp.html#sec13
HTH
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
PROPERTIES LINK_FLAGS /MAP)
ENDIF()
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Philip Lowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incidentally, CMake doesn't have /MAP in it's list of understood VS flags
so it will show up under the Additional Linking Flags section of the Linker
properties and not where you're probably used to seeing it.
And here's
be unable to clean. One example would be a user running
a custom script that generates files that CMake doesn't know about. These
are likely to be few and far between, but when they do arise can easily be
handled by the user with ADDITIONAL_MAKE_CLEAN_FILES.
--
Philip Lowman
of the FindRTI.cmake module is ready and I volunteer to be
its maintainer.
I would also like to see a FindRTI module added to CMake.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Alexander Neundorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2008, Philip Lowman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Fernando Cacciola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And while you are it.. I currently use: set(var) to read the value
back from
Bill,
Is a switch to Subversion still planned at some point in the near future for
CMake?
On occasion I have wanted to checkout the latest CVS from work and am
reminded of the corporate firewall. =)
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake
of an svn:externals repository, but other than
that it's not that bad. :)
I haven't used git but have heard good things about it. It sounds like a bad
choice for CMake if there aren't any good Windows clients, though.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake
actually have the authority to commit your module, but hopefully the
fact that it's been peer reviewed by at least someone will help you through
getting it conforming to CMake expectations and checked in. =)
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake
).
As for how to do the copying easily, you might find this macro helpful:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMakeCopyIfDifferent
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
prior to redefining it and then
restore it when finished. You don't want your module to change the default
behavior of CMake for other find modules which get called afterwards.
Alternatively you can always add libRTI to the list of allowable library
names and include an explanation.
--
Philip
referring to it with GetDefinition() would
crash.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
to suggest a location to find the SDL.
set(SDL_ROOT CACHE PATH The location of the SDL install prefix (only
used if the SDL is not yet found))
if(SDL_ROOT)
set(CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH ${SDL_ROOT})
endif()
FIND_PACKAGE(SDL)
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing
)
How can I do that?
I'm not completely sure what you're asking for, but the IF() command does
support checking for targets if that's what you're looking for:
if(TARGET target-name)
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake2.6docs.html
--
Philip Lowman
to
manipulate CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH (or CMAKE_INCLUDE_PATH / CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH) to
effect the detection of the libraries.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Philip Lowman wrote:
I noticed local CMake variables for CMAKE_INCLUDE_PATH and
Hmm, I can't reproduce the problem:
Sorry for any wasted time. I did some work tonight first trying
? Are there any plans to simplify this? The way it is now is redundant
and boilerplate.
On CMake 2.6.x you no longer have to match the endif(). If you're still
using CMake 2.4.x you can set CMAKE_ALLOW_LOOSE_LOOP_CONSTRUCTS.
http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/CMake_Useful_Variables
--
Philip Lowman
root.
For this, simply set the folder name to
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
developers for what seems
like forever.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
but this is a big blocker for me. Any solutions to this?
Thanks.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http
possible
future version number of Boost into FindBoost.cmake).
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
a lot of includes.
http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/CMake_Useful_Variables
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
ever been considered? The idea would be to allow
the user to (as a one time operation) to force a cache value on top of an
already existing cache entry. It would be useful for appending options, for
example.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Robert Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Philip Lowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
include( ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/includes.cmake)
should also work.
CMAKE_MODULE_PATH may also help you if you have a lot of includes.
http
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Matthew Woehlke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need a bug opened for this or is it trivial enough to fix on the spot?
unset appears to be in --help-commands and --help-command-list. Was this a
bug? If so, how was it fixed?
--
Philip Lowman
. Obviously there
is the apriori option here though (distribute configuration help ahead of
time or require the user to configure manually first).
2. The generated documentation (as Bill alluded to) would be dependent on
which branches were taken during the configure
--
Philip Lowman
and is subject to change.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
or is it obsolete?
Also, CMAKE_COMPILER_2005 seems to be true on VS9/2008 at least with the
NMake generator. Not sure if this is a documentation bug or a real bug.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Matthew Woehlke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Lowman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Matthew Woehlke snipped wrote:
Need a bug opened for this or is it trivial enough to fix on the spot?
unset appears to be in --help-commands and --help-command
this in conjunction with the other flags to limit the tests
preformed (see -E for example).
Also, if you haven't found it already, this may be of interest:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=6401
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http
.. Original Message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:50:28 -0500 Bill Hoffman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Lowman wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Tron Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if the original test and RUN_TESTS targets could
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Philip Lowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Bill Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
However, all that said, I suppose an option to output on failure would not
be so bad as long as it is not the default.
All things being equal, I
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Philip Lowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a known problem. Visual Studio has no way of knowing that the
compiler flags changed in a project file CMake is writing to.
I would love to see a patch for this for CMake 2.8.
One thought I had here was to have
Sent this in a few days ago for any who are interested.
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8222
It's not bloat, it's convenience! =)
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
the BoostPro installer (even
with CMake 2.6.3 RC5) the FindBoost.cmake file will discover
BOOST_INCLUDEDIR but will not find any libraries.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
a config.h include file in your software project, it's
going to be a lot of work to switch.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
reproduces the
problem you're having?
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
are:
Boost_FILESYSTEM_LIBRARY_DEBUG = ...NOTFOUND
Boost_FILESYSTEM_LIBRARY_RELEASE = ...NOTFOUND
Boost_INCLUDE_DIR = C:/Program Files/boost/boost_1_36_0
Boost_LIB_DIAGNOSTIC_DEFINITIONS = -DBOOST_LIB_DIAGNOSTIC
Boost_USE_MULTITHREADED =On
--
Philip Lowman
.)
endif()
Would the CMake Devs Consider a Patch for inclusion into the next CMake
Release?
Second!
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
bugs in the tracker aren't getting dealt with (don't know
why). Perhaps Kitware should recruit some more people to help with triage?
There are 83 in the new state at the current time. Obviously Boost issues
are falling through the cracks along with many other bugs. :(
--
Philip Lowman
Is anyone else having problems with accessing the CMake website?
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
. Original Message ...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:03:48 +0100 Eric NOULARD eric.noul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:50:29 -0500,
Philip Lowman phi...@yhbt.com a écrit :
There's an open bug to fix this here:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8173
be to run your test
binaries within CTest and use the latest support in CMake CVS for setting
environment variables for tests (i.e. set PATH to be
$ENV{PATH};${CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY} ).
http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7885
--
Philip Lowman
to patch CVS CMake with the patch attached here.
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8255
Philip Lowman wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Tron Thomas tron.tho...@verizon.netwrote:
It would be nice if the original test and RUN_TESTS targets could be
configured this way without
for
some help here.
Regards,
--
Pierrick Grasland
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Philip Lowman
FindGTK2.cmake
Description: Binary data
___
CMake mailing
be handled within a properly written and tested
FindGTK2.cmake
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
all the stuff in two large lists exposed as
GTK2_INCLUDE_DIRS and GTK2_LIBRARIES.
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
target to be the default
project? Thanks!
There was a thread about this topic called:
Making ALL_BUILD be Visual Studio's startup project
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8172
I'm guessing the fix for this is still outstanding since the bug report is
still open.
--
Philip Lowman
already there otherwise you would have had
the same compilation issues you have now with your widgets).
If you have a lot of source files you could use the sed tool along with a
regular expression to accomplish your fix (make backups first obviously).
--
Philip Lowman
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Hendrik Sattler p...@hendrik-sattler.dewrote:
Am Thursday 18 December 2008 20:03:25 schrieb Philip Lowman:
Could you try the following beta FindGTK2 module?
Set CMAKE_MODULE_PATH prior to calling FIND_PACKAGE(GTK2 COMPONENTS gtk)
See the module
using the NDEBUG definition for your problem (via a 3rd wrapper
file for every affected header file)
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
is a concern you can remove the cmake-gui,
documentation, man pages, ctest, cpack and end up with a pretty small
package approximately 11MB in size uncompressed.
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/resources/software.html
--
Philip Lowman
___
CMake mailing list
1 - 100 of 573 matches
Mail list logo
