On 05/11/14 17:39, Brad King wrote:
> Would the name "UPDATE_INDEPENDENT" or "UPDATE_DISCONNECTED"
> make more sense? Otherwise, the topic looks ready for testing
> to me.
"UPDATE_INDEPENDENT" might be confused with something related to
"INDEPENDENT_STEP_TARGETS", so I'd rather choose between
SCM
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 15:03:02 -0800, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:49:52PM -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > For the testing of it, since only Ninja supports it, maybe it would be
> > possible to run a program which exits testing for isatty(STDIN_FILENO)
> > or isatty(STDOU
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:49:52PM -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 13:12:13 -0800, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > I've added documentation and tests and addressed Ben's comments, and
> > published
> > the staging branch 'console-pool'. PTAL.
>
> Thanks for splitting the commit
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 13:12:13 -0800, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> I've added documentation and tests and addressed Ben's comments, and published
> the staging branch 'console-pool'. PTAL.
Thanks for splitting the commits.
For the testing of it, since only Ninja supports it, maybe it would be
p
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:22:56PM -0800, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch exposes the Ninja console pool feature via the add_custom_command
> and add_custom_target commands. Specifically, it introduces a USE_CONSOLE
> flag which can be used to communicate to the generator that
On 11/05/2014 01:11 PM, Geoffrey Viola wrote:
> I rebased and squashed the previous commits and made some new changes.
Thanks. Here are more comments.
The hunk in Modules/CMakeSystemSpecificInformation.cmake is now
just removing a blank line so it should not be needed.
> +message("GHS-Determine
On 11/05/2014 02:32 PM, Tim Gallagher wrote:
> Next time I won't have to go back and forth several times
It's no problem. That's part of the code review process
and is to be expected. Thanks for your patience with it.
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and che
Great, thank you. Next time I won't have to go back and forth several times (I
hope)!
Tim
- Original Message -
From: "Brad King"
To: "Tim Gallagher"
Cc: cmake-developers@cmake.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 2:19:06 PM
Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] Assembly/preprocessed targets
On 11/05/2014 01:53 PM, Tim Gallagher wrote:
> Here's to hoping 3rd time's the charm...
Thanks. Applied with minor tweaks:
Makefile: Refactor checks for lang-specific targets and export compile cmds
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=06f8b429
Makefile: Add assembly and prepro
Here's to hoping 3rd time's the charm...
Also, what version of gfortran do you have that requires both -E and -cpp to do
the preprocessing? I don't need that on my version, I'm using 4.7.1. There may
need to be more sophisticated logic in the Compiler module to add -cpp to the
command line for
I rebased and squashed the previous commits and made some new changes. The GHS
generator should now build a kernel and a monolith, which is necessary to
autogenerate all the files necessary to compile. The generator determines that
the executable target is a kernel based on a compiler flag and d
On 11/05/2014 12:14 PM, Tim Gallagher wrote:
> I have attached an updated patch
Thanks! Please split this into two patches. The first one should
do the refactoring of the variable name and corresponding logic
with no functionality changes. The second one can add the Fortran
feature.
Also pleas
Sorry about the TABs, I guess emacs defaults to it and I never noticed.
I have attached an updated patch where the tabs are removed and the test for
CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS is also removed.
Tim
- Original Message -
From: "Brad King"
To: "tim gallagher" , cmake-developers@cmake.o
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2014, 10:38:14 schrieben Sie:
> So, it seems nothing changed. Looking at the log though, it looks like the
> flags aren't even getting used. Can you check the output of uname with
> it's various options? I suspect the result might not be exactly "parisc".
voyager ~ # un
hi brad,
>> [1] https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/pull/124
>
> Good start. Please extend documentation and tests for this feature
> similar to how it was done for install(FILES) in the above-linked
> commit.
>
> Then please read CONTRIBUTING.rst and send the patch to this list
> for further revi
On 11/05/2014 03:58 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
> If SCM_DISCONNECTED is set, the update step is not executed
> automatically when building the main target. The update step can still
> be added as a step target and called manually.
Good feature.
Would the name "UPDATE_INDEPENDENT" or "UPDA
On 11/05/2014 07:01 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
> i wonder, is there any reason for not supporting generator expressions
> for install(DIRECTORY)?
It just hasn't been implemented. Support for generator expressions
was added to install(FILES) here:
install: Support generator expressions in FILES an
On 11/04/2014 06:37 PM, Tim Gallagher wrote:
> I have attached the patch to enable the targets for Fortran.
Thanks. Please update it to avoid using hard TABs for indentation.
Also in the CompileCommandOutput test hunk:
> -project (CompileCommandOutput CXX)
> +project (CompileCommandOutput)
> +en
On 11/05/2014 10:38 AM, Chuck Atkins wrote:
> So, it seems nothing changed. Looking at the log though, it
> looks like the flags aren't even getting used.
The value of cmake_machine_parisc is not set on HP-UX by the
bootstrap script so it can only ever work on Linux right now.
These changes brok
So, it seems nothing changed. Looking at the log though, it looks like the
flags aren't even getting used. Can you check the output of uname with
it's various options? I suspect the result might not be exactly "parisc".
- Chuck
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Chuck Atkins
wrote:
> just a mat
On 11/04/2014 06:38 PM, Eric Wing wrote:
> This would be really useful to me.
No one plans to work on it AFAIK. You'd have to dig in yourself.
Sorry,
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware of
hi all,
i wonder, is there any reason for not supporting generator expressions
for install(DIRECTORY)? i need this functionality to be able to install
dSYM folders which are generated by xcode.
if not, could someone review/merge this patch [1]? it is probably too
late for 3.1, right?
thanks a lo
Hello all,
Please review the topic ExternalProject_SCM_DISCONNECTED.
This patch adds a SCM_DISCONNECTED option to ExternalProject_Add.
If SCM_DISCONNECTED is set, the update step is not executed
automatically when building the main target. The update step can still
be added as a step target and
23 matches
Mail list logo
